Literature DB >> 22730412

Clustering methods applied in the detection of Ki67 hot-spots in whole tumor slide images: an efficient way to characterize heterogeneous tissue-based biomarkers.

Xavier Moles Lopez1, Olivier Debeir, Calliope Maris, Sandrine Rorive, Isabelle Roland, Marco Saerens, Isabelle Salmon, Christine Decaestecker.   

Abstract

Whole-slide scanners allow the digitization of an entire histological slide at very high resolution. This new acquisition technique opens a wide range of possibilities for addressing challenging image analysis problems, including the identification of tissue-based biomarkers. In this study, we use whole-slide scanner technology for imaging the proliferating activity patterns in tumor slides based on Ki67 immunohistochemistry. Faced with large images, pathologists require tools that can help them identify tumor regions that exhibit high proliferating activity, called "hot-spots" (HSs). Pathologists need tools that can quantitatively characterize these HS patterns. To respond to this clinical need, the present study investigates various clustering methods with the aim of identifying Ki67 HSs in whole tumor slide images. This task requires a method capable of identifying an unknown number of clusters, which may be highly variable in terms of shape, size, and density. We developed a hybrid clustering method, referred to as Seedlink. Compared to manual HS selections by three pathologists, we show that Seedlink provides an efficient way of detecting Ki67 HSs and improves the agreement among pathologists when identifying HSs.
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22730412     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  11 in total

Review 1.  Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays.

Authors:  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Kari Alitalo; Elizabeth Allen; Andrey Anisimov; Alfred C Aplin; Robert Auerbach; Hellmut G Augustin; David O Bates; Judy R van Beijnum; R Hugh F Bender; Gabriele Bergers; Andreas Bikfalvi; Joyce Bischoff; Barbara C Böck; Peter C Brooks; Federico Bussolino; Bertan Cakir; Peter Carmeliet; Daniel Castranova; Anca M Cimpean; Ondine Cleaver; George Coukos; George E Davis; Michele De Palma; Anna Dimberg; Ruud P M Dings; Valentin Djonov; Andrew C Dudley; Neil P Dufton; Sarah-Maria Fendt; Napoleone Ferrara; Marcus Fruttiger; Dai Fukumura; Bart Ghesquière; Yan Gong; Robert J Griffin; Adrian L Harris; Christopher C W Hughes; Nan W Hultgren; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe; Melita Irving; Rakesh K Jain; Raghu Kalluri; Joanna Kalucka; Robert S Kerbel; Jan Kitajewski; Ingeborg Klaassen; Hynda K Kleinmann; Pieter Koolwijk; Elisabeth Kuczynski; Brenda R Kwak; Koen Marien; Juan M Melero-Martin; Lance L Munn; Roberto F Nicosia; Agnes Noel; Jussi Nurro; Anna-Karin Olsson; Tatiana V Petrova; Kristian Pietras; Roberto Pili; Jeffrey W Pollard; Mark J Post; Paul H A Quax; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Marius Raica; Anna M Randi; Domenico Ribatti; Curzio Ruegg; Reinier O Schlingemann; Stefan Schulte-Merker; Lois E H Smith; Jonathan W Song; Steven A Stacker; Jimmy Stalin; Amber N Stratman; Maureen Van de Velde; Victor W M van Hinsbergh; Peter B Vermeulen; Johannes Waltenberger; Brant M Weinstein; Hong Xin; Bahar Yetkin-Arik; Seppo Yla-Herttuala; Mervin C Yoder; Arjan W Griffioen
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 9.596

2.  New insights into cell cycle and DNA damage response machineries through high-resolution AMICO quantitative imaging cytometry.

Authors:  A Tarnok; Z Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 6.831

3.  Tumor-Penetrating Nanoparticles for Enhanced Anticancer Activity of Combined Photodynamic and Hypoxia-Activated Therapy.

Authors:  Yazhe Wang; Ying Xie; Jing Li; Zheng-Hong Peng; Yuri Sheinin; Jianping Zhou; David Oupický
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Continuous representation of tumor microvessel density and detection of angiogenic hotspots in histological whole-slide images.

Authors:  Jakob Nikolas Kather; Alexander Marx; Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro; Lothar R Schad; Frank Gerrit Zöllner; Cleo-Aron Weis
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-08-07

5.  Automated Selection of Hotspots (ASH): enhanced automated segmentation and adaptive step finding for Ki67 hotspot detection in adrenal cortical cancer.

Authors:  Hao Lu; Thomas G Papathomas; David van Zessen; Ivo Palli; Ronald R de Krijger; Peter J van der Spek; Winand N M Dinjens; Andrew P Stubbs
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.644

6.  Adaptive localization of focus point regions via random patch probabilistic density from whole-slide, Ki-67-stained brain tumor tissue.

Authors:  Yazan M Alomari; Siti Norul Huda Sheikh Abdullah; Reena Rahayu MdZin; Khairuddin Omar
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Evaluation of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in gliomas: Interobserver variability and digital quantification.

Authors:  Ljudmilla A G Nielsen; Julie A Bangsø; Kim H Lindahl; Rikke H Dahlrot; Jacob V B Hjelmborg; Steinbjørn Hansen; Bjarne W Kristensen
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.644

8.  A Machine Learning Approach for the Association of ki-67 Scoring with Prognostic Factors.

Authors:  E Dirican; E Kiliç
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Automated quantification of proliferation with automated hot-spot selection in phosphohistone H3/MART1 dual-stained stage I/II melanoma.

Authors:  Patricia Switten Nielsen; Rikke Riber-Hansen; Henrik Schmidt; Torben Steiniche
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Identifying tumor in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from Ki67 images using transfer learning.

Authors:  Muhammad Khalid Khan Niazi; Thomas Erol Tavolara; Vidya Arole; Douglas J Hartman; Liron Pantanowitz; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.