Literature DB >> 22752163

Methanogenic population and CH₄ production in swedish dairy cows fed different levels of forage.

R Danielsson1, A Schnürer, V Arthurson, J Bertilsson.   

Abstract

Methanogenic community structure, methane production (CH(4)), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) profiles were investigated in Swedish dairy cows fed a diet with a forage/concentrate ratio of 500/500 or 900/100 g/kg of dry matter (DM) of total DM intake (DMI). The rumen methanogenic population was evaluated using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis, 16S rRNA gene libraries, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Mean CH(4) yields did not differ (P > 0.05) between diets, being 16.9 and 20.2 g/kg DMI for the 500/500 and 900/100 diets, respectively. The T-RFLP analysis revealed that populations differed between individual cows and that each individual population responded differently to the diets. The 16S rRNA gene libraries revealed that Methanobrevibacter spp. dominated for both diets. CH(4) production was positively correlated with a dominance of sequences representing T-RFs related to Methanobrevibacter thaueri, Methanobrevibacter millerae, and Methanobrevibacter smithii relative to Methanobrevibacter ruminantium and Methanobrevibacter olleyae. Total numbers of methanogens and total numbers of Methanobacteriales were significantly higher with the 500/500 diet (P < 0.0004 and P < 0.002, respectively). However, no relationship was found between CH(4) production and total number of methanogens. No differences were seen in total VFA, propionic acid, or acetic acid contents, but the molar proportion of butyric acid in the rumen was higher for the 500/500 diet than for the 900/100 diet (P < 0.05). Interestingly, the results also revealed that a division of the identified methanogenic species into two groups, suggested in the work of King et al. (E. E. King, R. P. Smith, B. St-Pierre, and A. D. G. Wright, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:5682-5687, 2011), increased the understanding of the variation in CH(4) production between different cows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22752163      PMCID: PMC3416586          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00675-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  Molecular diversity of rumen methanogens from sheep in Western Australia.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Andrew J Williams; Barbara Winder; Claus T Christophersen; Sharon L Rodgers; Kellie D Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Molecular diversity of methanogens in feedlot cattle from Ontario and Prince Edward Island, Canada.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Clare H Auckland; Denis H Lynn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Impact of high-concentrate feeding and low ruminal pH on methanogens and protozoa in the rumen of dairy cows.

Authors:  Sarah E Hook; Michael A Steele; Korinne S Northwood; André-Denis G Wright; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Methanobrevibacter millerae sp. nov. and Methanobrevibacter olleyae sp. nov., methanogens from the ovine and bovine rumen that can utilize formate for growth.

Authors:  Suzanne Rea; John P Bowman; Sam Popovski; Carolyn Pimm; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen.

Authors:  M F Whitford; R M Teather; R J Forster
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Methanobrevibacter phylotypes are the dominant methanogens in sheep from Venezuela.

Authors:  André-Denis G Wright; Xuanli Ma; Nestor E Obispo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2007-12-29       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Assessment of the microbial ecology of ruminal methanogens in cattle with different feed efficiencies.

Authors:  Mi Zhou; Emma Hernandez-Sanabria; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Methane emissions from cattle.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 10.  Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Sarah E Hook; André-Denis G Wright; Brian W McBride
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.273

View more
  23 in total

1.  Influence of Diet Composition on Cattle Rumen Methanogenesis: A Comparative Metagenomic Analysis in Indian and Exotic Cattle.

Authors:  Nidhi R Parmar; Prabhakar D Pandit; Hemant J Purohit; J I Nirmal Kumar; Chaitanya G Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Examination of the rumen bacteria and methanogenic archaea of wild impalas (Aepyceros melampus melampus) from Pongola, South Africa.

Authors:  Laura M Cersosimo; Hannah Lachance; Benoit St-Pierre; Wouter van Hoven; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Differences in the methanogen population exist in sika deer (Cervus nippon) fed different diets in China.

Authors:  Zhi Peng Li; Han Lu Liu; Chun Ai Jin; Xue Zhe Cui; Yi Jing; Fu He Yang; Guang Yu Li; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Rumen and Cecum Microbiomes in Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) Are Changed in Response to a Lichen Diet and May Affect Enteric Methane Emissions.

Authors:  Alejandro Salgado-Flores; Live H Hagen; Suzanne L Ishaq; Mirzaman Zamanzadeh; André-Denis G Wright; Phillip B Pope; Monica A Sundset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Methane Production in Dairy Cows Correlates with Rumen Methanogenic and Bacterial Community Structure.

Authors:  Rebecca Danielsson; Johan Dicksved; Li Sun; Horacio Gonda; Bettina Müller; Anna Schnürer; Jan Bertilsson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Assessment of Ruminal Bacterial and Archaeal Community Structure in Yak (Bos grunniens).

Authors:  Zhenming Zhou; Lei Fang; Qingxiang Meng; Shengli Li; Shatuo Chai; Shujie Liu; Jan Thomas Schonewille
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  The ruminal microbiome associated with methane emissions from ruminant livestock.

Authors:  Ilma Tapio; Timothy J Snelling; Francesco Strozzi; R John Wallace
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-19

8.  Response of the Rumen Microbiota of Sika Deer (Cervus nippon) Fed Different Concentrations of Tannin Rich Plants.

Authors:  Zhipeng Li; André-Denis G Wright; Hanlu Liu; Zhongyuan Fan; Fuhe Yang; Zhigang Zhang; Guangyu Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Characterization of microbial community structure during continuous anaerobic digestion of straw and cow manure.

Authors:  Li Sun; Phillip B Pope; Vincent G H Eijsink; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.813

10.  Influence of periparturient and postpartum diets on rumen methanogen communities in three breeds of primiparous dairy cows.

Authors:  Laura M Cersosimo; Melissa L Bainbridge; Jana Kraft; André-Denis G Wright
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.