Literature DB >> 33717948

No influence of obesity on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty using a gap balancing technique.

Raj Kanna1, Ananth Brasanna1, Gautam M Shetty2, Chandramohan Ravichandran1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In obese patients, thick subcutaneous tissue can introduce errors during registration and leg weight can influence gap balancing in navigated TKA. Present study is done to determine if computer navigated TKA using a gap balancing technique can achieve consistent accuracy for limb and component alignment, and similar clinical and functional results in obese patients like in non-obese patients.
METHODS: We prospectively compared the radiological, clinical, and functional results of 78 knees in 57 non-obese patients and 79 knees in 58 obese patients who underwent computer-assisted TKA. Non-obese individuals were defined as those having BMI of <30 kg/m2 and obese individuals as BMI ≥30 kg/m2. The degree of knee deformity was calculated by Hip - Knee - Ankle (HKA) angle and clinical and functional assessment was done using the Knee Society Score - clinical knee score and Knee Society Score - function score, respectively. All these were documented before and at 6 months, 2 year, and 5 years after TKA.
RESULTS: The outlier rate of postoperative limb alignment (HKA angle) was 8.9% in the obese group which was not significantly different (p =1.00) from that of the non-obese group (7.7%). Mean clinical knee scores were not significantly different between the non-obese and obese groups preoperatively (58.8 vs 57.4, p = 0.14) and at 6 months (92.7 vs 91, p = 0.06), 2 years (91.4 vs 90, p = 0.07), and 5 years (92.4 vs 91.3, p = 0.1) post-surgery. Similarly, mean functional scores were not significantly different between the non-obese and obese groups preoperatively (50.9 vs 49.9, p = 0.31) and at 6 months (92.7 vs 90.9, p = 0.06), 2 years (91.3 vs 92, p = 0.44), and 5 years (90.6 vs 91.1, p = 0.51) post-surgery.
CONCLUSION: Obesity has no influence on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer navigated TKA, done by gap balancing technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II.
© 2021 Delhi Orthopedic Association. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted knee replacement; Functional results in obesity; Gap balancing technique; Knee navigation in obesity; Limb alignment in obesity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33717948      PMCID: PMC7920157          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  33 in total

1.  Does body weight influence outcome after total knee arthroplasty? A 1-year analysis.

Authors:  R G Deshmukh; J H Hayes; I M Pinder
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  J Bohannon Mason; Thomas K Fehring; Rhonda Estok; Deirdre Banel; Kyle Fahrbach
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jelle P van der List; Harshvardhan Chawla; Leo Joskowicz; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Twelve-Year Follow-Up of Navigated Computer-Assisted Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial.

Authors:  Johannes Cip; Florian Obwegeser; Thomas Benesch; Christian Bach; Paul Ruckenstuhl; Arno Martin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  No effect of obesity on limb and component alignment after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gautam M Shetty; Arun B Mullaji; Sagar Bhayde; A P Lingaraju
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Masahiro Hasegawa; Shinichi Miyazaki; Toshio Yamaguchi; Hiroki Wakabayashi; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study at three years follow-up.

Authors:  C Martín-Hernández; M Sanz-Sainz; C Revenga-Giertych; D Hernández-Vaquero; J M Fernández-Carreira; J Albareda-Albareda; A Castillo-Palacios; M Ranera-Garcia
Journal:  Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2018-03-28

8.  Clinical outcome using a ligament referencing technique in CAS versus conventional technique.

Authors:  K Lehnen; K Giesinger; R Warschkow; M Porter; E Koch; M S Kuster
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Does Obesity Affect Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty? Minimum 5-Year Follow-up of Minimally Invasive TKA in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Ju-Hyung Yoo; Hyun-Cheol Oh; Sang-Hoon Park; Jin-Kyu Kim; Sang-Hee Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-08-22

10.  Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty: The outcomes at mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Robert Wen-Wei Hsu; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Wun-Jer Shen; Wei-Bin Hsu; Shr-Hsin Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.