Literature DB >> 31190294

Prediction of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) using PROMIS-29 in a national sample of lumbar spine surgery patients.

Jacquelyn S Pennings1,2, Clinton J Devin1,3, Inamullah Khan1, Mohamad Bydon4, Anthony L Asher5, Kristin R Archer6,7,8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to examine the measurement properties of the PROMIS-29 to better understand its use in patients undergoing spine surgery. A secondary objective was to calculate a predictive equation between PROMIS-29 and ODI, to allow clinicians and researchers to determine a predicted ODI score based on PROMIS short form scores.
METHODS: 719 patients with PROMIS v2.0 and ODI responses were queried from the quality outcomes database. Validity was assessed using coefficient omega, ceiling/floor effects, and confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariable regression predicting ODI scores from PROMIS-29 domains was used to create a predictive equation. Predicted ODI scores were plotted against ODI scores to determine how well PROMIS-29 domains predicted ODI.
RESULTS: Results showed good reliability and validity of PROMIS-29 in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: convergent and discriminant validity, low floor/ceiling effects, and unidimensional domains. The conversion equation used 6 PROMIS-29 domains (ODI% =  37.847- 1.475*[PFraw] + 1.842*[PAINraw] + 0.557*[SDraw] - 0.642*[SRraw] + 0.478*[PIraw] + 0.295*[DEPraw]). Correlation between the predicted and actual ODI scores was R = 0.88, R2 = 0.78, suggesting that the equation predicted ODI scores that are strongly correlated with actual ODI scores.
CONCLUSIONS: Good measurement properties support the use of PROMIS-29 in spine surgery patients. Findings suggest accurate ODI scores can be derived from PROMIS-29 domains. Clinicians who want to move from ODI to PROMIS-29 can use this equation to obtain estimated ODI scores when only collecting PROMIS-29. These results support the idea that PROMIS-29 domains have the potential to replace disease-specific traditional PROMs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Oswestry Disability Index; PROMIS-29; Patient-reported outcomes; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31190294     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02223-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  53 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires.

Authors:  Margaret Grotle; Jens I Brox; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain.

Authors:  Montserrat Ferrer; Ferran Pellisé; Oscar Escudero; Luis Alvarez; Angels Pont; Jordi Alonso; Richard Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Use and abuse of Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  Jeremy C T Fairbank
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness.

Authors:  Megan Davidson; Jennifer L Keating
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-01

6.  Missing data on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a comparison of 4 imputation techniques.

Authors:  Christine Bono; L Douglas Ried; Carole Kimberlin; Bruce Vogel
Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm       Date:  2007-03

7.  Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.

Authors:  Thomas L Walsh; Brett Hanscom; Jon D Lurie; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. a two-year follow-up of spine surgery patients.

Authors:  R O Niskanen
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.360

9.  Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.

Authors:  Anne G Copay; Steven D Glassman; Brian R Subach; Sigurd Berven; Thomas C Schuler; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hill; Kate M Dunn; Martyn Lewis; Ricky Mullis; Chris J Main; Nadine E Foster; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-05-15
View more
  4 in total

1.  Mapping PROMIS physical function and pain interference to the modified low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  Nicolas R Thompson; Brittany R Lapin; Michael P Steinmetz; Edward C Benzel; Irene L Katzan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.440

2.  Prediction Models in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Lubelski; Andrew Hersh; Tej D Azad; Jeff Ehresman; Zachary Pennington; Kurt Lehner; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-04

3.  Linking Oswestry Disability Index to the PROMIS pain interference CAT with equipercentile methods.

Authors:  Xiaodan Tang; Benjamin D Schalet; Man Hung; Darrel S Brodke; Charles L Saltzman; David Cella
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Effects of Online Home Nursing Care Model Application on Patients with Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Qiao-Ping Li; Jing Li; Hong-Ying Pan
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-04-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.