PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using administrative and claims data from 11 U.S. health plans and corresponding birth certificate data from state health departments. Diagnoses, drug dispensings, and procedure codes were used to identify infant outcomes (cardiac defects, anencephaly, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission) and maternal diagnoses (asthma and systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) recorded in the health plan data for live born deliveries between January 2001 and December 2007. A random sample of medical charts (n = 802) was abstracted for infants and mothers identified with the specified outcomes. Information on newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics (gestational age at birth, birth weight, previous pregnancies and live births, race/ethnicity) was also abstracted and compared to birth certificate data. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated with documentation in the medical chart serving as the gold standard. RESULTS: PPVs were 71% for cardiac defects, 37% for anencephaly, 87% for preterm birth, and 92% for NICU admission. PPVs for algorithms to identify maternal diagnoses of asthma and SLE were ≥ 93%. Our findings indicated considerable agreement (PPVs > 90%) between birth certificate and medical record data for measures related to birth weight, gestational age, prior obstetrical history, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Health plan and birth certificate data can be useful to accurately identify some infant outcomes, maternal diagnoses, and newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics. Other outcomes and variables may require medical record review for validation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using administrative and claims data from 11 U.S. health plans and corresponding birth certificate data from state health departments. Diagnoses, drug dispensings, and procedure codes were used to identify infant outcomes (cardiac defects, anencephaly, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission) and maternal diagnoses (asthma and systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) recorded in the health plan data for live born deliveries between January 2001 and December 2007. A random sample of medical charts (n = 802) was abstracted for infants and mothers identified with the specified outcomes. Information on newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics (gestational age at birth, birth weight, previous pregnancies and live births, race/ethnicity) was also abstracted and compared to birth certificate data. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated with documentation in the medical chart serving as the gold standard. RESULTS: PPVs were 71% for cardiac defects, 37% for anencephaly, 87% for preterm birth, and 92% for NICU admission. PPVs for algorithms to identify maternal diagnoses of asthma and SLE were ≥ 93%. Our findings indicated considerable agreement (PPVs > 90%) between birth certificate and medical record data for measures related to birth weight, gestational age, prior obstetrical history, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Health plan and birth certificate data can be useful to accurately identify some infant outcomes, maternal diagnoses, and newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics. Other outcomes and variables may require medical record review for validation.
Authors: William O Cooper; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Patricia Gideon; Shannon M Dyer; Kathleen Hall; Judith Dudley; Marisa Cevasco; Amanda B Thompson; Wayne A Ray Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Faouzi I Maalouf; William O Cooper; Shannon M Stratton; Judith A Dudley; Jean Ko; Anamika Banerji; Stephen W Patrick Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sascha Dublin; Karin E Johnson; Rod L Walker; Lyndsay A Avalos; Susan E Andrade; Sarah J Beaton; Robert L Davis; Lisa J Herrinton; Pamala A Pawloski; Marsha A Raebel; David H Smith; Sengwee Toh; Aaron B Caughey Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Ashley V Hill; Maria Perez-Patron; Carmen D Tekwe; Ramkumar Menon; Deanna Hairrell; Brandie D Taylor Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Elyse O Kharbanda; Allison L Naleway; Heather Lipkind; Lakshmi Sukumaran; Natalie L McCarthy; Saad B Omer; Lei Qian; Stanley Xu; Michael L Jackson; Vinutha Vijayadev; Nicola P Klein; James D Nordin Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Elizabeth A Brownell; I Diana Fernandez; Susan G Fisher; Cynthia R Howard; Sharon R Ternullo; Ruth A Lawrence; Joseph W Duckett; Ann M Dozier Journal: Contraception Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 3.375