OBJECTIVE: To achieve a low respondent burden and increase the responsiveness of functional measurement by using an item response theory-based computer adaptive test (CAT), the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) CAT. DESIGN: Two-year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Telephonic assessments from a quaternary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=311) with late-stage lung cancer (LC). INTERVENTIONS: Monthly assessments for up to 2 years. Disease progression was determined via record abstraction. Anchor-based responsiveness techniques were used to compare AM-PAC-CAT score changes between global rating of change (GRC) question response levels, as well as between intervals when adverse clinical events or symptom worsening did and did not occur. Distribution-based responsiveness assessments included calculation of the standardized effect size (SES) and standardized response mean (SRM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AM-PAC-CAT, symptom numerical rating scales, and a GRC. RESULTS: Administration time averaged 112 seconds over 2543 interviews. AM-PAC-CAT score changes became more positive as GRC responses reflected more improved states: a lot worse (-11.62), a little worse (-1.92), the same (-.10), a little better (1.01), and a lot better (2.82). Score changes were negative when associated with adverse clinical events. The SES and SRM for score differences between 1 to 2 and 9 to 10 months prior to death were -.87 and -1.13, respectively. The minimally important difference estimate was defined by the mean CAT session SE at 2.0. CONCLUSIONS: The AM-PAC-CAT imposes a low, <2-minute, respondent burden, and distribution- and anchor-based methods suggest that is moderately responsive in patients with late-stage LC.
OBJECTIVE: To achieve a low respondent burden and increase the responsiveness of functional measurement by using an item response theory-based computer adaptive test (CAT), the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) CAT. DESIGN: Two-year prospective cohort study. SETTING: Telephonic assessments from a quaternary medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=311) with late-stage lung cancer (LC). INTERVENTIONS: Monthly assessments for up to 2 years. Disease progression was determined via record abstraction. Anchor-based responsiveness techniques were used to compare AM-PAC-CAT score changes between global rating of change (GRC) question response levels, as well as between intervals when adverse clinical events or symptom worsening did and did not occur. Distribution-based responsiveness assessments included calculation of the standardized effect size (SES) and standardized response mean (SRM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AM-PAC-CAT, symptom numerical rating scales, and a GRC. RESULTS: Administration time averaged 112 seconds over 2543 interviews. AM-PAC-CAT score changes became more positive as GRC responses reflected more improved states: a lot worse (-11.62), a little worse (-1.92), the same (-.10), a little better (1.01), and a lot better (2.82). Score changes were negative when associated with adverse clinical events. The SES and SRM for score differences between 1 to 2 and 9 to 10 months prior to death were -.87 and -1.13, respectively. The minimally important difference estimate was defined by the mean CAT session SE at 2.0. CONCLUSIONS: The AM-PAC-CAT imposes a low, <2-minute, respondent burden, and distribution- and anchor-based methods suggest that is moderately responsive in patients with late-stage LC.
Authors: Dan Turner; Holger J Schünemann; Lauren E Griffith; Dorcas E Beaton; Anne M Griffiths; Jeffrey N Critch; Gordon H Guyatt Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Sogol S Amjadi; Paul M Maranian; Harold E Paulus; Robert M Kaplan; Veena K Ranganath; Daniel E Furst; Puja P Khanna; Dinesh Khanna Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Andrea L Cheville; Naveen S Murthy; Jeffrey R Basford; Peter S Rose; Kenny Tran; Thomas P Pittelkow; Michael D Ringler Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-10-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Andrea L Cheville; Lori Rhudy; Jeffrey R Basford; Joan M Griffin; Ann Marie Flores Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Andrea L Cheville; Jeffrey R Basford; Ian Parney; Ping Yang; Felix E Diehn Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Christopher A Barnes; Nicole L Stout; Thomas K Varghese; Cornelia M Ulrich; Daniel R Couriel; Catherine J Lee; Christopher S Noren; Paul C LaStayo Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2020-03-10
Authors: George Baum; Karen Basen-Engquist; Maria C Swartz; Patricia A Parker; Cindy L Carmack Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-02-16 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Nicole L Stout; Justin C Brown; Anna L Schwartz; Timothy F Marshall; Anna M Campbell; Larissa Nekhlyudov; David S Zucker; Karen M Basen-Engquist; Grace Campbell; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; Andrea L Cheville; Kelley R Covington; Jennifer A Ligibel; Jonas M Sokolof; Kathryn H Schmitz; Catherine M Alfano Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Andrea L Cheville; Chun Wang; Kathleen J Yost; Jeanne A Teresi; Mildred Ramirez; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; Pengsheng Ni; Elizabeth Marfeo; Tamra Keeney; Jeffrey R Basford; David J Weiss Journal: Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Date: 2021-02-16
Authors: David J Weiss; Chun Wang; Jeffrey R Basford; King Yiu Suen; Isabella M Alvarado; Andrea Cheville Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 4.060