J Rothaug1, T Weiss, W Meissner. 1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Deutschland. judith.rothaug@med.uni-jena.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measurement of functional interference (FI) of pain is crucial for postoperative pain management. This study examined the external validity of three FI items (respiration, mobilization and sleep) within the framework of the German quality improvement in postoperative pain management (QUIPS) project. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 380 patients undergoing trauma/orthopedic or abdominal surgery were asked to complete the QUIPS outcome questionnaire. Criteria to determine external validity of FI assessment were tolerance to a continuous passive motion (CPM) machine for FI with mobilization, the pre-postoperative difference of peak flow for FI with respiration and sleep quality measured with actigraphy for FI with sleep. RESULTS: The QUIPS outcome questionnaire achieved satisfactory reliability (r(tt) =0 .783-0.954, internal consistency 0.597-0.941). The three FI items under examination achieved a significant correlation (r =0 .407-0.469) with the external criteria.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of functional interference (FI) of pain is crucial for postoperative pain management. This study examined the external validity of three FI items (respiration, mobilization and sleep) within the framework of the German quality improvement in postoperative pain management (QUIPS) project. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 380 patients undergoing trauma/orthopedic or abdominal surgery were asked to complete the QUIPS outcome questionnaire. Criteria to determine external validity of FI assessment were tolerance to a continuous passive motion (CPM) machine for FI with mobilization, the pre-postoperative difference of peak flow for FI with respiration and sleep quality measured with actigraphy for FI with sleep. RESULTS: The QUIPS outcome questionnaire achieved satisfactory reliability (r(tt) =0 .783-0.954, internal consistency 0.597-0.941). The three FI items under examination achieved a significant correlation (r =0 .407-0.469) with the external criteria.
Authors: Martin McCarthy; Olga Jonasson; Chih-Hung Chang; A Simon Pickard; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; James Gibbs; Perry Edelman; Robert Fitzgibbons; Leigh Neumayer Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: San Keller; Carla M Bann; Sheri L Dodd; Jeff Schein; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Florian Brunner; Carolin Heitz; Rudolf Kissling; Alfons G H Kessels; Roberto S G M Perez; Johan Marinus; Gerben ter Riet; Lucas M Bachmann Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Dan Benhamou; Marco Berti; Gerhard Brodner; Jose De Andres; Gaetano Draisci; Mariano Moreno-Azcoita; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Wolfgang Schwenk; Luis Miguel Torres; Eric Viel Journal: Pain Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Winfried Meißner; Marcus Komann; Joachim Erlenwein; Ulrike Stamer; André Scherag Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: A Linzbach; D Nitschke; J Rothaug; M Komann; C Weinmann; E Schleußner; W Meißner; J Jimenez Cruz; U Schneider Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Achim Benditz; Felix Greimel; Patrick Auer; Florian Zeman; Antje Göttermann; Joachim Grifka; Winfried Meissner; Frederik von Kunow Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Marcus Komann; Alexander Avian; Johannes Dreiling; Hans Gerbershagen; Thomas Volk; Claudia Weinmann; Winfried Meißner Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 4.241