Literature DB >> 21246529

Comorbidities and mammography use interact to explain racial/ethnic disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis.

Shagufta Yasmeen1, Guibo Xing, Cyllene Morris, Rowan T Chlebowski, Patrick S Romano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interactions with comorbidity burden and comorbidity-related care have not been examined as potential explanations for racial/ethnic disparities in advanced-stage breast cancer at diagnosis.
METHODS: The authors used linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data to determine whether comorbidity burden and comorbidity-related care are associated with stage at diagnosis, whether these associations are mediated by mammography use, and whether they explain racial/ethnic disparities. Stage at diagnosis and mammography use were analyzed in multivariate regression models, adjusting for comorbidity burden and comorbidity-race interactions among 118,742 women diagnosed with breast cancer during 1993 to 2005.
RESULTS: Mammography utilization was higher among women with ≥ 3 stable comorbidities than among those without comorbidities. Advanced stage at diagnosis was associated with black race (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-1.8), Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.5), unstable comorbidity, and age ≥ 80 years. Mammography was protective in all racial/ethnic groups, but neither mammography use (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.3-0.3 and OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.2-0.2 for women with 1 and ≥ 2 prior mammograms, respectively) nor overall physician service use (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8 for women with ≥ 16 visits) explained the association between race/ethnicity and stage at diagnosis. The black/white OR fell to 1.2 (95% CI, 0.9-1.5) among women with multiple stable comorbidities who received ≥ 2 screening mammograms, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) among mammography users with unstable comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity burden was associated with regular mammography and earlier stage at diagnosis. Racial/ethnic disparities in late stage disease were reduced among women who received both regular mammograms and comorbidity-related care.
Copyright © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21246529     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  34 in total

1.  The SUCCEED Legacy Grant program: enhancing community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in breast and cervical cancer.

Authors:  John Harvey Wingfield; Tabia Henry Akintobi; DeBran Jacobs; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

2.  Breast cancer characteristics and outcomes among Hispanic Black and Hispanic White women.

Authors:  Matthew P Banegas; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Diabetes and differences in detection of incident invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Gregory S Calip; Onchee Yu; Denise M Boudreau; Huibo Shao; Ruth Oratz; Stephen B Richardson; Heather T Gold
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Breast cancer screening, area deprivation, and later-stage breast cancer in Appalachia: does geography matter?

Authors:  Roger T Anderson; Tse-Chang Yang; Stephen A Matthews; Fabian Camacho; Teresa Kern; Heath B Mackley; Gretchen Kimmick; Christopher Louis; Eugene Lengerich; Nengliang Yao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Risk of advanced-stage breast cancer among older women with comorbidities.

Authors:  Shagufta Yasmeen; Rebecca A Hubbard; Patrick S Romano; Weiwei Zhu; Berta M Geller; Tracy Onega; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Racial disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment by hormone receptor and HER2 status.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates?

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Weiwei Zhu; Rebecca A Hubbard; Ellen S O'Meara; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta Geller; Kim Dittus; Dan Moore; Karen J Wernli; Jeanne Mandelblatt; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Short-term outcomes of screening mammography using computer-aided detection: a population-based study of medicare enrollees.

Authors:  Joshua J Fenton; Guibo Xing; Joann G Elmore; Heejung Bang; Steven L Chen; Karen K Lindfors; Laura-Mae Baldwin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Yingye Zheng; Virginia P Quinn; Elisabeth F Beaber; Carolyn M Rutter; Ethan A Halm; Jessica Chubak; Chyke A Doubeni; Jennifer S Haas; Aruna Kamineni; Marilyn M Schapira; Pamela M Vacek; Michael P Garcia; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 10.  Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Cervical and Breast Cancer Literacy of African Americans, Latina, and Arab Women.

Authors:  Costellia H Talley; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.