Literature DB >> 22712054

Effect of cargo properties on in situ forming implant behavior determined by noninvasive ultrasound imaging.

Luis Solorio1, Alexander M Olear, Haoyan Zhou, Ashlei C Beiswenger, Agata A Exner.   

Abstract

Diagnostic ultrasound has been shown to be an effective method for the noninvasive characterization of in situ forming implant behavior both in vivo and in vitro through the evaluation of the echogenic signal that forms as a consequence of the polymer phase transition from liquid to solid. The kinetics of this phase transition have a direct effect on drug release and can be altered through factors that change the mass transfer events of the solvent and aqueous environment, including properties of the entrapped active agent. This study examined the effect of payload properties on implant phase inversion, swelling, drug release, and polymer degradation. Poly(DL-lactide-co-gylcolide) implants were loaded with either: sodium fluorescein, bovine serum albumin (BSA), doxorubicin (Dox), or 1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI). Fluorescein and Dox were released at near equivalent rates throughout the diffusion phase of release but due to differing drug-matrix interactions, Dox-loaded implants released a lower mass of drug during the degradation phase of release. DiI was not readily released, and due to increased depot hydrophobicity, resulted in significantly lower swelling than the other formulations. The initial echogenicity was higher in Dox-loaded implants than those loaded with fluorescein, but after the initial precipitation, phase inversion and drug release occurred at near equivalent rates for both Dox and fluorescein-loaded implants. Nonlinear mathematical fitting was used to correlate drug release and phase inversion, providing a noninvasive method for evaluating implant release (R(2)>0.97 for Dox, BSA, and fluorescein; DiI had a correlation coefficient of 0.56).

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22712054      PMCID: PMC3375723          DOI: 10.1007/s13346-011-0054-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res        ISSN: 2190-393X            Impact factor:   4.617


  37 in total

1.  Role of crystallization in the phase inversion dynamics and protein release kinetics of injectable drug delivery systems.

Authors:  J R DesNoyer; A J McHugh
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 2.  Biodegradable injectable in situ forming drug delivery systems.

Authors:  A Hatefi; B Amsden
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2002-04-23       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Effect of injection site on in situ implant formation and drug release in vivo.

Authors:  Ravi B Patel; Luis Solorio; Hanping Wu; Tianyi Krupka; Agata A Exner
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 4.  Drug-eluting polymer implants in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Agata A Exner; Gerald M Saidel
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.648

5.  In vitro and in vivo study of thymosin alpha1 biodegradable in situ forming poly(lactide-co-glycolide) implants.

Authors:  Qingfeng Liu; He Zhang; Guichen Zhou; Shaobo Xie; Hao Zou; Yuan Yu; Guodong Li; Duxin Sun; Guoqing Zhang; Ying Lu; Yanqiang Zhong
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 5.875

6.  Green preparation process, characterization and antitumor effects of doxorubicin-BSA-dextran nanoparticles.

Authors:  Wei Deng; Juan Li; Ping Yao; Fen He; Chong Huang
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.979

7.  The effect of Pluronic on the protein release kinetics of an injectable drug delivery system.

Authors:  J R DesNoyer; A J McHugh
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  Chemotherapeutic drug transport to brain tumor.

Authors:  Davis Yohanes Arifin; Kam Yiu Timothy Lee; Chi-Hwa Wang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Do in situ forming PLG/NMP implants behave similar in vitro and in vivo? A non-invasive and quantitative EPR investigation on the mechanisms of the implant formation process.

Authors:  Sabine Kempe; Hendrik Metz; Karsten Mäder
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 9.776

10.  Non-invasive in vivo evaluation of in situ forming PLGA implants by benchtop magnetic resonance imaging (BT-MRI) and EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sabine Kempe; Hendrik Metz; Priscila G C Pereira; Karsten Mäder
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 5.571

View more
  12 in total

1.  The Effect of Additives on the Behavior of Phase Sensitive In Situ Forming Implants.

Authors:  Luis Solorio; Divya Sundarapandiyan; Alex Olear; Agata A Exner
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Macroporous acrylamide phantoms improve prediction of in vivo performance of in situ forming implants.

Authors:  Christopher Hernandez; Natalia Gawlik; Monika Goss; Haoyan Zhou; Selva Jeganathan; Danielle Gilbert; Agata A Exner
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Ultrasound-guided intratumoral delivery of doxorubicin from in situ forming implants in a hepatocellular carcinoma model.

Authors:  Luis Solorio; Hanping Wu; Christopher Hernandez; Mihika Gangolli; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2016

4.  Increasing Distribution of Drugs Released from In Situ Forming PLGA Implants Using Therapeutic Ultrasound.

Authors:  Chawan Manaspon; Christopher Hernandez; Pinunta Nittayacharn; Selva Jeganathan; Norased Nasongkla; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Noninvasive characterization of in situ forming implant diffusivity using diffusion-weighted MRI.

Authors:  Kelsey A Hopkins; Nicole Vike; Xin Li; Jacqueline Kennedy; Emma Simmons; Joseph Rispoli; Luis Solorio
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Biomedical Imaging in Implantable Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Haoyan Zhou; Christopher Hernandez; Monika Goss; Anna Gawlik; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.465

7.  Effects of Drug Physicochemical Properties on In-Situ Forming Implant Polymer Degradation and Drug Release Kinetics.

Authors:  Jordan B Joiner; Alka Prasher; Isabella C Young; Jessie Kim; Roopali Shrivastava; Panita Maturavongsadit; Soumya Rahima Benhabbour
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.525

8.  Effect of the Subcutaneous Environment on Phase-Sensitive In Situ-Forming Implant Drug Release, Degradation, and Microstructure.

Authors:  Luis Solorio; Agata A Exner
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.534

9.  Noninvasive characterization of the effect of varying PLGA molecular weight blends on in situ forming implant behavior using ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Luis Solorio; Alexander M Olear; Jesse I Hamilton; Ravi B Patel; Ashlei C Beiswenger; Jon E Wallace; Haoyan Zhou; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Ultra-long-acting tunable biodegradable and removable controlled release implants for drug delivery.

Authors:  S Rahima Benhabbour; Martina Kovarova; Clinton Jones; Daijha J Copeland; Roopali Shrivastava; Michael D Swanson; Craig Sykes; Phong T Ho; Mackenzie L Cottrell; Anush Sridharan; Samantha M Fix; Orrin Thayer; Julie M Long; Daria J Hazuda; Paul A Dayton; Russell J Mumper; Angela D M Kashuba; J Victor Garcia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.