Literature DB >> 22703879

Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes.

Jennifer J Johnston1, Wendy S Rubinstein, Flavia M Facio, David Ng, Larry N Singh, Jamie K Teer, James C Mullikin, Leslie G Biesecker.   

Abstract

Genome- and exome-sequencing costs are continuing to fall, and many individuals are undergoing these assessments as research participants and patients. The issue of secondary (so-called incidental) findings in exome analysis is controversial, and data are needed on methods of detection and their frequency. We piloted secondary variant detection by analyzing exomes for mutations in cancer-susceptibility syndromes in subjects ascertained for atherosclerosis phenotypes. We performed exome sequencing on 572 ClinSeq participants, and in 37 genes, we interpreted variants that cause high-penetrance cancer syndromes by using an algorithm that filtered results on the basis of mutation type, quality, and frequency and that filtered mutation-database entries on the basis of defined categories of causation. We identified 454 sequence variants that differed from the human reference. Exclusions were made on the basis of sequence quality (26 variants) and high frequency in the cohort (77 variants) or dbSNP (17 variants), leaving 334 variants of potential clinical importance. These were further filtered on the basis of curation of literature reports. Seven participants, four of whom were of Ashkenazi Jewish descent and three of whom did not meet family-history-based referral criteria, had deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. One participant had a deleterious SDHC mutation, which causes paragangliomas. Exome sequencing, coupled with multidisciplinary interpretation, detected clinically important mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes; four of such mutations were in individuals without a significant family history of disease. We conclude that secondary variants of high clinical importance will be detected at an appreciable frequency in exomes, and we suggest that priority be given to the development of more efficient modes of interpretation with trials in larger patient groups.
Copyright © 2012 The American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22703879      PMCID: PMC3397257          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  42 in total

Review 1.  Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.

Authors:  Annelien L Bredenoord; Hester Y Kroes; Edwin Cuppen; Michael Parker; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Locus-specific databases and recommendations to strengthen their contribution to the classification of variants in cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Marc S Greenblatt; Lawrence C Brody; William D Foulkes; Maurizio Genuardi; Robert M W Hofstra; Magali Olivier; Sharon E Plon; Rolf H Sijmons; Olga Sinilnikova; Amanda B Spurdle
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

3.  The ClinSeq Project: piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine.

Authors:  Leslie G Biesecker; James C Mullikin; Flavia M Facio; Clesson Turner; Praveen F Cherukuri; Robert W Blakesley; Gerard G Bouffard; Peter S Chines; Pedro Cruz; Nancy F Hansen; Jamie K Teer; Baishali Maskeri; Alice C Young; Teri A Manolio; Alexander F Wilson; Toren Finkel; Paul Hwang; Andrew Arai; Alan T Remaley; Vandana Sachdev; Robert Shamburek; Richard O Cannon; Eric D Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Clinical predictors for germline mutations in head and neck paraganglioma patients: cost reduction strategy in genetic diagnostic process as fall-out.

Authors:  Hartmut P H Neumann; Zoran Erlic; Carsten C Boedeker; Lisa A Rybicki; Mercedes Robledo; Mario Hermsen; Francesca Schiavi; Maurizio Falcioni; Pingling Kwok; Catherine Bauters; Karen Lampe; Markus Fischer; Emily Edelman; Diana E Benn; Bruce G Robinson; Stefanie Wiegand; Gerd Rasp; Boris A Stuck; Michael M Hoffmann; Maren Sullivan; Maria A Sevilla; Marjan M Weiss; Mariola Peczkowska; Agata Kubaszek; Pascal Pigny; Robyn L Ward; Diana Learoyd; Michael Croxson; Dmitry Zabolotny; Svetlana Yaremchuk; Wolfgang Draf; Mihaela Muresan; Robert R Lorenz; Stephan Knipping; Michael Strohm; Gerhard Dyckhoff; Christoph Matthias; Nicole Reisch; Simon F Preuss; Dirk Esser; Martin A Walter; Holger Kaftan; Timo Stöver; Christian Fottner; Harald Gorgulla; Mahdi Malekpour; Masoud Motasaddi Zarandy; Jörg Schipper; Christoph Brase; Alexander Glien; Matthias Kühnemund; Sven Koscielny; Peter Schwerdtfeger; Matti Välimäki; Witold Szyfter; Ulrich Finckh; Klaus Zerres; Alberto Cascon; Giuseppe Opocher; Gerd J Ridder; Andrzej Januszewicz; Carlos Suarez; Charis Eng
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  The succinate dehydrogenase genetic testing in a large prospective series of patients with paragangliomas.

