Literature DB >> 19423776

Greater transportation energy and GHG offsets from bioelectricity than ethanol.

J E Campbell1, D B Lobell, C B Field.   

Abstract

The quantity of land available to grow biofuel crops without affecting food prices or greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from land conversion is limited. Therefore, bioenergy should maximize land-use efficiency when addressing transportation and climate change goals. Biomass could power either internal combustion or electric vehicles, but the relative land-use efficiency of these two energy pathways is not well quantified. Here, we show that bioelectricity outperforms ethanol across a range of feedstocks, conversion technologies, and vehicle classes. Bioelectricity produces an average of 81% more transportation kilometers and 108% more emissions offsets per unit area of cropland than does cellulosic ethanol. These results suggest that alternative bioenergy pathways have large differences in how efficiently they use the available land to achieve transportation and climate goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19423776     DOI: 10.1126/science.1168885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  10 in total

1.  Advancing sustainable bioenergy: evolving stakeholder interests and the relevance of research.

Authors:  Timothy Lawrence Johnson; Jeffrey M Bielicki; Rebecca S Dodder; Michael R Hilliard; P Ozge Kaplan; C Andrew Miller
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Microbial electrosynthesis - revisiting the electrical route for microbial production.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; René A Rozendal
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States.

Authors:  Christopher W Tessum; Jason D Hill; Julian D Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparative efficiency and driving range of light- and heavy-duty vehicles powered with biomass energy stored in liquid fuels or batteries.

Authors:  Mark Laser; Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Functional characterization of poplar wood-associated NAC domain transcription factors.

Authors:  Ruiqin Zhong; Chanhui Lee; Zheng-Hua Ye
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Energy efficiency analysis: biomass-to-wheel efficiency related with biofuels production, fuel distribution, and powertrain systems.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Huang; Y-H Percival Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fungal fermentation on anaerobic digestate for lipid-based biofuel production.

Authors:  Yuan Zhong; Zhiguo Liu; Christine Isaguirre; Yan Liu; Wei Liao
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Biomass for thermochemical conversion: targets and challenges.

Authors:  Paul Tanger; John L Field; Courtney E Jahn; Morgan W Defoort; Jan E Leach
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Abatement cost of GHG emissions for wood-based electricity and ethanol at production and consumption levels.

Authors:  Puneet Dwivedi; Madhu Khanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chemical profiling of Jatropha tissues under different torrefaction conditions: application to biomass waste recovery.

Authors:  Taiji Watanabe; Amiu Shino; Kinya Akashi; Jun Kikuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.