Literature DB >> 22733650

Extending the c-statistic to nominal polytomous outcomes: the Polytomous Discrimination Index.

Ben Van Calster1, Vanya Van Belle, Yvonne Vergouwe, Dirk Timmerman, Sabine Van Huffel, Ewout W Steyerberg.   

Abstract

Diagnostic problems in medicine are sometimes polytomous, meaning that the outcome has more than two distinct categories. For example, ovarian tumors can be benign, borderline, primary invasive, or metastatic. Extending the main measure of binary discrimination, the c-statistic or area under the ROC curve, to nominal polytomous settings is not straightforward. This paper reviews existing measures and presents the polytomous discrimination index (PDI) as an alternative. The PDI assesses all sets of k cases consisting of one case from each outcome category. For each category i (i = 1, … ,k), it is assessed whether the risk of category i is highest for the case from category i. A score of 1∕k is given per category for which this holds, yielding a set score between 0 and 1 to indicate the level of discrimination. The PDI is the average set score and is interpreted as the probability to correctly identify a case from a randomly selected category within a set of k cases. This probability can be split up by outcome category, yielding k category-specific values that result in the PDI when averaged. We demonstrate the measures on two diagnostic problems (residual mass histology after chemotherapy for testicular cancer; diagnosis of ovarian tumors). We compare the behavior of the measures on theoretical data, showing that PDI is more strongly influenced by simultaneous discrimination between all categories than by partial discrimination between pairs of categories. In conclusion, the PDI is attractive because it better matches the requirements of a measure to summarize polytomous discrimination.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22733650     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  25 in total

1.  Radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced CT for classification of hepatic focal lesions in colorectal cancer patients: its limitations compared to radiologists.

Authors:  Heejin Bae; Hansang Lee; Sungwon Kim; Kyunghwa Han; Hyungjin Rhee; Dong-Kyu Kim; Hyuk Kwon; Helen Hong; Joon Seok Lim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The clinical performance of the M4 decision support model to triage women with a pregnancy of unknown location as at low or high risk of complications.

Authors:  S Bobdiwala; S Guha; B Van Calster; F Ayim; N Mitchell-Jones; M Al-Memar; H Mitchell; C Stalder; C Bottomley; A Kothari; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Yvonne Vergouwe; Caspar W N Looman; Vanya Van Belle; Dirk Timmerman; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  AR(1) latent class models for longitudinal count data.

Authors:  Nicholas C Henderson; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 5.  Charting a roadmap for heart failure biomarker studies.

Authors:  Tariq Ahmad; Mona Fiuzat; Michael J Pencina; Nancy L Geller; Faiez Zannad; John G F Cleland; James V Snider; Stephan Blankenberg; Kirkwood F Adams; Rita F Redberg; Jae B Kim; Alice Mascette; Robert J Mentz; Christopher M O'Connor; G Michael Felker; James L Januzzi
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 12.035

6.  Assessing the performance of clinical diagnostic models for dehydration among patients with cholera and undernutrition in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Monique Gainey; Kexin Qu; Stephanie C Garbern; Meagan A Barry; John Austin Lee; Sabiha Nasrin; Mahmuda Monjory; Eric J Nelson; Rochelle Rosen; Nur H Alam; Christopher H Schmid; Adam C Levine
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.918

7.  The polytomous discrimination index for prediction involving multistate processes under intermittent observation.

Authors:  Shu Jiang; Richard J Cook
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Validation of the Feverkidstool and procalcitonin for detecting serious bacterial infections in febrile children.

Authors:  Ruud G Nijman; Yvonne Vergouwe; Henriëtte A Moll; Frank J Smit; Floor Weerkamp; Ewout W Steyerberg; Johan van der Lei; Yolanda B de Rijke; Rianne Oostenbrink
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.756

9.  Development of Classification Criteria for the Uveitides.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.488

10.  Risk prediction models for discrete ordinal outcomes: Calibration and the impact of the proportional odds assumption.

Authors:  Michael Edlinger; Maarten van Smeden; Hannes F Alber; Maria Wanitschek; Ben Van Calster
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.