Literature DB >> 30998562

Pain Provocation and the Energy Cost of Walking: A Matched Comparison Study of Older Adults With and Without Chronic Low Back Pain With Radiculopathy.

Peter C Coyle1,2, Jenifer M Pugliese2, J Megan Sions2, Mark S Eskander3, Jennifer A Schrack4,5, Gregory E Hicks2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Chronic low back pain with radiculopathy (CLBPR) is common among older adults and can lead to walking difficulty. Energy cost of walking strongly predicts changes in walking speed, which is predictive of mortality in older adults. The purposes of this study were to examine (1) the impact of pain provocation on the energy cost of walking and (2) the relationship between pain intensity and change in energy cost of walking.
METHODS: Older adults (60-85 years) with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) CLBPR were matched on age, sex, and diabetes presence/absence. Energy cost of walking was measured with a portable metabolic gas analyzer, as participants walked for 20 minutes or less. Energy cost and pain measurements occurred during early and late stages of walking. Percent change in energy cost was calculated. Participants were grouped by their pain response during walking: increased pain (n = 13); consistent pain (n = 7); no pain, matched to individuals with increased pain (n = 13); and no pain, matched to individuals with consistent pain (n = 7). We examined the within-groups change in energy cost for all groups, as well as the relationship between late-stage pain intensity and percent change of energy cost for individuals whose pain increased. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Within the increased pain group, energy cost of walking significantly increased from early to late stages (median change = 0.003 mL/kg/m, P = .006), and late-stage pain intensity explained 41.2% (p = 0.040) of the variance in percent change. Since pain appears to be linked to energy cost, effective pain management with walking may be an important factor in preventing mobility decline.
CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults with CLBPR, pain provocation drives increases in the energy cost of walking. Because high energy cost of walking is predictive of mobility decline, clinicians may focus on effective pain management strategies during walking, which may potentially decrease the risk of mobility decline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30998562      PMCID: PMC6783346          DOI: 10.1519/JPT.0000000000000212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Phys Ther        ISSN: 1539-8412            Impact factor:   3.381


  40 in total

1.  Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery.

Authors:  J M Guralnik; L Ferrucci; C F Pieper; S G Leveille; K S Markides; G V Ostir; S Studenski; L F Berkman; R B Wallace
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Energy cost of walking and gait instability in healthy 65- and 80-yr-olds.

Authors:  Davide Malatesta; David Simar; Yves Dauvilliers; Robin Candau; Fabio Borrani; Christian Prefaut; Corinne Caillaud
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-07-25

3.  Quantification of changes in gait characteristics associated with intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Koutatsu Nagai; Tomoki Aoyama; Minoru Yamada; Masanori Izeki; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Shu Nishiguchi; Tadao Tsuboyama; Masashi Neo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2014-06

4.  Comparison of the metabolic energy cost of overground and treadmill walking in older adults.

Authors:  Nicolas Berryman; Mathieu Gayda; Anil Nigam; Martin Juneau; Louis Bherer; Laurent Bosquet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Trunk muscle composition as a predictor of reduced functional capacity in the health, aging and body composition study: the moderating role of back pain.

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Eleanor M Simonsick; Tamara B Harris; Anne B Newman; Debra K Weiner; Michael A Nevitt; Frances A Tylavsky
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Walking economy before and after the onset of claudication pain in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Andrew W Gardner; Raphael M Ritti-Dias; Julie A Stoner; Polly S Montgomery; Kristy J Scott; Steve M Blevins
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Low back pain and disability in older women: independent association with difficulty but not inability to perform daily activities.

Authors:  S G Leveille; J M Guralnik; M Hochberg; R Hirsch; L Ferrucci; J Langlois; T Rantanen; S Ling
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.053

8.  Performance measures predict onset of activity of daily living difficulty in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Wen-Ni Wennie Huang; Subashan Perera; Jessie VanSwearingen; Stephanie Studenski
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Psychometric properties of commonly used low back disability questionnaires: are they useful for older adults with low back pain?

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Tara J Manal
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  The impact of chronic low back pain on older adults: a comparative study of patients and controls.

Authors:  Thomas E Rudy; Debra K Weiner; Susan J Lieber; Jill Slaboda; Robert J Boston
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 7.926

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Standardized Assessment of Movement-evoked Pain Ratings Is Associated With Functional Outcomes in Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Patrick J Knox; Corey B Simon; Ryan T Pohlig; Jenifer M Pugliese; Peter C Coyle; Jaclyn M Sions; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 2.  Do people with low back pain walk differently? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jo Armour Smith; Heidi Stabbert; Jennifer J Bagwell; Hsiang-Ling Teng; Vernie Wade; Szu-Ping Lee
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 13.077

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.