Literature DB >> 22719519

2-Amino-cyclo-hexan-1-aminium thio-cyanate.

Halima F Salem1, Siti Aishah Hasbullah, Bohari M Yamin.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(6)H(15)N(2) (+)·NCS(-), was obtained unexpectedly from the reaction mixture of benzoyl chloride, ammonium thio-cyanate and cyclo-hexane-1,2-diamine. The cyclo-hexane ring adopts a chair conformation. In the crystal, N-H⋯S and N-H⋯N inter-actions involving the thio-cyanate anion and both the amine and the aminium N atoms link the mol-ecules, forming two-dimensional networks parallel to (001).

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22719519      PMCID: PMC3379321          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002 ▶). For related thio­cyanate structures, see: Selvakumaran et al. (2011 ▶); Khawar Rauf et al. (2008 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H15N2 +·NCS− M = 173.28 Orthorhombic, a = 8.590 (3) Å b = 12.885 (5) Å c = 17.237 (7) Å V = 1907.8 (13) Å3 Z = 8 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.29 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.50 × 0.50 × 0.25 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000 ▶) T min = 0.870, T max = 0.932 10172 measured reflections 1685 independent reflections 1449 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.028

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045 wR(F 2) = 0.112 S = 1.14 1685 reflections 100 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.25 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: SMART (Bruker,2000 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2000 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL, PARST (Nardelli, 1995 ▶) and PLATON. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020879/lr2062sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020879/lr2062Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812020879/lr2062Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H15N2+·NCSF(000) = 752
Mr = 173.28Dx = 1.207 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 2210 reflections
a = 8.590 (3) Åθ = 3.0–25.0°
b = 12.885 (5) ŵ = 0.29 mm1
c = 17.237 (7) ÅT = 298 K
V = 1907.8 (13) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 80.50 × 0.50 × 0.25 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer1685 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1449 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.028
Detector resolution: 83.66 pixels mm-1θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.0°
ω scanh = −10→10
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000)k = −15→12
Tmin = 0.870, Tmax = 0.932l = −20→18
10172 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.112H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.14w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.051P)2 + 0.6001P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1685 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
100 parametersΔρmax = 0.25 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
N10.87938 (18)0.27887 (13)0.03084 (9)0.0437 (4)
H1A0.94310.30730.06370.052*
H1B0.83430.32420.00650.052*
H1C0.93750.2357−0.00900.052*
N20.55776 (18)0.33551 (13)0.07851 (9)0.0436 (4)
H2A0.61300.39260.05160.052*
H2B0.47570.36380.11120.052*
C10.7706 (2)0.20856 (14)0.07357 (10)0.0354 (4)
H1D0.70770.17080.03550.043*
C20.8674 (2)0.13050 (15)0.11858 (12)0.0433 (5)
H2C0.93000.09020.08270.052*
H2D0.93740.16710.15320.052*
C30.7648 (3)0.05792 (16)0.16548 (12)0.0493 (5)
H3A0.70220.01620.13050.059*
H3B0.82970.01140.19570.059*
C40.6591 (3)0.11804 (17)0.21932 (12)0.0513 (5)
H4A0.72130.15390.25790.062*
H4B0.59040.07030.24620.062*
C50.5629 (2)0.19625 (16)0.17426 (11)0.0463 (5)
H5A0.50100.23660.21040.056*
H5B0.49190.15930.14030.056*
C60.6618 (2)0.26985 (14)0.12574 (10)0.0371 (4)
H6A0.72350.31410.16030.045*
S10.15812 (8)0.37823 (5)0.14873 (3)0.0610 (2)
