BACKGROUND: Serum soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) is recommended as a sensitive and accurate measure of iron deficiency (ID) in populations when only a single indicator can be used. The lack of assay standardization and of representative data on the distribution of sTfR in at-risk populations currently limits its utility. METHODS: Using data from NHANES 2003-2010, we examined the distribution of sTfR and developed assay-specific cutoff values for defining elevated sTfR in 2 US populations groups: children aged 1-5 y (n=2820) and non-pregnant women aged 15-49 y (n=6575). RESULTS: On average, children had higher geometric mean sTfR concentrations (4.09 mg/l; 95% CI: 4.04-4.14) than non-pregnant women (3.31 mg/l; 95% CI: 3.26-3.35) (p<0.001). Among children, those aged 1-2 y (compared to those aged 3-5 y), boys (compared to girls), and non-Hispanic black (NHB) children (compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) and Mexican-American (MA) children) had higher sTfR concentrations. Among non-pregnant women, adolescents (15-19 y) had higher sTfR concentrations than adults aged 20-34 y but not compared to adults aged 35-49 y; NHB women (compared to NHW and MA women) and multiparous women (compared to nulliparous women) had higher sTfR concentrations. The derived cutoff values (97.5th percentile in a defined healthy reference population) for defining elevated sTfR in the US were 6.00 mg/l for children 1-5 y and 5.33 mg/l for non-pregnant women 15-49 y. CONCLUSIONS: A different sTfR cutoff value may be needed in children and non-pregnant women to define ID. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Serum soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) is recommended as a sensitive and accurate measure of iron deficiency (ID) in populations when only a single indicator can be used. The lack of assay standardization and of representative data on the distribution of sTfR in at-risk populations currently limits its utility. METHODS: Using data from NHANES 2003-2010, we examined the distribution of sTfR and developed assay-specific cutoff values for defining elevated sTfR in 2 US populations groups: children aged 1-5 y (n=2820) and non-pregnant women aged 15-49 y (n=6575). RESULTS: On average, children had higher geometric mean sTfR concentrations (4.09 mg/l; 95% CI: 4.04-4.14) than non-pregnant women (3.31 mg/l; 95% CI: 3.26-3.35) (p<0.001). Among children, those aged 1-2 y (compared to those aged 3-5 y), boys (compared to girls), and non-Hispanic black (NHB) children (compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) and Mexican-American (MA) children) had higher sTfR concentrations. Among non-pregnant women, adolescents (15-19 y) had higher sTfR concentrations than adults aged 20-34 y but not compared to adults aged 35-49 y; NHB women (compared to NHW and MA women) and multiparous women (compared to nulliparous women) had higher sTfR concentrations. The derived cutoff values (97.5th percentile in a defined healthy reference population) for defining elevated sTfR in the US were 6.00 mg/l for children 1-5 y and 5.33 mg/l for non-pregnant women 15-49 y. CONCLUSIONS: A different sTfR cutoff value may be needed in children and non-pregnant women to define ID. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; David A Lacher; Rosemary L Schleicher; Clifford L Johnson; Elizabeth A Yetley Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Parminder S Suchdev; Sorrel M L Namaste; Grant J Aaron; Daniel J Raiten; Kenneth H Brown; Rafael Flores-Ayala Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Sean Lynch; Christine M Pfeiffer; Michael K Georgieff; Gary Brittenham; Susan Fairweather-Tait; Richard F Hurrell; Harry J McArdle; Daniel J Raiten Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Christina M Fischer; Ming Zhang; Maya R Sternberg; Maria E Jefferds; Ralph D Whitehead; Zuguo Mei; Naveen Paudyal; Nira Joshi; Kedar R Parajuli; Debendra P Adhikari; Donna J LaVoie; Christine M Pfeiffer Journal: J Nutr Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Zuguo Mei; O Yaw Addo; Maria Elena Jefferds; Andrea J Sharma; Rafael C Flores-Ayala; Gary M Brittenham Journal: Lancet Haematol Date: 2021-08 Impact factor: 18.959