PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement of fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) cine technique with segmented k-space fast gradient echo (GRE) cine technique when using them for assessment of cardiac function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven MR cine studies were performed on six healthy volunteers and five patients, using FIESTA and fast GRE techniques. The quantitative measurements of ventricular function obtained from the two techniques were compared. The data analysis was performed by two observers independently. RESULTS: Compared to fast GRE cine technique, FIESTA cine technique consistently resulted in higher end-diastolic volume (10.2%) and end-systolic volume (21.6%), but lower myocardial mass of left ventricle (19.2%) and ejection fraction (9.9%). The stroke volume obtained from the two techniques was very close. The primary explanation for this variability is that the two techniques have different mechanisms on establishing signal contrast. CONCLUSION: Compared to fast GRE technique, FIESTA provides significantly different results when using it for assessment of left ventricular function. It is important to consider this difference in the assessment of cardiac function. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement of fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) cine technique with segmented k-space fast gradient echo (GRE) cine technique when using them for assessment of cardiac function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven MR cine studies were performed on six healthy volunteers and five patients, using FIESTA and fast GRE techniques. The quantitative measurements of ventricular function obtained from the two techniques were compared. The data analysis was performed by two observers independently. RESULTS: Compared to fast GRE cine technique, FIESTA cine technique consistently resulted in higher end-diastolic volume (10.2%) and end-systolic volume (21.6%), but lower myocardial mass of left ventricle (19.2%) and ejection fraction (9.9%). The stroke volume obtained from the two techniques was very close. The primary explanation for this variability is that the two techniques have different mechanisms on establishing signal contrast. CONCLUSION: Compared to fast GRE technique, FIESTA provides significantly different results when using it for assessment of left ventricular function. It is important to consider this difference in the assessment of cardiac function. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: H Steen; K Nasir; E Flynn; I El-Shehaby; S Lai; H A Katus; D Bluemcke; J A C Lima Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2007-09-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Nadine Kawel; Evrim B Turkbey; J Jeffrey Carr; John Eng; Antoinette S Gomes; W Gregory Hundley; Craig Johnson; Sofia C Masri; Martin R Prince; Rob J van der Geest; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Hisataka Kobayashi; Satomi Kawamoto; Martin W Brechbiel; Marcelino Bernardo; Noriko Sato; Thomas A Waldmann; Yutaka Tagaya; Peter L Choyke Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Ashkan Akhavan Malayeri; W Craig Johnson; Robson Macedo; Joan Bathon; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Stefan Buchner; Kurt Debl; Josef Haimerl; Behrus Djavidani; Florian Poschenrieder; Stefan Feuerbach; Guenter A J Riegger; Andreas Luchner Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Vladimir Shusterman; Prashant Nagpal; Daniel Thedens; Xiaodong Zhu; Daniel S Matasic; Jin-Young Yoon; Gina Morgan; Stacy Hoffman; Barry London Journal: Biomed Phys Eng Express Date: 2019-05-16