Literature DB >> 22709404

Monkey lipsmacking develops like the human speech rhythm.

Ryan J Morrill1, Annika Paukner, Pier F Ferrari, Asif A Ghazanfar.   

Abstract

Across all languages studied to date, audiovisual speech exhibits a consistent rhythmic structure. This rhythm is critical to speech perception. Some have suggested that the speech rhythm evolved de novo in humans. An alternative account--the one we explored here--is that the rhythm of speech evolved through the modification of rhythmic facial expressions. We tested this idea by investigating the structure and development of macaque monkey lipsmacks and found that their developmental trajectory is strikingly similar to the one that leads from human infant babbling to adult speech. Specifically, we show that: (1) younger monkeys produce slower, more variable mouth movements and as they get older, these movements become faster and less variable; and (2) this developmental pattern does not occur for another cyclical mouth movement--chewing. These patterns parallel human developmental patterns for speech and chewing. They suggest that, in both species, the two types of rhythmic mouth movements use different underlying neural circuits that develop in different ways. Ultimately, both lipsmacking and speech converge on a ~5 Hz rhythm that represents the frequency that characterizes the speech rhythm of human adults. We conclude that monkey lipsmacking and human speech share a homologous developmental mechanism, lending strong empirical support to the idea that the human speech rhythm evolved from the rhythmic facial expressions of our primate ancestors.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22709404      PMCID: PMC3383808          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01149.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  47 in total

1.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Huan Luo; David Poeppel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  The processing of audio-visual speech: empirical and neural bases.

Authors:  Ruth Campbell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Characteristics of masticatory mandibular movements and velocity in growing individuals and young adults.

Authors:  S Kiliaridis; S Karlsson; H Kjellberg
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation.

Authors:  N F Dronkers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.

Authors:  R Drullman; J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Babbling, chewing, and sucking: oromandibular coordination at 9 months.

Authors:  Roger W Steeve; Christopher A Moore; Jordan R Green; Kevin J Reilly; Jacki Ruark McMurtrey
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The natural statistics of audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran; Andrea Trubanova; Sébastien Stillittano; Alice Caplier; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Phrasing in prelinguistic vocalizations.

Authors:  M P Lynch; D K Oller; M L Steffens; E H Buder
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.038

10.  Social feedback to infants' babbling facilitates rapid phonological learning.

Authors:  Michael H Goldstein; Jennifer A Schwade
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-05
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Facial expressions and the evolution of the speech rhythm.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Daniel Y Takahashi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Modification of spectral features by nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Daniel J Weiss; Cara F Hotchkin; Susan E Parks
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Chimpanzee lip-smacks confirm primate continuity for speech-rhythm evolution.

Authors:  André S Pereira; Eithne Kavanagh; Catherine Hobaiter; Katie E Slocombe; Adriano R Lameira
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  The evolution of speech: vision, rhythm, cooperation.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Daniel Y Takahashi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Cineradiography of monkey lip-smacking reveals putative precursors of speech dynamics.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Daniel Y Takahashi; Neil Mathur; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Neonatal imitation predicts how infants engage with faces.

Authors:  Annika Paukner; Elizabeth A Simpson; Pier F Ferrari; Timothy Mrozek; Stephen J Suomi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-07-04

7.  Monkeys are perceptually tuned to facial expressions that exhibit a theta-like speech rhythm.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Ryan J Morrill; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Framing a socio-indexical basis for the emergence and cultural transmission of phonological systems.

Authors:  Andrew R Plummer; Mary E Beckman
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-11-01

9.  Multisensory vocal communication in primates and the evolution of rhythmic speech.

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  The evolutionary origins of natural pedagogy: Rhesus monkeys show sustained attention following nonsocial cues versus social communicative signals.

Authors:  Rosemary Bettle; Alexandra G Rosati
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.