Literature DB >> 22745220

Informatics in radiology: improving clinical work flow through an AIM database: a sample web-based lesion tracking application.

Aaron C Abajian1, Mia Levy, Daniel L Rubin.   

Abstract

Quantitative assessments on images are crucial to clinical decision making, especially in cancer patients, in whom measurements of lesions are tracked over time. However, the potential value of quantitative approaches to imaging is impeded by the difficulty and time-intensive nature of compiling this information from prior studies and reporting corresponding information on current studies. The authors believe that the quantitative imaging work flow can be automated by making temporal data computationally accessible. In this article, they demonstrate the utility of the Annotation and Image Markup standard in a World Wide Web-based application that was developed to automatically summarize prior and current quantitative imaging measurements. The system calculates the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors metric, along with several alternative indicators of cancer treatment response, by using the data stored in the annotation files. The application also allows the user to overlay the recorded metrics on the original images for visual inspection. Clinical evaluation of the system demonstrates its potential utility in accelerating the standard radiology work flow and in providing a means to evaluate alternative response metrics that are difficult to compute by hand. The system, which illustrates the utility of capturing quantitative information in a standard format and linking it to the image from which it was derived, could enhance quantitative imaging in clinical practice without adversely affecting the current work flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22745220      PMCID: PMC3439633          DOI: 10.1148/rg.325115752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  24 in total

Review 1.  DICOM reference guide.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Devices       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting.

Authors:  Lawrence H Schwartz; David M Panicek; Alexandra R Berk; Yuelin Li; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  DICOM structured reporting: Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations.

Authors:  Rada Hussein; Uwe Engelmann; Andre Schroeter; Hans-Peter Meinzer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  iPad: Semantic annotation and markup of radiological images.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Cesar Rodriguez; Priyanka Shah; Chris Beaulieu
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

5.  The Annotation and Image Mark-up project.

Authors:  David S Channin; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Informatics in radiology: use of a macro scripting editor to facilitate transfer of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry reports into an existing departmental voice recognition dictation system.

Authors:  Michael Iv; Mahesh R Patel; Adam Santos; Young S Kang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Current and future trends in imaging informatics for oncology.

Authors:  Mia A Levy; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

8.  Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 2, oncologists' opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers.

Authors:  Tracy A Jaffe; Nicholas W Wickersham; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response.

Authors:  Jeremy J Erasmus; Gregory W Gladish; Lyle Broemeling; Bradley S Sabloff; Mylene T Truong; Roy S Herbst; Reginald F Munden
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The caBIG annotation and image Markup project.

Authors:  David S Channin; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; Kastubh Sepukar; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Imaging informatics: essential tools for the delivery of imaging services.

Authors:  David S Mendelson; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Ontology-based image navigation: exploring 3.0-T MR neurography of the brachial plexus using AIM and RadLex.

Authors:  Kenneth C Wang; Aditya R Salunkhe; James J Morrison; Pearlene P Lee; José L V Mejino; Landon T Detwiler; James F Brinkley; Eliot L Siegel; Daniel L Rubin; John A Carrino
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Advancing Semantic Interoperability of Image Annotations: Automated Conversion of Non-standard Image Annotations in a Commercial PACS to the Annotation and Image Markup.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Swinburne; David Mendelson; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Improvement of radiology reporting in a clinical cancer network: impact of an optimised multidisciplinary workflow.

Authors:  A W Olthof; J Borstlap; W W Roeloffzen; P M C Callenbach; P M A van Ooijen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Pitfalls in RECIST Data Extraction for Clinical Trials: Beyond the Basics.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Carrie R McGhee; Nikita Lakomkin; Carlos L Arteaga
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Automated tracking of quantitative assessments of tumor burden in clinical trials.

Authors:  Daniel L Rubin; Debra Willrett; Martin J O'Connor; Cleber Hage; Camille Kurtz; Dilvan A Moreira
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 7.  Methods and challenges in quantitative imaging biomarker development.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Kirsteen R Burton; John-Paul J Yu; Ernest M Scalzetti; Thomas E Yankeelov; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Mishal Mendiratta-Lala; Brian J Bartholmai; Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan; Leon Lenchik; Rathan M Subramaniam
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Resources Required for Semi-Automatic Volumetric Measurements in Metastatic Chordoma: Is Potentially Improved Tumor Burden Assessment Worth the Time Burden?

Authors:  Kathleen E Fenerty; Nicholas J Patronas; Christopher R Heery; James L Gulley; Les R Folio
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory radiogenomic analysis by using quantitative image features.

Authors:  Olivier Gevaert; Lex A Mitchell; Achal S Achrol; Jiajing Xu; Sebastian Echegaray; Gary K Steinberg; Samuel H Cheshier; Sandy Napel; Greg Zaharchuk; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Standard Lexicons, Coding Systems and Ontologies for Interoperability and Semantic Computation in Imaging.

Authors:  Kenneth C Wang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.056

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.