Literature DB >> 22753046

Why does picture naming take longer than word reading? The contribution of articulatory processes.

Stéphanie Riès1, Thierry Legou, Borís Burle, F-Xavier Alario, Nicole Malfait.   

Abstract

Since the 19th century, it has been known that response latencies are longer for naming pictures than for reading words aloud. While several interpretations have been proposed, a common general assumption is that this difference stems from cognitive word-selection processes and not from articulatory processes. Here we show that, contrary to this widely accepted view, articulatory processes are also affected by the task performed. To demonstrate this, we used a procedure that to our knowledge had never been used in research on language processing: response-latency fractionating. Along with vocal onsets, we recorded the electromyographic (EMG) activity of facial muscles while participants named pictures or read words aloud. On the basis of these measures, we were able to fractionate the verbal response latencies into two types of time intervals: premotor times (from stimulus presentation to EMG onset), mostly reflecting cognitive processes, and motor times (from EMG onset to vocal onset), related to motor execution processes. We showed that premotor and motor times are both longer in picture naming than in reading, although than in reading, although articulation is already initiated in the latter measure. Future studies based on this new approach should bring valuable clues for a better understanding of the relation between the cognitive and motor processes involved in speech production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22753046     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0287-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition.

Authors:  F X Alario; L Ferrand
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-08

3.  Articulatory duration in single-word speech production.

Authors:  Markus F Damian
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Partial advance information, number of alternatives, and motor processes: an electromyographic study.

Authors:  Camille-Aimé Possamaï; Borís Burle; Allen Osma; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2002-07

5.  Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names.

Authors:  Ardi Roelofs
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

Review 6.  Articulatory phonology: an overview.

Authors:  C P Browman; L Goldstein
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration.

Authors:  Kathleen Rastle; Karen P Croot; Jonathan M Harrington; Max Coltheart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.

Authors:  J Theios; P C Amrhein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Premotor and motor components of reaction time.

Authors:  J Botwinick; L W Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-01

10.  Cascading influences on the production of speech: evidence from articulation.

Authors:  Corey T McMillan; Martin Corley
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-10-13
View more
  12 in total

1.  The time course of visual influences in letter recognition.

Authors:  Sylvain Madec; Kévin Le Goff; Stéphanie K Riès; Thierry Legou; Guillaume Rousselet; Pierre Courrieu; F-Xavier Alario; Jonathan Grainger; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Beta oscillations reflect memory and motor aspects of spoken word production.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Ardi Roelofs; Joost Rommers; Eric Maris
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Articulatory imaging implicates prediction during spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Eleanor Drake; Martin Corley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

4.  Direct electrical stimulation of the left frontal aslant tract disrupts sentence planning without affecting articulation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Chernoff; Max H Sims; Susan O Smith; Webster H Pilcher; Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Corrigendum to "Why does picture naming take longer than word naming? The contribution of articulatory processes".

Authors:  Stéphanie Riès; Thierry Legou; Borís Burle; F-Xavier Alario; Nicole Malfait
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

Review 6.  The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production and reading aloud: evidence and implications.

Authors:  Alan H Kawamoto; Qiang Liu; Christopher T Kello
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-29

7.  The electrophysiology of language production: what could be improved.

Authors:  Vitória Piai; Stéphanie K Riès; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-13

8.  A comparison of two procedures for verbal response time fractionation.

Authors:  Lotje van der Linden; Stéphanie K Riès; Thierry Legou; Borís Burle; Nicole Malfait; F-Xavier Alario
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-24

9.  Cognate Costs in Bilingual Speech Production: Evidence from Language Switching.

Authors:  Mirjam Broersma; Diana Carter; Daniel J Acheson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28

10.  Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in speech monitoring.

Authors:  Stephanie K Riès; Kira Xie; Kathleen Y Haaland; Nina F Dronkers; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.