Literature DB >> 22729440

Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers and spectral domain OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Vanessa G Vidotti1, Vital P Costa, Fabrício R Silva, Graziela M Resende, Fernanda Cremasco, Marcelo Dias, Edson S Gomi.   

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the sensitivity and specificity of machine learning classifiers (MLC) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Methods. Sixty-two patients with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field damage and 48 healthy individuals were included. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, achromatic standard automated perimetry, and RNFL imaging with SD-OCT (Cirrus HD-OCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, USA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were obtained for all SD-OCT parameters. Subsequently, the following MLCs were tested: Classification Tree (CTREE), Random Forest (RAN), Bagging (BAG), AdaBoost M1 (ADA), Ensemble Selection (ENS), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Radial Basis Function (RBF), Naive-Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Areas under the ROC curves (aROCs) obtained for each parameter and each MLC were compared. Results. The mean age was 57.0±9.2 years for healthy individuals and 59.9±9.0 years for glaucoma patients (p=0.103). Mean deviation values were -4.1±2.4 dB for glaucoma patients and -1.5±1.6 dB for healthy individuals (p<0.001). The SD-OCT parameters with the greater aROCs were inferior quadrant (0.813), average thickness (0.807), 7 o'clock position (0.765), and 6 o'clock position (0.754). The aROCs from classifiers varied from 0.785 (ADA) to 0.818 (BAG). The aROC obtained with BAG was not significantly different from the aROC obtained with the best single SD-OCT parameter (p=0.93). Conclusions. The SD-OCT showed good diagnostic accuracy in a group of patients with early glaucoma. In this series, MLCs did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22729440     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  6 in total

1.  Machine Learning Models for Diagnosing Glaucoma from Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Maps.

Authors:  Peiyu Wang; Jian Shen; Ryuna Chang; Maemae Moloney; Mina Torres; Bruce Burkemper; Xuejuan Jiang; Damien Rodger; Rohit Varma; Grace M Richter
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2019-08-23

2.  Effects of misalignments in the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Kleyton A Barella; Fernanda Cremasco; Camila Zangalli; Vital P Costa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Automated algorithms combining structure and function outperform general ophthalmologists in diagnosing glaucoma.

Authors:  Leonardo Seidi Shigueoka; José Paulo Cabral de Vasconcellos; Rui Barroso Schimiti; Alexandre Soares Castro Reis; Gabriel Ozeas de Oliveira; Edson Satoshi Gomi; Jayme Augusto Rocha Vianna; Renato Dichetti Dos Reis Lisboa; Felipe Andrade Medeiros; Vital Paulino Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Artificial Intelligence and Ophthalmology

Authors:  Kadircan Keskinbora; Fatih Güven
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 5.  Optical Coherence Tomography and Glaucoma.

Authors:  Alexi Geevarghese; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 7.745

6.  Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT.

Authors:  Kleyton Arlindo Barella; Vital Paulino Costa; Vanessa Gonçalves Vidotti; Fabrício Reis Silva; Marcelo Dias; Edson Satoshi Gomi
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.