N30.2362 (3)0.53658 (16)0.04577 (11)0.0678 (6)
C70.2023 (2)0.47221 (16)0.08883 (11)0.0443 (5)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0428 (9)0.0436 (9)0.0446 (9)0.0029 (7)0.0051 (7)0.0088 (7)
N20.0366 (8)0.0421 (9)0.0520 (10)0.0063 (7)0.0000 (7)0.0027 (7)
C10.0349 (9)0.0353 (10)0.0361 (9)−0.0039 (8)0.0002 (7)0.0009 (8)
C20.0421 (11)0.0409 (11)0.0469 (11)0.0055 (9)0.0019 (9)0.0032 (9)
C30.0586 (13)0.0400 (11)0.0493 (11)0.0026 (10)0.0020 (10)0.0085 (9)
C40.0582 (13)0.0522 (13)0.0435 (11)−0.0042 (10)0.0079 (10)0.0075 (9)
C50.0408 (10)0.0531 (12)0.0451 (10)−0.0008 (9)0.0078 (8)−0.0006 (9)
C60.0366 (10)0.0366 (10)0.0383 (9)−0.0002 (8)−0.0025 (8)−0.0029 (8)
S10.0708 (4)0.0589 (4)0.0535 (4)−0.0088 (3)0.0002 (3)0.0116 (3)
N30.0815 (15)0.0521 (12)0.0697 (12)0.0012 (11)0.0043 (11)0.0167 (11)
C70.0420 (11)0.0442 (12)0.0467 (11)0.0070 (9)−0.0023 (9)−0.0063 (10)
N1—C11.495 (2)C3—C41.512 (3)
N1—H1A0.8682C3—H3A0.9700
N1—H1B0.8173C3—H3B0.9700
N1—H1C1.0147C4—C51.517 (3)
N2—C61.475 (2)C4—H4A0.9700
N2—H2A0.9911C4—H4B0.9700
N2—H2B0.9740C5—C61.523 (3)
C1—C21.518 (3)C5—H5A0.9700
C1—C61.519 (2)C5—H5B0.9700
C1—H1D0.9800C6—H6A0.9800
C2—C31.518 (3)S1—C71.636 (2)
C2—H2C0.9700N3—C71.150 (3)
C2—H2D0.9700
C1—N1—H1A109.2C2—C3—H3A109.4
C1—N1—H1B112.9C4—C3—H3B109.4
H1A—N1—H1B109.4C2—C3—H3B109.4
C1—N1—H1C108.0H3A—C3—H3B108.0
H1A—N1—H1C111.2C3—C4—C5110.68 (17)
H1B—N1—H1C106.1C3—C4—H4A109.5
C6—N2—H2A113.2C5—C4—H4A109.5
C6—N2—H2B109.5C3—C4—H4B109.5
H2A—N2—H2B109.9C5—C4—H4B109.5
N1—C1—C2108.11 (15)H4A—C4—H4B108.1
N1—C1—C6111.17 (15)C4—C5—C6113.01 (16)
C2—C1—C6112.27 (15)C4—C5—H5A109.0
N1—C1—H1D108.4C6—C5—H5A109.0
C2—C1—H1D108.4C4—C5—H5B109.0
C6—C1—H1D108.4C6—C5—H5B109.0
C3—C2—C1111.24 (17)H5A—C5—H5B107.8
C3—C2—H2C109.4N2—C6—C1110.14 (15)
C1—C2—H2C109.4N2—C6—C5108.79 (15)
C3—C2—H2D109.4C1—C6—C5110.16 (15)
C1—C2—H2D109.4N2—C6—H6A109.2
H2C—C2—H2D108.0C1—C6—H6A109.2
C4—C3—C2111.09 (17)C5—C6—H6A109.2
C4—C3—H3A109.4N3—C7—S1178.2 (2)
N1—C1—C2—C3178.41 (15)C2—C1—C6—N2−173.39 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C355.4 (2)N1—C1—C6—C5−174.63 (15)
C1—C2—C3—C4−56.1 (2)C2—C1—C6—C5−53.4 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C555.6 (2)C4—C5—C6—N2174.46 (16)
C3—C4—C5—C6−55.2 (2)C4—C5—C6—C153.6 (2)
N1—C1—C6—N265.36 (19)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···S1i0.872.533.3914 (19)172
N1—H1B···N3ii0.822.102.895 (3)166
N1—H1C···N2iii1.011.832.841 (2)175
N2—H2A···N3ii0.992.313.231 (3)155
N2—H2B···S10.972.813.681 (2)149
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯S1i0.872.533.3914 (19)172
N1—H1B⋯N3ii0.822.102.895 (3)166
N1—H1C⋯N2iii1.011.832.841 (2)175
N2—H2A⋯N3ii0.992.313.231 (3)155
N2—H2B⋯S10.972.813.681 (2)149

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  5 in total

1.  The Cambridge Structural Database: a quarter of a million crystal structures and rising.

Authors:  Frank H Allen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2002-05-29

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Dicyclo-hexyl-ammonium thio-cyanate.

Authors:  M Khawar Rauf; Masahiro Ebihara; Amin Badshah
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-01-04

4.  Dicyclo-hexyl-ammonium thio-cyanate: monoclinic polymorph.

Authors:  N Selvakumaran; R Karvembu; Seik Weng Ng; Edward R T Tiekink
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-10-05

5.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  4-Chloro-anilinium thio-cyanate.

Authors:  Siti Fairus M Yusoff; F Salem Halima; Bohari M Yamin
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-06-02

2.  Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of 4-amino-pyridinium thio-cyanate-4-amino-pyridine (1/1).

Authors:  M Renugadevi; A Sinthiya; Kumaradhas Poomani; Suganya Suresh
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2020-08-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.