Literature DB >> 22747878

Laboratory studies on surface sampling of Bacillus anthracis contamination: summary, gaps and recommendations.

G F Piepel1, B G Amidan, R Hu.   

Abstract

This article summarizes previous laboratory studies to characterize the performance of methods for collecting, storing/transporting, processing and analysing samples from surfaces contaminated by Bacillus anthracis or related surrogates. The focus is on plate culture and count estimates of surface contamination for swab, wipe and vacuum samples of porous and nonporous surfaces. Summaries of the previous studies and their results were assessed to identify gaps in information needed as inputs to calculate key parameters critical to risk management in biothreat incidents. One key parameter is the number of samples needed to make characterization or clearance decisions with specified statistical confidence. Other key parameters include the ability to calculate, following contamination incidents, the (i) estimates of B. anthracis contamination, as well as the bias and uncertainties in the estimates and (ii) confidence in characterization and clearance decisions for contaminated or decontaminated buildings. Gaps in knowledge and understanding identified during the summary of the studies are discussed. Additional work is needed to quantify (i) the false-negative rates of surface-sampling methods with lower concentrations on various surfaces and (ii) the effects on performance characteristics of: aerosol vs liquid deposition of spores, using surrogates instead of B. anthracis, real-world vs laboratory conditions and storage and transportation conditions. Recommendations are given for future evaluations of data from existing studies and possible new studies.
© 2012 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22747878     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05381.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  7 in total

1.  False-negative rate and recovery efficiency performance of a validated sponge wipe sampling method.

Authors:  Paula A Krauter; Greg F Piepel; Raymond Boucher; Matt Tezak; Brett G Amidan; Wayne Einfeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of surface sampling methods for an extended duration outdoor biological contamination study.

Authors:  Anne M Mikelonis; Ahmed Abdel-Hady; Denise Aslett; Katherine Ratliff; Abderrahmane Touati; John Archer; Shannon Serre; Leroy Mickelsen; Sarah Taft; M W Calfee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Biological Validation of a Chemical Effluent Decontamination System.

Authors:  Christopher K Cote; Jessica M Weidner; Christopher Klimko; Ashley E Piper; Jeremy A Miller; Melissa Hunter; Jennifer L Shoe; Jennifer C Hoover; Brian R Sauerbry; Tony Buhr; Joel A Bozue; David E Harbourt; Pamela J Glass
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2021-03-19

4.  Evaluation of standardized sample collection, packaging, and decontamination procedures to assess cross-contamination potential during Bacillus anthracis incident response operations.

Authors:  M Worth Calfee; Jenia Tufts; Kathryn Meyer; Katrina McConkey; Leroy Mickelsen; Laura Rose; Chad Dowell; Lisa Delaney; Angela Weber; Stephen Morse; Jasmine Chaitram; Marshall Gray
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Comparative evaluation of vacuum-based surface sampling methods for collection of Bacillus spores.

Authors:  M Worth Calfee; Laura J Rose; Stephen Morse; Dino Mattorano; Matt Clayton; Abderrahmane Touati; Nicole Griffin-Gatchalian; Christina Slone; Neal McSweeney
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Evaluating Composite Sampling Methods of Bacillus Spores at Low Concentrations.

Authors:  Becky M Hess; Brett G Amidan; Kevin K Anderson; Janine R Hutchison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Considerations for estimating microbial environmental data concentrations collected from a field setting.

Authors:  Erin E Silvestri; Cynthia Yund; Sarah Taft; Charlena Yoder Bowling; Daniel Chappie; Kevin Garrahan; Eletha Brady-Roberts; Harry Stone; Tonya L Nichols
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.563

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.