Literature DB >> 22749406

Three-dimensional (3D) microarchitecture correlations with 2D projection image gray-level variations assessed by trabecular bone score using high-resolution computed tomographic acquisitions: effects of resolution and noise.

Renaud Winzenrieth1, Franck Michelet2, Didier Hans3.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to determine the level of correlation between the 3-dimensional (3D) characteristics of trabecular bone microarchitecture, as evaluated using microcomputed tomography (μCT) reconstruction, and trabecular bone score (TBS), as evaluated using 2D projection images directly derived from 3D μCT reconstruction (TBSμCT). Moreover, we have evaluated the effects of image degradation (resolution and noise) and X-ray energy of projection on these correlations. Thirty human cadaveric vertebrae were acquired on a microscanner at an isotropic resolution of 93 μm. The 3D microarchitecture parameters were obtained using MicroView (GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, MI). The 2D projections of these 3D models were generated using the Beer-Lambert law at different X-ray energies. Degradation of image resolution was simulated (from 93 to 1488 μm). Relationships between 3D microarchitecture parameters and TBSμCT at different resolutions were evaluated using linear regression analysis. Significant correlations were observed between TBSμCT and 3D microarchitecture parameters, regardless of the resolution. Correlations were detected that were strongly to intermediately positive for connectivity density (0.711 ≤ r² ≤ 0.752) and trabecular number (0.584 ≤ r² ≤ 0.648) and negative for trabecular space (-0.407 ≤ r² ≤ -0.491), up to a pixel size of 1023 μm. In addition, TBSμCT values were strongly correlated between each other (0.77 ≤ r² ≤ 0.96). Study results show that the correlations between TBSμCT at 93 μm and 3D microarchitecture parameters are weakly impacted by the degradation of image resolution and the presence of noise.
Copyright © 2013 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D projection; 3D/2D correlation; resolution; trabecular bone microarchitecture; trabecular bone score

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749406     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  69 in total

1.  Regional body fat depots differently affect bone microarchitecture in postmenopausal Korean women.

Authors:  J H Kim; H J Choi; E J Ku; A R Hong; K M Kim; S W Kim; N H Cho; C S Shin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Optimal sample volumes of human trabecular bone in μCT analysis within vertebral body and femoral head.

Authors:  Xin-Xin Wen; Chun-Lin Zong; Chao Xu; Xiang-Yu Ma; Fa-Qi Wang; Ya-Fei Feng; Ya-Bo Yan; Wei Lei
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 3.  Utility of the trabecular bone score (TBS) in secondary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Fabio M Ulivieri; Barbara C Silva; Francesco Sardanelli; Didier Hans; John P Bilezikian; Renata Caudarella
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Image Resolution and TBS Precision.

Authors:  Robert D Blank
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  THE MEASUREMENT OF BONE QUALITY USING GRAY LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCE MATRIX TEXTURAL FEATURES.

Authors:  Mukul Shirvaikar; Ning Huang; Xuanliang Neil Dong
Journal:  J Med Imaging Health Inform       Date:  2016-10

6.  The influence of lactation on BMD measurements and TBS: a 12-month follow-up study.

Authors:  F M F Grizzo; M de Andrade Pereira; L B M Marchiotti; F Guilhem; T da Silva Santos; C M Dell' Agnolo; W A de Melo; M de Medeiros Pinheiro; M D de Barros Carvalho; S M Pelloso
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Alessandro Poloni; Vito Chianca; Domenico Albano; Luca Petruccio Piodi; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Use of trabecular bone score for risk stratification of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Jad G Sfeir; Tito D Pena Guzman; Lucia Bedatsova; Stephen M Broski; Matthew T Drake
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The trabecular bone score is associated with bone mineral density, markers of bone turnover and prevalent fracture in patients with end stage kidney disease.

Authors:  J Aleksova; S Kurniawan; G J Elder
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Gabriele Maffi; Jacopo Antonino Vitale; Fabio Massimo Ulivieri; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.