Literature DB >> 19673263

Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: what do we really know?

Pamela R D Williams1, Daniel Inman, Andy Aden, Garvin A Heath.   

Abstract

In this paper, we assess what is known or anticipated about environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels relative to the primary conventional biofuels (i.e., corn grain-based ethanol and soybean-based diesel) in the United States during feedstock production and conversion processes. Factors considered include greenhouse (GHG) emissions, air pollutant emissions, soil health and quality, water use and water quality, wastewater and solid waste streams, and biodiversity and land-use changes. Based on our review of the available literature, we find that the production of next-generation feedstocks in the U.S. (e.g., municipal solid waste, forest residues, dedicated energy crops, microalgae) are expected to fare better than corn-grain or soybean production on most of these factors, although the magnitude of these differences may vary significantly among feedstocks. Ethanol produced using a biochemical or thermochemical conversion platform is expected to result in fewer GHG and air pollutant emissions, but to have similar or potentially greater water demands and solid waste streams than conventional ethanol biorefineries in the U.S. However, these conversion-related differences are likely to be small, particularly relative to those associated with feedstock production. Modeling performed for illustrative purposes and to allow for standardized quantitative comparisons across feedstocks and conversion technologies generally confirms the findings from the literature. Despite current expectations, significant uncertainty remains regarding how well next-generation biofuels will fare on different environmental and sustainability factors when produced on a commercial scale in the U.S. Additional research is needed in several broad areas including quantifying impacts, designing standardized metrics and approaches, and developing decision-support tools to identify and quantify environmental trade-offs and ensure sustainable biofuels production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19673263     DOI: 10.1021/es900250d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  13 in total

1.  Advancing sustainable bioenergy: evolving stakeholder interests and the relevance of research.

Authors:  Timothy Lawrence Johnson; Jeffrey M Bielicki; Rebecca S Dodder; Michael R Hilliard; P Ozge Kaplan; C Andrew Miller
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Comparative life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol production: biochemical versus thermochemical conversion.

Authors:  Dongyan Mu; Thomas Seager; P Suresh Rao; Fu Zhao
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  TMDL implementation in agricultural landscapes: a communicative and systemic approach.

Authors:  Nicholas R Jordan; Carissa Schively Slotterback; Kirsten Valentine Cadieux; David J Mulla; David G Pitt; Laura Schmitt Olabisi; Jin-Oh Kim
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Bioenergy and Biodiversity: Key Lessons from the Pan American Region.

Authors:  Keith L Kline; Fernanda Silva Martinelli; Audrey L Mayer; Rodrigo Medeiros; Camila Ortolan F Oliveira; Gerd Sparovek; Arnaldo Walter; Lisa A Venier
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Evaluation of colour temperatures in the cultivation of Dunaliella salina and Nannochloropsis oculata in the production of lipids and carbohydrates.

Authors:  Salim Gabriel Pavón-Suriano; Luis Alfredo Ortega-Clemente; Sergio Curiel-Ramírez; María Isabel Jiménez-García; Ignacio Alejandro Pérez-Legaspi; Paula Natalia Robledo-Narváez
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Comparing scales of environmental effects from gasoline and ethanol production.

Authors:  Esther S Parish; Keith L Kline; Virginia H Dale; Rebecca A Efroymson; Allen C McBride; Timothy L Johnson; Michael R Hilliard; Jeffrey M Bielicki
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 7.  The potential of transgenic green microalgae; a robust photobioreactor to produce recombinant therapeutic proteins.

Authors:  Fariba Akbari; Morteza Eskandani; Ahmad Yari Khosroushahi
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  Engineering cyanobacteria as photosynthetic feedstock factories.

Authors:  Stephanie G Hays; Daniel C Ducat
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Rapid estimation of sugar release from winter wheat straw during bioethanol production using FTIR-photoacoustic spectroscopy.

Authors:  Georgios Bekiaris; Jane Lindedam; Clément Peltre; Stephen R Decker; Geoffrey B Turner; Jakob Magid; Sander Bruun
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Comprehensive environmental assessment: a meta-assessment approach.

Authors:  Christina M Powers; Genya Dana; Patricia Gillespie; Maureen R Gwinn; Christine Ogilvie Hendren; Thomas C Long; Amy Wang; J Michael Davis
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.