AIM: To test the impact of information brochures and informed consent forms in patients undergoing digestive endoscopy procedures. METHOD: All patients undergoing digestive endoscopy procedures during a two-month period were given information about the procedure to be performed by delivery of an information form produced by the French Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Societies. The patients were then asked to sign an inform consent form. A questionnaire about the informed consent form and the consent experience was given to all patients after the endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 108 consecutive patients. The informed consent form was completely read by 96.3% and understood by 95%. Sixteen percent asked for complementary information, all about complications. Twenty percent were distressed by the explanations. Receiving written information was surprising for 22.2% of the patients, and distressing for 18.5% mainly when endoscopy was planned without general anesthesia (P=0.01 versus general anesthesia). Obtaining informed consent was qualified as a normal procedure for 47.2%, but distressing for 19.4%. It was considered by 41.1% as a way for doctors to be discharged from their obligations. CONCLUSION: The informed consent forms written by scientific societies are easy to understand. One third of the patients were distressed or surprised to be given oral or written information. To sign a written consent form before an endoscopy procedure is considered to be a means of discharging practitioners from their responsibilities for 30% of the patients.
AIM: To test the impact of information brochures and informed consent forms in patients undergoing digestive endoscopy procedures. METHOD: All patients undergoing digestive endoscopy procedures during a two-month period were given information about the procedure to be performed by delivery of an information form produced by the French Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Societies. The patients were then asked to sign an inform consent form. A questionnaire about the informed consent form and the consent experience was given to all patients after the endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 108 consecutive patients. The informed consent form was completely read by 96.3% and understood by 95%. Sixteen percent asked for complementary information, all about complications. Twenty percent were distressed by the explanations. Receiving written information was surprising for 22.2% of the patients, and distressing for 18.5% mainly when endoscopy was planned without general anesthesia (P=0.01 versus general anesthesia). Obtaining informed consent was qualified as a normal procedure for 47.2%, but distressing for 19.4%. It was considered by 41.1% as a way for doctors to be discharged from their obligations. CONCLUSION: The informed consent forms written by scientific societies are easy to understand. One third of the patients were distressed or surprised to be given oral or written information. To sign a written consent form before an endoscopy procedure is considered to be a means of discharging practitioners from their responsibilities for 30% of the patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
Authors: David I Fudman; Konstantinos Papamichael; Lilach Roemi; Varun Rao; Kenneth R Falchuk; Daniel A Leffler; Joseph D Feuerstein Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.062