Literature DB >> 22729750

Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection.

Lauren E Nicolaisen1, Michael M Desai.   

Abstract

Purifying selection can substantially alter patterns of molecular evolution. Its main effect is to reduce overall levels of genetic variation, leading to a reduced effective population size. However, it also distorts genealogies relative to neutral expectations. A structured coalescent method has been used to describe this effect, and forms the basis for numerical methods and simulations. In this study, we extend this approach by making the additional approximation that lineages may be treated independently, which is valid only in the strong selection regime. We show that in this regime, the distortions due to purifying selection can be described by a time-dependent effective population size and mutation rate, confirming earlier intuition. We calculate simple analytical expressions for these functions, N(e)(t) and U(e)(t). These results allow us to describe the structure of genealogies in a population under strong purifying selection as equivalent to a purely neutral population with varying population size and mutation rate, thereby enabling the use of neutral methods of inference and estimation for populations in the strong selection regime.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729750     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  11 in total

1.  The Effects of Background and Interference Selection on Patterns of Genetic Variation in Subdivided Populations.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Pádraic Corcoran
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Coalescence with Background and Balancing Selection in Systems with Bi- and Uniparental Reproduction: Contrasting Partial Asexuality and Selfing.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Matthew Hartfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Distortions in genealogies due to purifying selection and recombination.

Authors:  Lauren E Nicolaisen; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The Effect of Strong Purifying Selection on Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Ivana Cvijović; Benjamin H Good; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  A case for the ancient origin of coronaviruses.

Authors:  Joel O Wertheim; Daniel K W Chu; Joseph S M Peiris; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Leo L M Poon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Phylogeography and molecular epidemiology of an epidemic strain of dengue virus type 1 in Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Karen E Ocwieja; Anira N Fernando; Scott Sherrill-Mix; Sesh A Sundararaman; Rashika N Tennekoon; Rashmi Tippalagama; Shivankari Krishnananthasivam; Gayani Premawansa; Sunil Premawansa; Aruna Dharshan De Silva
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Genetic diversity in the interference selection limit.

Authors:  Benjamin H Good; Aleksandra M Walczak; Richard A Neher; Michael M Desai
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Coupling adaptive molecular evolution to phylodynamics using fitness-dependent birth-death models.

Authors:  David A Rasmussen; Tanja Stadler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Comparative Population Genetics in the Human Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  William R Shoemaker; Daisy Chen; Nandita R Garud
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.