Literature DB >> 35596238

The polytomous discrimination index for prediction involving multistate processes under intermittent observation.

Shu Jiang1, Richard J Cook2.   

Abstract

With the increasing importance of predictive modeling in health research comes the need for methods to rigorously assess predictive accuracy. We consider the problem of evaluating the accuracy of predictive models for nominal outcomes when outcome data are coarsened at random. We first consider the problem in the context of a multinomial response modeled by polytomous logistic regression. Attention is then directed to the motivating setting in which class membership corresponds to the state occupied in a multistate disease process at a time horizon of interest. Here, class (state) membership may be unknown at the time horizon since disease processes are under intermittent observation. We propose a novel extension to the polytomous discrimination index to address this and evaluate the predictive accuracy of an intensity-based model in the context of a study involving patients with arthritis from a registry at the University of Toronto Centre for Prognosis Studies in Rheumatic Diseases.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  classification; coarsening; discrimination; intermittent observation; multistate processes; predictive model; risk scores

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35596238      PMCID: PMC9308735          DOI: 10.1002/sim.9441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.497


  19 in total

1.  Comparing three-class diagnostic tests by three-way ROC analysis.

Authors:  S Dreiseitl; L Ohno-Machado; M Binder
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Predictive accuracy and explained variation.

Authors:  Michael Schemper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Handling drop-out in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Joseph W Hogan; Jason Roy; Christina Korkontzelou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests.

Authors:  F E Harrell; R M Califf; D B Pryor; K L Lee; R A Rosati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A multi-state model for evolution of intensive care unit patients: prediction of nosocomial infections and deaths.

Authors:  S Escolano; J L Golmard; A M Korinek; A Mallet
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Estimation and prediction in a multi-state model for breast cancer.

Authors:  Hein Putter; Jos van der Hage; Geertruida H de Bock; Rachid Elgalta; Cornelis J H van de Velde
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  The validity of the New York radiological grading criteria in diagnosing sacroiliitis by computed tomography.

Authors:  M Geijer; G Gadeholt Göthlin; J H Göthlin
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Contrasting DCIS and invasive breast cancer by subtype suggests basal-like DCIS as distinct lesions.

Authors:  Helga Bergholtz; Tonje G Lien; David M Swanson; Arnoldo Frigessi; Maria Grazia Daidone; Jörg Tost; Fredrik Wärnberg; Therese Sørlie
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.