Literature DB >> 12350258

Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song.

Stephen Nowicki1, William A Searcy, Susan Peters.   

Abstract

Bird song is unusual as a sexually selected trait because its expression depends on learning as well as genetic and other environmental factors. Prior work has demonstrated that males who are deprived of the opportunity to learn produce songs that function little if at all in male-female interactions. We asked whether more subtle variation in male song-learning abilities influences female response to song. Using a copulation solicitation assay, we measured the response of female song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) to songs of laboratory-reared males that differed in the amount of learned versus invented material that they included and in the degree to which learned material accurately matched the model from which it was copied. Females responded significantly more to songs that had been learned better, by either measure. Females did not discriminate between the best-learned songs of laboratory-reared males and songs of wild males used as models during learning. These results provide, to our knowledge, a first experimental demonstration that variation in learning abilities among males plays a functionally important part in the expression of a sexually selected trait, and further provide support for the hypothesis that song functions as an indicator of male quality because it reflects variation in response to early developmental stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12350258      PMCID: PMC1691117          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  15 in total

1.  Song, sexual selection, and a song control nucleus (HVc) in the brains of European sedge warblers.

Authors:  D C Airey; K L Buchanan; T Szekely; C K Catchpole; T J DeVoogd
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  2000-07

2.  A critique of the neuroecology of learning and memory.

Authors:  Johan J. Bolhuis; Euan M. Macphail
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Song development by grey catbirds

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Social influences during song development in the song sparrow: a laboratory experiment simulating field conditions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Species identification in the North American cowbird: appropriate responses to abnormal song.

Authors:  A P King; M J West
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice.

Authors:  S Nowicki; D Hasselquist; S Bensch; S Peters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The development of within-song type variation in song sparrows.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Song as an indicator of parasitism in the sedge warbler.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Response of sparrows to songs of deaf and isolation-reared males: further evidence for innate auditory templates.

Authors:  W A Searcy; P Marler
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Brain space for learned song in birds develops independently of song learning.

Authors:  E A Brenowitz; K Lent; D E Kroodsma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Social learning strategies.

Authors:  Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Real estate ads in Emei music frog vocalizations: female preference for calls emanating from burrows.

Authors:  Jianguo Cui; Yezhong Tang; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Songbirds learn songs least degraded by environmental transmission.

Authors:  Susan Peters; Elizabeth P Derryberry; Stephen Nowicki
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Differential influence of frequency, timing, and intensity cues in a complex acoustic categorization task.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Helen M McLendon; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Africanized honeybees are slower learners than their European counterparts.

Authors:  Margaret J Couvillon; Gloria DeGrandi-Hoffman; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-11-11

6.  Balancing food and predator pressure induces chronic stress in songbirds.

Authors:  Michael Clinchy; Liana Zanette; Rudy Boonstra; John C Wingfield; James N M Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Typical versions of learned swamp sparrow song types are more effective signals than are less typical versions.

Authors:  R F Lachlan; R C Anderson; S Peters; W A Searcy; S Nowicki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Introduced parasite changes host phenotype, mating signal and hybridization risk: Philornis downsi effects on Darwin's finch song.

Authors:  Sonia Kleindorfer; Georgina Custance; Katharina J Peters; Frank J Sulloway
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Heavy metal pollution affects dawn singing behaviour in a small passerine bird.

Authors:  Leen Gorissen; Tinne Snoeijs; Els Van Duyse; Marcel Eens
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Early life conditions that impact song learning in male zebra finches also impact neural and behavioral responses to song in females.

Authors:  Kendra B Sewall; Rindy C Anderson; Jill A Soha; Susan Peters; Stephen Nowicki
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.