Winfried Meißner1, Marcus Komann, Joachim Erlenwein, Ulrike Stamer, André Scherag. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital; Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Göttingen; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Research, University of Bern; Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many patients in German hospitals complain of inadequate treatment of their postoperative pain. Hospital-related structural and procedural variables may affect pain perception and patient satisfaction. We studied the association of individual variables with outcome quality. METHODS: Data from the years 2011 to 2014 from the world's largest acute pain registry (QUIPS) were evaluated. The analysis was performed with mixed linear regression models. RESULTS: We studied registry data from 138 German hospitals concerning four commonly performed types of operations (total number of operations, 21 114) and found that the intensity of pain, functional impairment, and satisfaction with postoperative pain therapy were all highly variable from one hospital to another. Patients in university hospitals complained more often than those in standard care facilities of highly intense pain (odds ratio [OR] 2.44; 95% con - fidence interval [CI] [1.18; 5.04]) and dissatisfaction (OR 3.58 [1.85; 6.93]). In specialized centers as well, pain intensity (OR 1.39 [1.06; 1.83]) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.59 [1.25; 2.02]) were higher. Pain-related limitation of movement was also reported more commonly in university hospitals (OR 2.12 [0.87; 5.16]) and specialized centers (OR 1.87 [1.33; 2.65]) than in standard care facilities. Less pain-related limitation of movement and higher satisfaction were reported in hospitals in which pain was documented in the patients' charts and the patients felt adequately informed about the treatment options. CONCLUSION: The current state of postoperative pain therapy leaves much room for improvement. Quality indicators in the field of acute pain medicine might help improve patient care.
BACKGROUND: Many patients in German hospitals complain of inadequate treatment of their postoperative pain. Hospital-related structural and procedural variables may affect pain perception and patient satisfaction. We studied the association of individual variables with outcome quality. METHODS: Data from the years 2011 to 2014 from the world's largest acute pain registry (QUIPS) were evaluated. The analysis was performed with mixed linear regression models. RESULTS: We studied registry data from 138 German hospitals concerning four commonly performed types of operations (total number of operations, 21 114) and found that the intensity of pain, functional impairment, and satisfaction with postoperative pain therapy were all highly variable from one hospital to another. Patients in university hospitals complained more often than those in standard care facilities of highly intense pain (odds ratio [OR] 2.44; 95% con - fidence interval [CI] [1.18; 5.04]) and dissatisfaction (OR 3.58 [1.85; 6.93]). In specialized centers as well, pain intensity (OR 1.39 [1.06; 1.83]) and dissatisfaction (OR 1.59 [1.25; 2.02]) were higher. Pain-related limitation of movement was also reported more commonly in university hospitals (OR 2.12 [0.87; 5.16]) and specialized centers (OR 1.87 [1.33; 2.65]) than in standard care facilities. Less pain-related limitation of movement and higher satisfaction were reported in hospitals in which pain was documented in the patients' charts and the patients felt adequately informed about the treatment options. CONCLUSION: The current state of postoperative pain therapy leaves much room for improvement. Quality indicators in the field of acute pain medicine might help improve patient care.
Authors: J Erlenwein; R Koschwitz; D Pauli-Magnus; M Quintel; W Meißner; F Petzke; U M Stamer Journal: Eur J Pain Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 3.931
Authors: Christoph Maier; Nadja Nestler; Helmut Richter; Winfried Hardinghaus; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn; Michael Zenz; Jürgen Osterbrink Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2010-09-10 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Hans J Gerbershagen; Sanjay Aduckathil; Albert J M van Wijck; Linda M Peelen; Cor J Kalkman; Winfried Meissner Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Joachim Erlenwein; Christopher Bertemes; Steffen Kunsch; Antje Göttermann; Marcus Komann; Lars Sturm; Frank Petzke; Winfried Meißner Journal: Schmerz Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 1.107
Authors: Marcus Komann; Alexander Avian; Johannes Dreiling; Hans Gerbershagen; Thomas Volk; Claudia Weinmann; Winfried Meißner Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 4.241