BACKGROUND: Policies on menu labeling have been proposed as a method to improve the food environment. However, there is little information on the nutrient content of chain restaurant menu items and changes over time. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the energy, saturated fat, and sodium content of entrées 6 and 18 months post-implementation of restaurant menu labeling in King County of Washington State for items that were on the menu at both time periods, and across all items at 6 and 18 months and to compare energy content to recommendations provided by the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. SETTING: Eligible restaurants included sit-down and quick-service chains (eg, burgers, pizza, sandwiches/subs, and Tex-Mex) subject to King County regulations with four or more establishments. One establishment per chain was audited at each time period. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Hypothesis one examined entrées that were on the menu at both time periods using a paired t test and hypothesis two compared quartiles at 6 months to the distribution at 18 months using a Mantel-Haentzel odds ratios and 95% CIs, and a Cochrane-Armitage test for trend. The content of entrées at 18 months was compared with one-third (assuming three meals per day) of the nutrient intake recommendations for adults provided by the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. RESULTS: The audit included 37 eligible chains of 92 regulated chains. Energy contents were lower (all chains -41, sit down -73, and quick service -19; paired t tests P<0.0001) for entrées that were on the menu at both time periods. There was a significant trend across quartiles for a decrease in energy, saturated fat, and sodium for all entrées at sit-down chains only. At 18 months entrées not designated for children exceeded 56%, 77%, and 89% of the energy, saturated fat, and sodium guidelines, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modest improvements in the nutrient content of sit-down and quick-service restaurant entrées occurred but overall levels for energy, saturated fat, and sodium are excessive.
BACKGROUND: Policies on menu labeling have been proposed as a method to improve the food environment. However, there is little information on the nutrient content of chain restaurant menu items and changes over time. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the energy, saturated fat, and sodium content of entrées 6 and 18 months post-implementation of restaurant menu labeling in King County of Washington State for items that were on the menu at both time periods, and across all items at 6 and 18 months and to compare energy content to recommendations provided by the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. SETTING: Eligible restaurants included sit-down and quick-service chains (eg, burgers, pizza, sandwiches/subs, and Tex-Mex) subject to King County regulations with four or more establishments. One establishment per chain was audited at each time period. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Hypothesis one examined entrées that were on the menu at both time periods using a paired t test and hypothesis two compared quartiles at 6 months to the distribution at 18 months using a Mantel-Haentzel odds ratios and 95% CIs, and a Cochrane-Armitage test for trend. The content of entrées at 18 months was compared with one-third (assuming three meals per day) of the nutrient intake recommendations for adults provided by the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. RESULTS: The audit included 37 eligible chains of 92 regulated chains. Energy contents were lower (all chains -41, sit down -73, and quick service -19; paired t tests P<0.0001) for entrées that were on the menu at both time periods. There was a significant trend across quartiles for a decrease in energy, saturated fat, and sodium for all entrées at sit-down chains only. At 18 months entrées not designated for children exceeded 56%, 77%, and 89% of the energy, saturated fat, and sodium guidelines, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Modest improvements in the nutrient content of sit-down and quick-service restaurant entrées occurred but overall levels for energy, saturated fat, and sodium are excessive.
Authors: Michael W Long; Deirdre K Tobias; Angie L Cradock; Holly Batchelder; Steven L Gortmaker Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nicole Larson; Ann F Haynos; Christina A Roberto; Katie A Loth; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Sara N Bleich; Christina D Economos; Marie L Spiker; Kelsey A Vercammen; Eric M VanEpps; Jason P Block; Brian Elbel; Mary Story; Christina A Roberto Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Zerleen S Quader; Sheena Patel; Cathleen Gillespie; Mary E Cogswell; Janelle P Gunn; Cria G Perrine; Richard D Mattes; Alanna Moshfegh Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Joyce Maalouf; Mary E Cogswell; Janelle P Gunn; Christine J Curtis; Donna Rhodes; Kathy Hoy; Pamela Pehrsson; Melissa Nickle; Robert Merritt Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 9.308