Literature DB >> 22749295

Psychometric properties of selected tests in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Joshua A Cleland1, Julie M Whitman, Janet L Houser, Robert S Wainner, John D Childs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The psychometric properties of many outcome tools commonly used with patients with lumbar spinal stenosis have yet to be examined.
PURPOSE: Examine the test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and minimum levels of detectable and clinically important differences for several outcome measures in a cohort of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: Cohort secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis receiving outpatient physical therapy. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifty-five patients (mean age, 69.5 years; standard deviation, ±7.9 years; 43.1% females) presenting with lumbar spinal stenosis to physical therapy. OUTCOME MEASURES: The Modified Oswestry Disability Index, Modified Swiss Spinal Stenosis Scale (SSS), Patient Specific Functional Scale, and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
METHODS: All patients completed the Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, Patient Specific Functional Scale, and NPRS at the baseline examination and at a follow-up. In addition, patients completed a 15-point Global Rating of Change at follow-up, which was used to categorize whether patients experienced clinically meaningful change. Changes in the Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, Patient Specific Functional Scale, and NPRS were then used to assess test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and minimum levels of detectable and clinically important differences.
RESULTS: The Oswestry Disability Index was the only outcome measure to exhibit excellent test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.93). All others ranged between fair and moderate. The Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, and Patient Specific Functional Scale exhibited varying levels of responsiveness, each of which was superior to the NPRS. The minimal clinically important difference for the Oswestry Disability Index was five points, the SSS was 0.36 and 0.10 for symptoms subscale and functional subscale, respectively, 1.3 for the Patient Specific Functional Scale, and for the NPRS, 1.25 for back/buttock symptoms and 1.5 for thigh/leg symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study indicate that the Oswestry Disability Index, SSS, and Patient Specific Functional Scale possess adequate psychometric properties to be used in the outcome assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. However, further investigation is needed to validate these findings in other samples of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and nonspecific low back pain.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22749295     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  30 in total

1.  Effect of spinal manipulative therapy on mechanical pain sensitivity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a pilot randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Bryan M Bond; Chris D Kinslow; Adam W Yoder; Wen Liu
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-03-05

2.  Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients.

Authors:  Jacquelyn S Pennings; Clinton J Devin; Inamullah Khan; Mohamad Bydon; Anthony L Asher; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation of the German version of the spinal stenosis measure.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Johann Steurer; Lukas M Wildi; Ulrike Held
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A comparison between different outcome measures based on "meaningful important differences" in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Franziska Christina Buletti; Ulrike Held; Eva Rasmussen-Barr; Sherri Weiser; Jakob M Burgstaller; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Effect of BMI on the clinical outcome following microsurgical decompression in over-the-top technique: bi-centric study with an analysis of 744 patients.

Authors:  Tamara Herold; Ralph Kothe; Christoph J Siepe; Oliver Heese; Wolfgang Hitzl; Andreas Korge; Karin Wuertz-Kozak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Oral steroids for acute radiculopathy due to a herniated lumbar disk: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Harley Goldberg; William Firtch; Mark Tyburski; Alice Pressman; Lynn Ackerson; Luisa Hamilton; Wayne Smith; Ryan Carver; Annu Maratukulam; Lawrence A Won; Eugene Carragee; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Pain Provocation and the Energy Cost of Walking: A Matched Comparison Study of Older Adults With and Without Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Peter C Coyle; Jenifer M Pugliese; J Megan Sions; Mark S Eskander; Jennifer A Schrack; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther       Date:  2019 Oct/Dec       Impact factor: 3.381

8.  Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients.

Authors:  Julie Schwind; Kenneth Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Christopher Showalter; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

9.  A randomized clinical trial comparing extensible and inextensible lumbosacral orthoses and standard care alone in the management of lower back pain.

Authors:  David C Morrisette; Jacek Cholewicki; Sarah Logan; Gretchen Seif; Stephanie McGowan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ripul Panchal; Ryan Denhaese; Clint Hill; K Brandon Strenge; Alexandre DE Moura; Peter Passias; Paul Arnold; Andrew Cappuccino; M David Dennis; Andy Kranenburg; Brieta Ventimiglia; Kim Martin; Chris Ferry; Sarah Martineck; Camille Moore; Kee Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.