Literature DB >> 31061573

Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries.

Akshay Phadke1, Nik Bakti1, Rajesh Bawale1, Bijayendra Singh1.   

Abstract

Acromioclavicular joint injury is common in young individuals who suffer direct trauma to the shoulder. Treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation is controversial with regards to the indication of operative management, timing of surgery, whether to perform open or arthroscopic surgery, method of stabilisation (rigid or non-rigid) and type of graft used for repair or reconstruction. Current evidence supports conservative management for Rockwood types I and II, while types IV, V and VI benefit from surgery. The optimal management of type III injuries in high demand patients remains contentious. Surgical options include acromioclavicular fixation, coracoclavicular fixation and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Few studies with a low level of evidence suggest arthroscopic techniques and anatomical ligament reconstruction have better outcomes when compared to older techniques of rigid coracoclavicular fixation. The aim of this article is to look at the current evidence and address these controversial issues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular dislocation; Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular reconstruction; Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction; Hookplate; Rockwood classification

Year:  2019        PMID: 31061573      PMCID: PMC6491924          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  48 in total

1.  Salvage of failed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon from the knee. Surgical technique and case report.

Authors:  H P Jones; M J Lemos; A A Schepsis
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Structural properties of the intact and the reconstructed coracoclavicular ligament complex.

Authors:  R I Harris; A L Wallace; G D Harper; J A Goldberg; D H Sonnabend; W R Walsh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Stephen A Santangelo; Sean T Johnson; Clifford G Rios; Mark L Dumonski; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment.

Authors:  C Gstettner; M Tauber; W Hitzl; H Resch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Complications after open distal clavicle excision.

Authors:  Efstathis Chronopoulos; Harpreet S Gill; Michael T Freehill; Steve A Petersen; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Arthroscopic reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  E M Wolf; W T Pennington
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Paolo R Rolla; Michele F Surace; Luigi Murena
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment.

Authors:  Olaf Rolf; Andreas Hann von Weyhern; Alexander Ewers; Thomas Dirk Boehm; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Chronic acromioclavicular separation: the medium term results of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using braided polyester prosthetic ligament.

Authors:  In-Ho Jeon; Girish Dewnany; Richard Hartley; Lars Neumann; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Biomechanical and radiographic analysis of partial coracoclavicular ligament injuries.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Jeffrey T Spang; Rudy R Rodriguez; Clifford G Rios; Kevin P Shea; Anthony A Romeo; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.

Authors:  Marcel Js Tamaoki; Mário Lenza; Fabio T Matsunaga; João Carlos Belloti; Marcelo H Matsumoto; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

Review 2.  Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Theodorakys Marín Fermín; Jean Michel Hovsepian; Víctor Miguel Rodrigues Fernandes; Ioannis Terzidis; Emmanouil Papakostas; Jason Koh
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

3.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction implants have differing ability to restore horizontal and vertical plane stability.

Authors:  Mohamed Alkoheji; Hadi El-Daou; Jillian Lee; Adrian Carlos; Livio Di Mascio; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clavicular hook plate for acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocation involving Rockwood type V: clinical and radiological outcomes and complications evaluation.

Authors:  Fuguo Huang; Tengbo Yu; Guoming Liu; Yanling Hu; Fagang Ye
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.479

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.