BACKGROUND: Only a few patients on a GP's list develop cancer each year. To find these cases in the jumble of presented problems is a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To explore how general practitioners (GPs) come to think of cancer in a clinical encounter. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with Norwegian GPs, who were invited to think back on consultations during which the thought of cancer arose. The 11 GPs recounted and reflected on 70 such stories from their practices. A phenomenographic approach enabled the study of variation in GPs' ways of experiencing. RESULTS: Awareness of cancer could arise in several contexts of attention: (1) Practising basic knowledge: explicit rules and skills, such as alarm symptoms, epidemiology and clinical know-how; (2) Interpersonal awareness: being alert to changes in patients' appearance or behaviour and to cues in their choice of words, on a background of basic knowledge and experience; (3) Intuitive knowing: a tacit feeling of alarm which could be difficult to verbalize, but nevertheless was helpful. Intuition built on the earlier mentioned contexts: basic knowledge, experience, and interpersonal awareness; (4) Fear of cancer: the existential context of awareness could affect the thoughts of both doctor and patient. The challenge could be how not to think about cancer all the time and to find ways to live with insecurity without becoming over-precautious. CONCLUSION: The thought of cancer arose in the relationship between doctor and patient. The quality of their interaction and the doctor's accuracy in perceiving and interpreting cues were decisive.
BACKGROUND: Only a few patients on a GP's list develop cancer each year. To find these cases in the jumble of presented problems is a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To explore how general practitioners (GPs) come to think of cancer in a clinical encounter. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with Norwegian GPs, who were invited to think back on consultations during which the thought of cancer arose. The 11 GPs recounted and reflected on 70 such stories from their practices. A phenomenographic approach enabled the study of variation in GPs' ways of experiencing. RESULTS: Awareness of cancer could arise in several contexts of attention: (1) Practising basic knowledge: explicit rules and skills, such as alarm symptoms, epidemiology and clinical know-how; (2) Interpersonal awareness: being alert to changes in patients' appearance or behaviour and to cues in their choice of words, on a background of basic knowledge and experience; (3) Intuitive knowing: a tacit feeling of alarm which could be difficult to verbalize, but nevertheless was helpful. Intuition built on the earlier mentioned contexts: basic knowledge, experience, and interpersonal awareness; (4) Fear of cancer: the existential context of awareness could affect the thoughts of both doctor and patient. The challenge could be how not to think about cancer all the time and to find ways to live with insecurity without becoming over-precautious. CONCLUSION: The thought of cancer arose in the relationship between doctor and patient. The quality of their interaction and the doctor's accuracy in perceiving and interpreting cues were decisive.
Authors: Erik Stolper; Marloes van Bokhoven; Paul Houben; Paul Van Royen; Margje van de Wiel; Trudy van der Weijden; Geert Jan Dinant Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: A J Berendsen; A Groot Nibbelink; R Blaauwbroek; M Y Berger; W J E Tissing Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: C F Stolper; M W J Van de Wiel; R H M Hendriks; P Van Royen; M A Van Bokhoven; T Van der Weijden; G J Dinant Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 3.853
Authors: Christiaan F Stolper; Margje W J Van de Wiel; Henrica C W De Vet; Alexander L B Rutten; Paul Van Royen; Marloes A Van Bokhoven; Trudy Van der Weijden; Geert Jan Dinant Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-01-02 Impact factor: 2.497