Literature DB >> 22707749

Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes.

Mark Pallis1, Kenneth L Cameron, Steven J Svoboda, Brett D Owens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, particularly sprains, are common in athletic populations and may result in significant time lost to injury. However, surprisingly, little is known of the epidemiology of this injury.
PURPOSE: To define the incidence of AC joint injuries and to determine the risk factors for injury. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study.
METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study was performed to determine the incidence and characteristics of AC joint injury at the United States Military Academy between 2005 and 2009. All suspected AC joint injuries were reviewed by an independent orthopaedic surgeon using both chart reviews as well as assessments of radiological imaging studies. Injuries were graded according to the modified Rockwood classification system as well as dichotomized into low-grade (Rockwood types I and II) and high-grade (Rockwood types III, IV, V, and VI) injuries for analysis. Injury mechanisms, return-to-play timing, and athlete-exposures were documented and analyzed. χ(2) and Poisson regression analyses were performed, with statistical significance set at P < .05.
RESULTS: During the study period, 162 new AC joint injuries and 17,606 person-years at risk were documented, for an overall incidence rate of 9.2 per 1000 person-years. The majority of the AC joint injuries were low-grade (145 sprains, 89%) injuries, with 17 high-grade injuries. Overall, male patients experienced a significantly higher incidence rate for AC joint injuries than female patients (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21-4.31). An AC joint injury occurred most commonly during athletics (91%). The incidence rate of AC joint injury was significantly higher in intercollegiate athletes than intramural athletics when using athlete-exposure as a measure of person-time at risk (IRR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.31-3.56). Similarly, the incidence rate of AC injury was significantly higher among male intercollegiate athletes when compared to female athletes (IRR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.74-8.49) when using athlete-exposure as the denominator. The intercollegiate sports of men's rugby, wrestling, and hockey had the highest incidence rate of AC joint injury. Acromioclavicular injuries resulted in at least 1359 total days lost to injury and an average of 18.4 days lost per athlete. The average time lost to injury for low-grade sprains was 10.4 days compared with high-grade injuries at 63.7 days. Of the patients with high-grade injuries, 71% elected to undergo coracoclavicular/AC reconstructions. The rate of surgical intervention was 19 times higher for high-grade AC joint injuries than for low-grade injuries (IRR, 19.2; 95% CI, 7.64-48.23; P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: Acromioclavicular separations are relatively common in young athletes. Most injuries occur during contact sports such as rugby, wrestling, and hockey. Male athletes are at greater risk than female athletes. Intercollegiate athletes are at greater risk than intramural athletes. The average time lost to sport due to AC joint injury was 18 days, with low-grade injuries averaging 10 days lost. High-grade injuries averaged 64 days lost to sport, and 71% elected to undergo surgical repair/reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22707749     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512450162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  57 in total

1.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair.

Authors:  Lukas Weiser; Jakob V Nüchtern; Kay Sellenschloh; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Johannes M Rueger; Michael Hoffmann; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lars G Großterlinden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Horizontal and Vertical Stabilization of Acute Unstable Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries Arthroscopy-Assisted.

Authors:  Luis Natera Cisneros; Juan Sarasquete Reiriz; Marina Besalduch; Alexandru Petrica; Ana Escolà; Joaquim Rodriguez; Jan Carlo Fallone
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-11-23

3.  Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments with semitendinosus tendon graft: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Mario Fodale; Luigi Capasso; Gianpiero Cazzato; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-05-08

Review 4.  Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries.

Authors:  Akshay Phadke; Nik Bakti; Rajesh Bawale; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-01

5.  Superior clavicle drilling points and fluoroscopic inclination for anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takenaga; Masahito Yoshida; Richard E Debski; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl; Albert Lin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Allo- and autografts show comparable outcomes in chronic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Martin Eigenschink; Philipp R Heuberer; Leo Pauzenberger; Grant E Garrigues; Leonard Achenbach; Sigbjorn Dimmen; Brenda Laky; Lior Laver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Acromion morphology and bone mineral density distribution suggest favorable fixation points for anatomic acromioclavicular reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Felix Dyrna; Andrea Achtnich; Alex Hoberman; Elifho Obopilwe; Andreas B Imhoff; Augustus D Mazzocca; Knut Beitzel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Return to sport after acute acromioclavicular stabilization: a randomized control of double-suture-button system versus clavicular hook plate compared to uninjured shoulder sport athletes.

Authors:  D Müller; Y Reinig; R Hoffmann; M Blank; F Welsch; U Schweigkofler; T Stein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Evaluation of three-dimensional in vivo scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm between shoulders with a clavicle hook plate and contralateral healthy shoulders.

Authors:  HoeJeong Chung; DooSup Kim; Scott A Banks; JongSang Son; YoungHo Kim; MyoungGi On; JunSeop Yeom
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Acromioclavicular injuries in professional athletes].

Authors:  M Tauber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.