BACKGROUND: No studies have assessed whether clinicians obtain informed consent for invasive medical procedures, and there are no explicit national standards to guide the process. HYPOTHESIS: Informed consent practices are inconsistent for commonly performed invasive medical procedures. METHODS: A simple questionnaire was electronically mailed and/or faxed to training program directors of critical care medicine and internal medicine departments, and to ICU directors in the state of Connecticut. The questionnaire listed common invasive medical procedures and asked the respondents to check those for which practitioners routinely obtain informed consent in their hospital. RESULTS: The three samples, national intensivists (88 respondents), Connecticut intensivists (29 respondents), and national internists (56 respondents) demonstrated heterogeneity of consenting practices. The rate of obtaining consent for common vascular access procedures ranged from 20 to 90%. The rates of obtaining consent for Foley catheterization and nasogastric intubation were uniformly < 10%, and those for endoscopic procedures were > 90%. Separate consent (beyond the general consent to treat) was not uniformly obtained for the transfusion of blood products (range, 74 to 93%) and common diagnostic medical procedures (eg, thoracentesis, paracentesis, or lumbar puncture; range, 77 to 96%). Surgical intensivists reported that the obtaining of consent for invasive procedures was less routine compared to medical intensivists. Lower rates of consent were noted by those respondents who used a "blanket" consent form, which was signed at the time of hospital admission, to cover subsequent procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In this relatively small sample, there was no uniform practice of informed consent for commonly performed invasive medical procedures. Consent was routinely obtained for GI endoscopy, bronchoscopy, and medical research, and was not obtained for Foley catheterization and nasogastric intubation. The obtaining of consent for vascular cannulation and diagnostic procedures was not routine in the ICUs of a substantial number of respondents. Explicit standards that delineate specifically which procedures require consent may be required to assure more uniform practices.
BACKGROUND: No studies have assessed whether clinicians obtain informed consent for invasive medical procedures, and there are no explicit national standards to guide the process. HYPOTHESIS: Informed consent practices are inconsistent for commonly performed invasive medical procedures. METHODS: A simple questionnaire was electronically mailed and/or faxed to training program directors of critical care medicine and internal medicine departments, and to ICU directors in the state of Connecticut. The questionnaire listed common invasive medical procedures and asked the respondents to check those for which practitioners routinely obtain informed consent in their hospital. RESULTS: The three samples, national intensivists (88 respondents), Connecticut intensivists (29 respondents), and national internists (56 respondents) demonstrated heterogeneity of consenting practices. The rate of obtaining consent for common vascular access procedures ranged from 20 to 90%. The rates of obtaining consent for Foley catheterization and nasogastric intubation were uniformly < 10%, and those for endoscopic procedures were > 90%. Separate consent (beyond the general consent to treat) was not uniformly obtained for the transfusion of blood products (range, 74 to 93%) and common diagnostic medical procedures (eg, thoracentesis, paracentesis, or lumbar puncture; range, 77 to 96%). Surgical intensivists reported that the obtaining of consent for invasive procedures was less routine compared to medical intensivists. Lower rates of consent were noted by those respondents who used a "blanket" consent form, which was signed at the time of hospital admission, to cover subsequent procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In this relatively small sample, there was no uniform practice of informed consent for commonly performed invasive medical procedures. Consent was routinely obtained for GI endoscopy, bronchoscopy, and medical research, and was not obtained for Foley catheterization and nasogastric intubation. The obtaining of consent for vascular cannulation and diagnostic procedures was not routine in the ICUs of a substantial number of respondents. Explicit standards that delineate specifically which procedures require consent may be required to assure more uniform practices.
Entities:
Keywords:
Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship
Authors: Maria L Espinosa; Aaron M Tannenbaum; Megha Kilaru; Jennifer Stevens; Mark Siegler; Michael D Howell; William F Parker Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Mohannad A Awad; E Charles Osterberg; Helena Chang; Thomas W Gaither; Amjad Alwaal; Ryan Fox; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: Transl Androl Urol Date: 2016-10
Authors: Wouter Kg Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Saskia Houterman; Margot Veerman; Johan Legemaate; Marc R Scheltinga Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2013-01-21