Literature DB >> 22718428

Advancing sustainable bioenergy: evolving stakeholder interests and the relevance of research.

Timothy Lawrence Johnson1, Jeffrey M Bielicki, Rebecca S Dodder, Michael R Hilliard, P Ozge Kaplan, C Andrew Miller.   

Abstract

The sustainability of future bioenergy production rests on more than continual improvements in its environmental, economic, and social impacts. The emergence of new biomass feedstocks, an expanding array of conversion pathways, and expected increases in overall bioenergy production are connecting diverse technical, social, and policy communities. These stakeholder groups have different-and potentially conflicting-values and cultures, and therefore different goals and decision making processes. Our aim is to discuss the implications of this diversity for bioenergy researchers. The paper begins with a discussion of bioenergy stakeholder groups and their varied interests, and illustrates how this diversity complicates efforts to define and promote "sustainable" bioenergy production. We then discuss what this diversity means for research practice. Researchers, we note, should be aware of stakeholder values, information needs, and the factors affecting stakeholder decision making if the knowledge they generate is to reach its widest potential use. We point out how stakeholder participation in research can increase the relevance of its products, and argue that stakeholder values should inform research questions and the choice of analytical assumptions. Finally, we make the case that additional natural science and technical research alone will not advance sustainable bioenergy production, and that important research gaps relate to understanding stakeholder decision making and the need, from a broader social science perspective, to develop processes to identify and accommodate different value systems. While sustainability requires more than improved scientific and technical understanding, the need to understand stakeholder values and manage diversity presents important research opportunities.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22718428     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9884-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  15 in total

1.  Environment and development. Sustainability science.

Authors:  R W Kates; W C Clark; R Corell; J M Hall; C C Jaeger; I Lowe; J J McCarthy; H J Schellnhuber; B Bolin; N M Dickson; S Faucheux; G C Gallopin; A Grübler; B Huntley; J Jäger; N S Jodha; R E Kasperson; A Mabogunje; P Matson; H Mooney; B Moore; T O'Riordan; U Svedlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals.

Authors:  Alexander E Farrell; Richard J Plevin; Brian T Turner; Andrew D Jones; Michael O'Hare; Daniel M Kammen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Greater transportation energy and GHG offsets from bioelectricity than ethanol.

Authors:  J E Campbell; D B Lobell; C B Field
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important?

Authors:  Jerry M Melillo; John M Reilly; David W Kicklighter; Angelo C Gurgel; Timothy W Cronin; Sergey Paltsev; Benjamin S Felzer; Xiaodong Wang; Andrei P Sokolov; C Adam Schlosser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Markets, climate change, and food security in West Africa.

Authors:  Molly E Brown; Beat Hintermann; Nathaniel Higgins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Crop residues: the rest of the story.

Authors:  Douglas L Karlen; Rattan Lal; Ronald F Follett; John M Kimble; Jerry L Hatfield; John M Miranowski; Cynthia A Cambardella; Andrew Manale; Robert P Anex; Charles W Rice
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: what do we really know?

Authors:  Pamela R D Williams; Daniel Inman; Andy Aden; Garvin A Heath
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt.

Authors:  Joseph Fargione; Jason Hill; David Tilman; Stephen Polasky; Peter Hawthorne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development.

Authors:  David W Cash; William C Clark; Frank Alcock; Nancy M Dickson; Noelle Eckley; David H Guston; Jill Jäger; Ronald B Mitchell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 10.  Biofuels: network analysis of the literature reveals key environmental and economic unknowns.

Authors:  Caroline E Ridley; Christopher M Clark; Stephen D Leduc; Britta G Bierwagen; Brenda B Lin; Adrea Mehl; David A Tobias
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  3 in total

1.  Communicating about bioenergy sustainability.

Authors:  Virginia H Dale; Keith L Kline; Donna Perla; Al Lucier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Environmental indicators of biofuel sustainability: what about context?

Authors:  Rebecca A Efroymson; Virginia H Dale; Keith L Kline; Allen C McBride; Jeffrey M Bielicki; Raymond L Smith; Esther S Parish; Peter E Schweizer; Denice M Shaw
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Environmental key performance indicators: the role of regulations and stakeholder influence.

Authors:  Ewelina Zarzycka; Joanna Krasodomska
Journal:  Environ Syst Decis       Date:  2021-07-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.