BACKGROUND: The low cost and small specimen volume of the VitMin Lab ELISA assays for serum ferritin (Fer), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and α-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) have allowed their application to micronutrient surveys conducted in low-resource countries for ∼2 decades. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a comparison between the ELISA and reference-type assays used in the US NHANES. METHODS: Using the Roche clinical analyzer as a reference, we measured random subsets of the 2016 Nepal National Micronutrient Status Survey (200 serum samples from children aged 6-59 mo; 100 serum samples from nonpregnant women) for Fer, sTfR, CRP, and AGP. We compared the combined data sets with the ELISA survey results using descriptive analyses. RESULTS: The Lin's concordance coefficients between the 2 assays were ≥0.89 except for sTfR (Lin's ρ = 0.58). The median relative difference to the reference was as follows: Fer, -8.5%; sTfR, 71.2%; CRP, -19.5%; and AGP, -8.2%. The percentage of VitMin samples agreeing within ±30% of the reference was as follows: Fer, 88.5%; sTfR, 1.70%; CRP, 74.9%; and AGP, 92.9%. The prevalence of abnormal results was comparable between the 2 assays for Fer, CRP, and AGP, and for sTfR after adjusting to the Roche assay. Continued biannual performance (2007-2019) of the VitMin assays in CDC's external quality assessment program (6 samples/y) demonstrated generally acceptable performance. CONCLUSIONS: Using samples from the Nepal survey, the VitMin ELISA assays produced mostly comparable results to the Roche reference-type assays for Fer, CRP, and AGP. The lack of sTfR assay standardization to a common reference material explains the large systematic difference observed for sTfR, which could be corrected by an adjustment equation pending further validation. This snapshot comparison together with the long-term external quality assessment links the survey data generated by the VitMin Lab to the Roche assays used in NHANES. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2021.
BACKGROUND: The low cost and small specimen volume of the VitMin Lab ELISA assays for serum ferritin (Fer), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and α-1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) have allowed their application to micronutrient surveys conducted in low-resource countries for ∼2 decades. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a comparison between the ELISA and reference-type assays used in the US NHANES. METHODS: Using the Roche clinical analyzer as a reference, we measured random subsets of the 2016 Nepal National Micronutrient Status Survey (200 serum samples from children aged 6-59 mo; 100 serum samples from nonpregnant women) for Fer, sTfR, CRP, and AGP. We compared the combined data sets with the ELISA survey results using descriptive analyses. RESULTS: The Lin's concordance coefficients between the 2 assays were ≥0.89 except for sTfR (Lin's ρ = 0.58). The median relative difference to the reference was as follows: Fer, -8.5%; sTfR, 71.2%; CRP, -19.5%; and AGP, -8.2%. The percentage of VitMin samples agreeing within ±30% of the reference was as follows: Fer, 88.5%; sTfR, 1.70%; CRP, 74.9%; and AGP, 92.9%. The prevalence of abnormal results was comparable between the 2 assays for Fer, CRP, and AGP, and for sTfR after adjusting to the Roche assay. Continued biannual performance (2007-2019) of the VitMin assays in CDC's external quality assessment program (6 samples/y) demonstrated generally acceptable performance. CONCLUSIONS: Using samples from the Nepal survey, the VitMin ELISA assays produced mostly comparable results to the Roche reference-type assays for Fer, CRP, and AGP. The lack of sTfR assay standardization to a common reference material explains the large systematic difference observed for sTfR, which could be corrected by an adjustment equation pending further validation. This snapshot comparison together with the long-term external quality assessment links the survey data generated by the VitMin Lab to the Roche assays used in NHANES. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition 2021.
Authors: Christine M Pfeiffer; James D Cook; Zuguo Mei; Mary E Cogswell; Anne C Looker; David A Lacher Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2007-04-24 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Fabian Rohner; Christine Northrop-Clewes; Andres B Tschannen; Patrice E Bosso; Valérie Kouassi-Gohou; Juergen G Erhardt; Mai Bui; Michael B Zimmermann; C G Nicholas Mascie-Taylor Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Daniel J Raiten; Fayrouz A Sakr Ashour; A Catharine Ross; Simin N Meydani; Harry D Dawson; Charles B Stephensen; Bernard J Brabin; Parminder S Suchdev; Ben van Ommen Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Zuguo Mei; Christine M Pfeiffer; Anne C Looker; Rafael C Flores-Ayala; David A Lacher; Lisa B Mirel; Laurence M Grummer-Strawn Journal: Clin Chim Acta Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 3.786
Authors: Sean Lynch; Christine M Pfeiffer; Michael K Georgieff; Gary Brittenham; Susan Fairweather-Tait; Richard F Hurrell; Harry J McArdle; Daniel J Raiten Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Sorrel Ml Namaste; Fabian Rohner; Jin Huang; Nivedita L Bhushan; Rafael Flores-Ayala; Roland Kupka; Zuguo Mei; Rahul Rawat; Anne M Williams; Daniel J Raiten; Christine A Northrop-Clewes; Parminder S Suchdev Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 7.045