Literature DB >> 22749495

Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage defects.

Joshua D Harris1, Robert H Brophy, Guang Jia, Brandon Price, Michael Knopp, Robert A Siston, David C Flanigan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chondral defects within the patellofemoral compartment are common and lack the ability to heal on their own. Early detection of these lesions with a noninvasive modality would be beneficial in delaying or preventing their possible progression to osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive, specific, and accurate imaging modality for the detection of patellofemoral chondral defects with substantial interobserver reliability and that MRI has a higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting patellar defects than trochlear defects.
METHODS: A systematic review of multiple medical databases was performed by use of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. Analysis of studies that reported diagnostic performance of MRI in the assessment of patellofemoral chondral defects (patella and trochlea), using arthroscopy as the reference gold standard, was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver reliability were reported. Significant heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis.
RESULTS: MRI was more sensitive in detection of patellar (87%) versus trochlear (72%) defects. MRI was similarly specific for patellar (86%) and trochlear (89%) defects. MRI was similarly accurate for patellar (84%) and trochlear (83%) defects. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for both patellar and trochlear defects.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI is a highly sensitive, specific, and accurate noninvasive diagnostic modality for the detection of chondral defects in the patellofemoral compartment of the knee, using arthroscopy as the reference gold standard. Although there was wide variability in the statistical parameters assessed, MRI was more sensitive for detection of patellar versus trochlear defects and similarly specific and accurate for patellar and trochlear defects. Interobserver reliability is substantial to near perfect in the assessment of these lesions, without a significant difference between patellar and trochlear defects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Use of MRI may allow early detection of chondral defects within the patellofemoral compartment, enabling clinicians to adopt strategies to delay or prevent progression to osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of Level I, II, and III studies.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749495     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  15 in total

1.  Injury patterns of medial patellofemoral ligament after acute lateral patellar dislocation in children: Correlation analysis with anatomical variants and articular cartilage lesion of the patella.

Authors:  Guang-Ying Zhang; Lei Zheng; Hao Shi; Bing-Jun Ji; Yan Feng; Hong-Yu Ding
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance tomography of the knee joint.

Authors:  Stefan Puig; Yojena Chittazhathu Kurian Kuruvilla; Lukas Ebner; Gottfried Endel
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Comparison of a fast 5-min knee MRI protocol with a standard knee MRI protocol: a multi-institutional multi-reader study.

Authors:  Erin FitzGerald Alaia; Alex Benedick; Nancy A Obuchowski; Joshua M Polster; Luis S Beltran; Jean Schils; Elisabeth Garwood; Christopher J Burke; I-Yuan Joseph Chang; Soterios Gyftopoulos; Naveen Subhas
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Diagnosis and classification of chondral knee injuries: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy.

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius Danieli; João Paulo Fernandes Guerreiro; Alexandre deOliveira Queiroz; Hamilton daRosa Pereira; Susi Tagima; Marcelo Garcia Marini; Daniele Cristina Cataneo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect patellofemoral focal cartilage injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Xará-Leite; André Vinha; Cristina Valente; Renato Andrade; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.114

6.  Patellofemoral pain: an update on diagnostic and treatment options.

Authors:  Moira M McCarthy; Sabrina M Strickland
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

7.  Cartilage status in knees with recurrent patellar instability using magnetic resonance imaging T2 relaxation time value.

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Wei Wang; Hanlong Xin; Yue Wang; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Investigation of the Relationship between Anterior Knee Pain and Chondromalacia Patellae and Patellofemoral Malalignment.

Authors:  Idil Kurut Aysin; Ayhan Askin; Berna Dirim Mete; Ece Guvendi; Murat Aysin; Hikmet Kocyigit
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2018-02-01

9.  Chondral Injury in Patellofemoral Instability.

Authors:  Timothy Lording; Sébastien Lustig; Elvire Servien; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Arthroscopic patelloplasty and circumpatellar denervation for the treatment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Gang Zhao; Yujie Liu; Bangtuo Yuan; Xuezhen Shen; Feng Qu; Jiangtao Wang; Wei Qi; Juanli Zhu; Yang Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.