Literature DB >> 22718583

Computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a review of literature.

Valentin Michael Quack1, Susanne Kathrein, Bijörn Rath, Markus Tingart, Christian Lüring.   

Abstract

Computer-assisted navigation surgery (CAS) has been performed in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for approximately 10 years. This technique offers experienced and inexperienced surgeons improved control and reproducible results. Currently, 30% of primary total knee replacements are performed using the CAS technique in Germany. The main problems after total knee replacement are generally aseptic loosening, instability and infection. According to various authors, the main reason for aseptic loosening is an inadequate alignment of the mechanical limb axis. Several level I and II studies have demonstrated that CAS leads to significantly less axial deviation. Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against CAS for routine use, such as longer operation times and higher costs. Additionally, there are still no long-term results available that post a definitive statement about lower revision rates, declining numbers of aseptic loosening, cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes following CAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718583     DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2011-0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)        ISSN: 0013-5585            Impact factor:   1.411


  7 in total

Review 1.  Workflow and simulation of image-to-physical registration of holes inside spongy bone.

Authors:  Jan Bergmeier; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Dorothea Daentzer; Omid Majdani; Tobias Ortmaier; Lüder A Kahrs
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Does computer-assisted surgery influence survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis? A 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hervé Ouanezar; Florent Franck; Alexandre Jacquel; Vincent Pibarot; Julien Wegrzyn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Jan Dujardin; Hilde Vandenneucker; Nele Arnout; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  No influence of obesity on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty using a gap balancing technique.

Authors:  Raj Kanna; Ananth Brasanna; Gautam M Shetty; Chandramohan Ravichandran
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  Surgically modifiable factors measured by computer-navigation together with patient-specific factors predict knee society score after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Frank Lampe; Franziska Fiedler; Carlos J Marques; Anusch Sufi-Siavach; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Measurement for gap balancing technique in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a large retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Zhao Xuequan; Zhao Bin; Yao Shuzhang; Cao Kanduo; Ren Chongxi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 7.  An umbrella review comparing computer-assisted and conventional total joint arthroplasty: quality assessment and summary of evidence.

Authors:  Mohamed Mosaad Hasan; Manrui Zhang; Matthew Beal; Hassan M K Ghomrawi
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2020-01-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.