Literature DB >> 22720123

Informed consent for digestive endoscopy.

Marcela Kopacova1, Jan Bures.   

Abstract

Informed consent is necessary in good clinical practice. It is based on the patient´s ability to understand the information about the proposed procedure, the potential consequences and complications, and alternative options. The information is written in understandable language and is fortified by verbal discussion between physician and patient. The aim is to explain the problem, answer all questions and to ensure that the patient understands the problems and is able to make a decision. The theory is clear but what happens in daily practice?

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy; Informed consent; Uninformed consent; Written consent

Year:  2012        PMID: 22720123      PMCID: PMC3377864          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v4.i6.227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  19 in total

1.  [Assessment of the quality and psychological impact of information delivered using official consent forms in digestive endoscopy].

Authors:  Isabelle Roque; Patrick Hochain; Véronique Merle; Eric Lerebours; Philippe Hecketsweiler; Philippe Ducrotté
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2003-01

2.  Informed consent for medical procedures: local and national practices.

Authors:  Constantine A Manthous; Angela DeGirolamo; Christopher Haddad; Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Recommendations of the ESGE workshop on Informed Consent for Digestive Endoscopy. First European Symposium on Ethics in Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Kos, Greece, June 2003.

Authors:  C Stanciu; B Novis; S Ladas; A Sommerville; P Zabovowski; P Isaacs; G Papatheodoridis; T James
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  [Informed consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy. A patient-opinion survey].

Authors:  Bernard Denis; Jacques Bottlaender; Jacques Goineau; André Peter; Anne-Marie Weiss
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2002 Aug-Sep

5.  Patient's opinion about written information before laparoscopy: a consecutive series of 100 cases.

Authors:  E Wijtenburg; B Navez; E Cambier; P Guiot
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.090

6.  Are patients informed when they consent to ERCP?

Authors:  Sinead O'Sullivan; Craig Crippen; Terry Ponich
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Dissatisfaction with consent for diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  A Bassi; E Brown; N Kapoor; K Bodger
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.404

8.  What information should be given to patients undergoing therapeutic endoscopy?

Authors:  Peter E T Isaacs
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.404

9.  Cognitive function in patients undergoing arthroplasty: the implications for informed consent.

Authors:  N Demosthenous; J P St Mart; P Jenkins; A Chappel; Kenneth Cheng
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-06-20

10.  Acceptance and understanding of the informed consent procedure prior to gastrointestinal endoscopy by patients: a single-center experience in Korea.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Song; Hwan Sik Yoon; Byung Hoon Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Young Ho Kim; Dong Kyung Chang; Hee Jung Son; Poong Lyul Rhee; Jong Chul Rhee; Jae J Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.165

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effective communication enhances the patients' endoscopy experience.

Authors:  D P Toomey; M Hackett-Brennan; G Corrigan; C Singh; G Nessim; P Balfe
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 1.568

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.