Literature DB >> 22706913

Combination of chemical suppression techniques for dual suppression of fat and silicone at diffusion-weighted MR imaging in women with breast implants.

Dow-Mu Koh1, M Blackledge, S Burns, J Hughes, A Stemmer, B Kiefer, M O Leach, D J Collins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Silicone breast prostheses prove technically challenging when performing diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the breasts. We describe a combined fat and chemical suppression scheme to achieve dual suppression of fat and silicone, thereby improving the quality of diffusion-weighted images in women with breast implants.
METHODS: MR imaging was performed at 3.0 and 1.5 T in women with silicone breast implants using short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) fat-suppressed echo-planar (EPI) diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) on its own and combined with the slice-select gradient-reversal (SSGR) technique. Imaging was performed using dedicated breast imaging coils.
RESULTS: Complete suppression of the fat and silicone signal was possible at 3.0 T using EPI DWI with STIR and SSGR, evaluated with dedicated breast coils. However, a residual silicone signal was still perceptible at 1.5 T using this combined approach. Nevertheless, a further reduction in silicone signal at 1.5 T could be achieved by employing thinner slice partitions and the addition of the chemical-selective fat-suppression (CHESS) technique.
CONCLUSIONS: DWI using combined STIR and SSGR chemical suppression techniques is feasible to eliminate or reduce silicone signal from prosthetic breast implants. KEY POINTS: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently needed following breast implants. Unsuppressed signal from silicone creates artefacts on diffusion-weighted MR sequences. Dual fat/chemical suppression can eliminate signal from fat and silicone. STIR with slice selective gradient reversal can suppress fat and silicone signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22706913     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2531-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  13 in total

1.  In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization.

Authors:  Shantanu Sinha; Flora Anne Lucas-Quesada; Usha Sinha; Nanette DeBruhl; Lawrence W Bassett
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Interleaved water and fat imaging and applications to lipid quantitation using the gradient reversal technique.

Authors:  Haiying Tang; Ed X Wu; Richard Kennan; Haiying Liu; Donald S Williams
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Revathi S Murthy; Ali Ziadloo; Steven W White; Kimberly H Allison; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?

Authors:  Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Katja Pinker; Günther Grabner; Andreas Stadlbauer; Michael Weber; Ewald Moser; Thomas H Helbich; Siegfried Trattnig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Diffusion weighted imaging of the normal breast: reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and variation with menstrual cycle and menopausal status.

Authors:  Elizabeth A M O'Flynn; Veronica A Morgan; Sharon L Giles; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Gradient reversal technique and its applications to chemical-shift-related NMR imaging.

Authors:  H W Park; D J Kim; Z H Cho
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.

Authors:  Riham H Ei Khouli; Michael A Jacobs; Sarah D Mezban; Peng Huang; Ihab R Kamel; Katarzyna J Macura; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Robust fat suppression at 3T in high-resolution diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging of human brain.

Authors:  Joelle E Sarlls; Carlo Pierpaoli; S Lalith Talagala; Wen-Ming Luh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.

Authors:  Till-Alexander Heusner; Sherko Kuemmel; Angela Koeninger; Monia E Hamami; Steffen Hahn; Anton Quinsten; Andreas Bockisch; Michael Forsting; Thomas Lauenstein; Gerald Antoch; Alexander Stahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer-response evaluation and prediction of response to treatment using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  A Fangberget; L B Nilsen; K H Hole; M M Holmen; O Engebraaten; B Naume; H-J Smith; D R Olsen; T Seierstad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  5 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.

Authors:  L Nogueira; S Brandão; E Matos; R G Nunes; J Loureiro; H A Ferreira; I Ramos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  3-T breast diffusion-weighted MRI by echo-planar imaging with spectral spatial excitation or with additional spectral inversion recovery: an in vivo comparison of image quality.

Authors:  Megan C Jacobsen; Basak E Dogan; Beatriz E Adrada; Jeri Sue Plaxco; Wei Wei; Jong Bum Son; John D Hazle; Jingfei Ma
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Dual-energy CT for the evaluation of silicone breast implants.

Authors:  Thorsten R C Johnson; Isabelle Himsl; Karin Hellerhoff; Doris Mayr; Dorothea Rjosk-Dendorfer; Nina Ditsch; Bernhard Krauss; Klaus Friese; Maximilian F Reiser; Miriam S Lenhard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Implementing diffusion-weighted MRI for body imaging in prospective multicentre trials: current considerations and future perspectives.

Authors:  N M deSouza; J M Winfield; J C Waterton; A Weller; M-V Papoutsaki; S J Doran; D J Collins; L Fournier; D Sullivan; T Chenevert; A Jackson; M Boss; S Trattnig; Y Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Removing silicone artifacts in diffusion-weighted breast MRI by means of shift-resolved spatiotemporally encoding.

Authors:  Eddy Solomon; Noam Nissan; Rita Schmidt; Edna Furman-Haran; Uriel Ben-Aharon; Lucio Frydman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 4.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.