Literature DB >> 22705391

Motor cortex excitability is tightly coupled to observed movements.

Luisa Sartori1, Giulia Bucchioni, Umberto Castiello.   

Abstract

Although facilitation of the corticospinal (CS) system during action observation is a widely accepted phenomenon, it is still controversial if facilitation reflects the replica of observed movement kinematics or the tension to achieve a particular goal. In this study, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the abductor digiti minimi (ADM) and the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) muscles while participant-volunteers observed a model grasping a small target eliciting a precision grip or a large target eliciting a whole hand grasp directed toward an isolated object or flanked by different sized objects (i.e., distractor). A detailed movement analysis revealed that the model's kinematics were influenced by the distractor's size. Video clips filming the scene were edited in such a way that the distractor was removed from the scene. Participant-volunteers were asked to observe actions characterized by the same goal but performed using different kinematical patterns. Although the differences in movement kinematics were not noticed by the participant-volunteers, they nonetheless elicited distinct configurations of corticospinal activation. Detailed motor matching seems to recruit the same muscles in the onlooker as in the person actually carrying out the action during observation of grasping actions. These effects appear to be elicited by very subtle, imperceptible aspects of observed actions pointing to a finely tuned mechanism that specifically encodes body parts.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22705391     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  12 in total

1.  Direct mapping rather than motor prediction subserves modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation of actions in real time.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sofia I Mc Cabe; Jorge I Villalta; Scott T Grafton; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  What you see is what you get: motor resonance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Antonella Leonetti; Guglielmo Puglisi; Roma Siugzdaite; Clarissa Ferrari; Gabriella Cerri; Paola Borroni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The Relative Influence of Goal and Kinematics on Corticospinal Excitability Depends on the Information Provided to the Observer.

Authors:  Sofía I Mc Cabe; Jorge Ignacio Villalta; Ghislain Saunier; Scott T Grafton; Valeria Della-Maggiore
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Muscle-specific modulation of indirect inputs to primary motor cortex during action observation.

Authors:  Andreea Loredana Cretu; Kathy L Ruddy; Alain Post; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Weight dependent modulation of motor resonance induced by weight estimation during observation of partially occluded lifting actions.

Authors:  Nikola Valchev; Inge Zijdewind; Christian Keysers; Valeria Gazzola; Alessio Avenanti; Natasha M Maurits
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Motor cortical processing is causally involved in object recognition.

Authors:  Rebecca Decloe; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Motor contagion during human-human and human-robot interaction.

Authors:  Ambra Bisio; Alessandra Sciutti; Francesco Nori; Giorgio Metta; Luciano Fadiga; Giulio Sandini; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Beta event-related desynchronization as an index of individual differences in processing human facial expression: further investigations of autistic traits in typically developing adults.

Authors:  Nicholas R Cooper; Andrew Simpson; Amy Till; Kelly Simmons; Ignazio Puzzo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Grasp-specific motor resonance is influenced by the visibility of the observed actor.

Authors:  Karen L Bunday; Roger N Lemon; James M Kilner; Marco Davare; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Observing Grasping Actions Directed to Emotion-Laden Objects: Effects upon Corticospinal Excitability.

Authors:  Anaelli A Nogueira-Campos; Ghislain Saunier; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Laura A S De Oliveira; Erika C Rodrigues; Claudia D Vargas
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.