Literature DB >> 17618747

Accuracy of birth certificate data by risk factors and outcomes: analysis of data from New Jersey.

Nancy E Reichman1, Ofira Schwartz-Soicher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the accuracy of birth certificate data varies by risk factors and birth outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: We reanalyzed data from a validation study of birth certificate data in New Jersey, focusing on subgroups of mothers according to marital status, age, race, ethnicity, English-language proficiency, prenatal care, transfer status, birthweight, and gestational age.
RESULTS: Underreporting of birth certificate data elements varies by maternal characteristics (particularly English-language proficiency), transfer status, and birth outcomes.
CONCLUSION: It is important to consider subgroup variations in data quality when birth certificate data are used for research. Additional studies are needed to explore the sources of variation in data quality and to assess the quality for additional subgroups, across subgroups in other states, in low-risk populations, and of new data items that were introduced in the 2003 revision of the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618747     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  51 in total

1.  Racial and ethnic disparities in low birthweight among urban unmarried mothers.

Authors:  Nancy E Reichman; Erin R Hamilton; Robert A Hummer; Yolanda C Padilla
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-06-15

2.  Ascertainment of medicaid payment for delivery on the iowa birth certificate: is accuracy sufficient for timely policy and program relevant analysis?

Authors:  Debra J Kane; William M Sappenfield
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-05

3.  Assessing the validity and reliability of three indicators self-reported on the pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system survey.

Authors:  Indu B Ahluwalia; Kristen Helms; Brian Morrow
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Gestational age-specific neonatal morbidity among pregnancies complicated by advanced maternal age: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amy M Valent; Tondra Newman; Aimin Chen; Amy Thompson; Emily DeFranco
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-06-05

5.  Unexpected complications of low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Anthony P Nunes; Maureen G Phipps
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Spatial analysis of preterm birth demonstrates opportunities for targeted intervention.

Authors:  Andrew P South; David E Jones; Eric S Hall; Shuyon Huo; Jareen Meinzen-Derr; Lin Liu; James M Greenberg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

7.  Are trends in the proportions of non-medically indicated inductions different by Medicaid status?

Authors:  M Applegate; M Wiggins; J L Bailit
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Establishment of a low birth weight registry and initial outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth Eisenhauer; David E Uddin; Pam Albers; Sara Paton; Robert L Stoughton
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

9.  Development of a linked perinatal data resource from state administrative and community-based program data.

Authors:  Eric S Hall; Neera K Goyal; Robert T Ammerman; Megan M Miller; David E Jones; Jodie A Short; Judith B Van Ginkel
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-01

10.  Place matters: variation in the black/white very preterm birth rate across U.S. metropolitan areas, 2002-2004.

Authors:  Michael R Kramer; Carol R Hogue
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.