Literature DB >> 22749314

Performance of an item response theory-based computer adaptive test in identifying functional decline.

Andrea L Cheville1, Kathleen J Yost, Dirk R Larson, Katiuska Dos Santos, Megan M O'Byrne, Megan T Chang, Terry M Therneau, Felix E Diehn, Ping Yang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To achieve a low respondent burden and increase the responsiveness of functional measurement by using an item response theory-based computer adaptive test (CAT), the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) CAT.
DESIGN: Two-year prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Telephonic assessments from a quaternary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=311) with late-stage lung cancer (LC).
INTERVENTIONS: Monthly assessments for up to 2 years. Disease progression was determined via record abstraction. Anchor-based responsiveness techniques were used to compare AM-PAC-CAT score changes between global rating of change (GRC) question response levels, as well as between intervals when adverse clinical events or symptom worsening did and did not occur. Distribution-based responsiveness assessments included calculation of the standardized effect size (SES) and standardized response mean (SRM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AM-PAC-CAT, symptom numerical rating scales, and a GRC.
RESULTS: Administration time averaged 112 seconds over 2543 interviews. AM-PAC-CAT score changes became more positive as GRC responses reflected more improved states: a lot worse (-11.62), a little worse (-1.92), the same (-.10), a little better (1.01), and a lot better (2.82). Score changes were negative when associated with adverse clinical events. The SES and SRM for score differences between 1 to 2 and 9 to 10 months prior to death were -.87 and -1.13, respectively. The minimally important difference estimate was defined by the mean CAT session SE at 2.0.
CONCLUSIONS: The AM-PAC-CAT imposes a low, <2-minute, respondent burden, and distribution- and anchor-based methods suggest that is moderately responsive in patients with late-stage LC.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749314      PMCID: PMC3740969          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  48 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness.

Authors:  Dennis Wallace; Pamela W Duncan; Sue Min Lai
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Using the entire cohort in the receiver operating characteristic analysis maximizes precision of the minimal important difference.

Authors:  Dan Turner; Holger J Schünemann; Lauren E Griffith; Dorcas E Beaton; Anne M Griffiths; Jeffrey N Critch; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Comparison of the responsiveness of lupus disease activity measures to changes in systemic lupus erythematosus activity relevant to patients and physicians.

Authors:  Erika Chang; Michal Abrahamowicz; Diane Ferland; Paul R Fortin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Physical functioning of elderly cancer patients prior to diagnosis and following initial treatment.

Authors:  B Given; C Given; F Azzouz; M Stommel
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; T R Mendoza; X S Wang; C Chou; M T Harle; M Morrissey; M C Engstrom
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening.

Authors:  David Cella; Elizabeth A Hahn; Kelly Dineen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The detection and treatment of cancer-related functional problems in an outpatient setting.

Authors:  A L Cheville; L A Beck; T L Petersen; R S Marks; G L Gamble
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Validating and assessing the sensitivity of the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index-derived Short Form-6D in patients with early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sogol S Amjadi; Paul M Maranian; Harold E Paulus; Robert M Kaplan; Veena K Ranganath; Daniel E Furst; Puja P Khanna; Dinesh Khanna
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  A critical look at transition ratings.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Geoffrey R Norman; Elizabeth F Juniper; Lauren E Griffith
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  14 in total

1.  Imaging and Clinical Characteristics Predict Near-Term Disablement From Bone Metastases: Implications for Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Naveen S Murthy; Jeffrey R Basford; Peter S Rose; Kenny Tran; Thomas P Pittelkow; Michael D Ringler
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  How Receptive Are Patients With Late Stage Cancer to Rehabilitation Services and What Are the Sources of Their Resistance?

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Lori Rhudy; Jeffrey R Basford; Joan M Griffin; Ann Marie Flores
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Assessment of Cancer-Associated Cachexia - How to Approach Physical Function Evaluation.

Authors:  Julia Fram; Caroline Vail; Ishan Roy
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Nested Cohort Study to Identify Characteristics That Predict Near-Term Disablement From Lung Cancer Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Jeffrey R Basford; Ian Parney; Ping Yang; Felix E Diehn
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Clinically Integrated Physical Therapist Practice in Cancer Care: A New Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Christopher A Barnes; Nicole L Stout; Thomas K Varghese; Cornelia M Ulrich; Daniel R Couriel; Catherine J Lee; Christopher S Noren; Paul C LaStayo
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-03-10

6.  Comparing PROMIS computer-adaptive tests to the Brief Symptom Inventory in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  George Baum; Karen Basen-Engquist; Maria C Swartz; Patricia A Parker; Cindy L Carmack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-16       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  An exercise oncology clinical pathway: Screening and referral for personalized interventions.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Justin C Brown; Anna L Schwartz; Timothy F Marshall; Anna M Campbell; Larissa Nekhlyudov; David S Zucker; Karen M Basen-Engquist; Grace Campbell; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Andrea L Cheville; Kelley R Covington; Jennifer A Ligibel; Jonas M Sokolof; Kathryn H Schmitz; Catherine M Alfano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Effect of Collaborative Telerehabilitation on Functional Impairment and Pain Among Patients With Advanced-Stage Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Timothy Moynihan; Jeph Herrin; Charles Loprinzi; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

9.  Improving the Delivery of Function-Directed Care During Acute Hospitalizations: Methods to Develop and Validate the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test (FAMCAT).

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Chun Wang; Kathleen J Yost; Jeanne A Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Pengsheng Ni; Elizabeth Marfeo; Tamra Keeney; Jeffrey R Basford; David J Weiss
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-02-16

10.  Does the Mode of PROM Administration Affect the Responses of Hospitalized Patients?

Authors:  David J Weiss; Chun Wang; Jeffrey R Basford; King Yiu Suen; Isabella M Alvarado; Andrea Cheville
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.