Authors:  Nelly Burnichon; Vincent Rohmer; Laurence Amar; Philippe Herman; Sophie Leboulleux; Vincent Darrouzet; Patricia Niccoli; Dominique Gaillard; Gérard Chabrier; Frédéric Chabolle; Isabelle Coupier; Philippe Thieblot; Pierre Lecomte; Jérôme Bertherat; Nelly Wion-Barbot; Arnaud Murat; Annabelle Venisse; Pierre-François Plouin; Xavier Jeunemaitre; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  E-cadherin mutations and cell motility: a genotype-phenotype correlation.

Authors:  Ana Rita Mateus; Joana Simões-Correia; Joana Figueiredo; Stefan Heindl; Catarina Castro Alves; Gianpaolo Suriano; Birgit Luber; Raquel Seruca
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 7.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder.

Authors:  Sarah B Ng; Kati J Buckingham; Choli Lee; Abigail W Bigham; Holly K Tabor; Karin M Dent; Chad D Huff; Paul T Shannon; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Deborah A Nickerson; Jay Shendure; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA1/2 testing and ovarian cancer prevention for Ashkenazi Jews: a call for dialogue.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein; Hongmei Jiang; Lisa Dellefave; Alfred W Rademaker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results.

Authors:  Sharon E Plon; Diana M Eccles; Douglas Easton; William D Foulkes; Maurizio Genuardi; Marc S Greenblatt; Frans B L Hogervorst; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Amanda B Spurdle; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  123 in total

1.  Disclosure of secondary findings in exome sequencing of 2480 Japanese cancer patients.

Authors:  Yasue Horiuchi; Hiroyuki Matsubayashi; Yoshimi Kiyozumi; Seiichiro Nishimura; Satomi Higashigawa; Nobuhiro Kado; Takeshi Nagashima; Maki Mizuguchi; Sumiko Ohnami; Makoto Arai; Kenichi Urakami; Masatoshi Kusuhara; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Variability in assigning pathogenicity to incidental findings: insights from LDLR sequence linked to the electronic health record in 1013 individuals.

Authors:  Maya S Safarova; Eric W Klee; Linnea M Baudhuin; Erin M Winkler; Michelle L Kluge; Suzette J Bielinski; Janet E Olson; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 4.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Secondary variants--in defense of a more fitting term in the incidental findings debate.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Clinical genomic database.

Authors:  Benjamin D Solomon; Anh-Dao Nguyen; Kelly A Bear; Tyra G Wolfsberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A genetic counselor's guide to using next-generation sequencing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Flavia M Facio; Kristy Lee; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Rates of Actionable Genetic Findings in Individuals with Colorectal Cancer or Polyps Ascertained from a Community Medical Setting.

Authors:  Adam S Gordon; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; David S Carrell; Laura M Amendola; Michael O Dorschner; Aaron Scrol; Ian B Stanaway; Shannon DeVange; James D Ralston; Hana Zouk; Heidi L Rehm; Eric Larson; David R Crosslin; Kathy A Leppig; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ferrer; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Peter R Harris; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-12-08

10.  Whole-exome sequencing identifies mutations of TBC1D1 encoding a Rab-GTPase-activating protein in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT).

Authors:  Anne Kosfeld; Martin Kreuzer; Christoph Daniel; Frank Brand; Anne-Kathrin Schäfer; Alexandra Chadt; Anna-Carina Weiss; Vera Riehmer; Cécile Jeanpierre; Michael Klintschar; Jan Hinrich Bräsen; Kerstin Amann; Lars Pape; Andreas Kispert; Hadi Al-Hasani; Dieter Haffner; Ruthild G Weber
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.