Literature DB >> 21799326

Current and future trends in imaging informatics for oncology.

Mia A Levy1, Daniel L Rubin.   

Abstract

Clinical imaging plays an essential role in cancer care and research for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment response assessment. Major advances in imaging informatics to support medical imaging have been made during the last several decades. More recent informatics advances focus on the special needs of oncologic imaging, yet gaps still remain. We review the current state, limitations, and future trends in imaging informatics for oncology care including clinical and clinical research systems. We review information systems to support cancer clinical workflows including oncologist ordering of radiology studies, radiologist review and reporting of image findings, and oncologist review and integration of imaging information for clinical decision making. We discuss informatics approaches to oncologic imaging including, but not limited to, controlled terminologies, image annotation, and image-processing algorithms. With the ongoing development of novel imaging modalities and imaging biomarkers, we expect these systems will continue to evolve and mature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799326      PMCID: PMC4050062          DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3182272f04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  31 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring.

Authors:  Shanshan Wang; William Pavlicek; Catherine C Roberts; Steve G Langer; Muhong Zhang; Mengqi Hu; Richard L Morin; Beth A Schueler; Clinton V Wellnitz; Teresa Wu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Image Wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection.

Authors:  James A Brink; E Stephen Amis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  A framework for improving radiology reporting.

Authors:  Chris L Sistrom; Curtis P Langlotz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  Picture archiving and communication systems: an overview.

Authors:  R H Choplin; J M Boehme; C D Maynard
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Image Gently(SM): a national education and communication campaign in radiology using the science of social marketing.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Gregory Morrison; Keith J Strauss
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Bruce D Cheson; Beate Pfistner; Malik E Juweid; Randy D Gascoyne; Lena Specht; Sandra J Horning; Bertrand Coiffier; Richard I Fisher; Anton Hagenbeek; Emanuele Zucca; Steven T Rosen; Sigrid Stroobants; T Andrew Lister; Richard T Hoppe; Martin Dreyling; Kensei Tobinai; Julie M Vose; Joseph M Connors; Massimo Federico; Volker Diehl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Quantitative imaging in oncology patients: Part 2, oncologists' opinions and expectations at major U.S. cancer centers.

Authors:  Tracy A Jaffe; Nicholas W Wickersham; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Managing and Querying Image Annotation and Markup in XML.

Authors:  Fusheng Wang; Tony Pan; Ashish Sharma; Joel Saltz
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-01-01

10.  Lessons learned from independent central review.

Authors:  R Ford; L Schwartz; J Dancey; L E Dodd; E A Eisenhauer; S Gwyther; L Rubinstein; D Sargent; L Shankar; P Therasse; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  5 in total

1.  The role of informatics in health care reform.

Authors:  Yueyi I Liu; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Radiomics in RayPlus: a Web-Based Tool for Texture Analysis in Medical Images.

Authors:  Rong Yuan; Shuyue Shi; Junhui Chen; Guanxun Cheng
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Informatics in radiology: improving clinical work flow through an AIM database: a sample web-based lesion tracking application.

Authors:  Aaron C Abajian; Mia Levy; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 4.  Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Elizabeth R Gerstner; James M Mountz; Lawrence H Schwartz; Christopher W Ryan; Michael M Graham; John M Buatti; Fiona M Fennessy; Edward A Eikman; Virendra Kumar; Kenneth M Forster; Richard L Wahl; Frank S Lieberman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Radiologists' leading position in image-guided therapy.

Authors:  Thomas Helmberger; Luis Martí-Bonmatí; Philippe Pereira; Alice Gillams; Jose Martínez; Johannes Lammer; Katarina Malagari; Afshin Gangi; Thierry de Baere; E Jane Adam; Coen Rasch; Volker Budach; Jim A Reekers
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2013-01-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.