Literature DB >> 12454804

A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: recommendations for standardized outcome measures.

Debra B Gordon1, Teresa A Pellino, Christine Miaskowski, Jeanette Adams McNeill, Judith A Paice, Daniel Laferriere, Marilyn Bookbinder.   

Abstract

Quality measurement in health care is complex and in a constant state of evolution. Different approaches are necessary depending on the purpose of the measurement (e.g., accountability, research, improvement). Recent changes in health care accreditation standards are driving increased attention to measurement of the quality of pain management for improvement purposes. The purpose of this article is to determine what indicators are being used for pain quality improvement, compare results across studies, and provide specific recommendations to simplify and standardize future measurement of quality for hospital-based pain management initiatives. Pain management quality improvement monitoring experience and data from 1992 to 2001 were analyzed from 20 studies performed at eight large hospitals in the United States. Hospitals included: the University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison; Texas Medical Center, Houston; McAllen Medical Center, McAllen, TX; San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center and Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; and Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center of Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Clackamas, OR. Analyses of data led to consensus on six quality indicators for hospital-based pain management. These indicators include: the intensity of pain is documented with a numeric or descriptive rating scale; pain intensity is documented at frequent intervals; pain is treated by a route other than intramuscular; pain is treated with regularly administered analgesics, and when possible, a multimodal approach is used; pain is prevented and controlled to a degree that facilitates function and quality of life; and patients are adequately informed and knowledgeable about pain management. Although there are no perfect measures of quality, longitudinal data support the validity of a core set of indicators that could be used to obtain benchmark data for quality improvement in pain management in the hospital setting. Copyright 2002 by the American Society of Pain Management Nurses

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12454804     DOI: 10.1053/jpmn.2002.127570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs        ISSN: 1524-9042            Impact factor:   1.929


  32 in total

1.  [External validity of pain-linked functional interference: are we measuring what we want to measure?].

Authors:  J Rothaug; T Weiss; W Meissner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Perceived pain and satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after hospital discharge.

Authors:  Ivonne-Marie Bergés; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Pamela M Smith; David Smith; Genn V Ostir
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.477

3.  Improving assessment of postoperative pain in surgical wards by education and training.

Authors:  R Karlsten; K Ström; L Gunningberg
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-10

4.  A randomized trial of a representational intervention to decrease cancer pain (RIDcancerPain).

Authors:  Sandra Ward; Heidi Donovan; Sigridur Gunnarsdottir; Ronald C Serlin; Gary R Shapiro; Susan Hughes
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  A randomized trial of a representational intervention for cancer pain: does targeting the dyad make a difference?

Authors:  Sandra E Ward; Ronald C Serlin; Heidi S Donovan; Suzanne W Ameringer; Susan Hughes; Klaren Pe-Romashko; Ko-Kung Wang
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Quality improvement in postoperative pain management: results from the QUIPS project.

Authors:  Winfried Meissner; Swantje Mescha; Judith Rothaug; Sibylle Zwacka; Antje Goettermann; Kristin Ulrich; Alexander Schleppers
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Light-Emitting Diode Phototherapy Reduces Nocifensive Behavior Induced by Thermal and Chemical Noxious Stimuli in Mice: Evidence for the Involvement of Capsaicin-Sensitive Central Afferent Fibers.

Authors:  Glauce Regina Pigatto; Igor Santos Coelho; Rosane Schenkel Aquino; Liliane Freitas Bauermann; Adair Roberto Soares Santos
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  Can Multidimensional Pain Assessment Tools Help Improve Pain Outcomes in the Perianesthesia Setting?

Authors:  Emily Petti; Clara Scher; Lauren Meador; Janet H Van Cleave; M Carrington Reid
Journal:  J Perianesth Nurs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.084

9.  Improving the management of pain in hospitalized adults.

Authors:  R Sean Morrison; Diane E Meier; Daniel Fischberg; Carlton Moore; Howard Degenholtz; Ann Litke; Catherine Maroney-Galin; Albert L Siu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-08

10.  Pain intensity assessment by bedside nurses and palliative care consultants: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Eduardo Bruera; Jie S Willey; Patricia A Ewert-Flannagan; Mary K Cline; Guddi Kaur; Loren Shen; Tao Zhang; J Lynn Palmer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.