Literature DB >> 32710294

Disclosure of secondary findings in exome sequencing of 2480 Japanese cancer patients.

Yasue Horiuchi1,2, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi3, Yoshimi Kiyozumi1, Seiichiro Nishimura1, Satomi Higashigawa1, Nobuhiro Kado1, Takeshi Nagashima4, Maki Mizuguchi4, Sumiko Ohnami4, Makoto Arai2, Kenichi Urakami4, Masatoshi Kusuhara4, Ken Yamaguchi4.   

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing has greatly contributed to precision medicine. However, challenges remain in reporting secondary findings (SFs) of germline pathogenic variants and managing the affected patients. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of SFs in Japanese cancer patients using whole exome sequencing (WES) and to understand patient preferences regarding SF disclosure. WES was conducted for 2480 cancer patients. Genomic data were screened and classified for variants of 59 genes listed by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics SF v2.0 and for an additional 13 hereditary cancer-related genes. Majority of the participants (68.9%; 1709/2480) opted for disclosure of their SFs. Thirty-two pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, including BRCA1 (7 patients), BRCA2 (4), CHEK2 (4), PTEN (3), MLH1 (3), SDHB (2), MSH6 (1), NF1 (1), EXT2 (1), NF1 (1), NTRK1 (1), MYH7 (3), MYL2 (1), TNNT2 (1), LDLR (2), FBN1 (1), and KCNH2 (1) were recognized in 36 patients (1.5%). Twenty-eight (77.8%) patients underwent genetic counseling and received their SF results. Eighteen (64.3%) patients underwent clinical management for SFs. Genetic validation tests were administered significantly more frequently to patients with than without a SF-related personal history (P = 0.025). This was a first attempt at a large-scale systematic exome analysis in Japan; nevertheless, many cancer patients opted for disclosure of SFs and accepted or considered clinical management.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32710294     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-020-02207-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  33 in total

1.  Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Gloria M Petersen; Susan M Wolf; Kari G Chaffee; Marguerite E Robinson; Deborah R Gordon; Noralane M Lindor; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Interest and Attitudes of Patients With Advanced Cancer With Regard to Secondary Germline Findings From Tumor Genomic Profiling.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Elyse Shuk; Margaux C Genoff; Vivian M Rodríguez; Jennifer L Hay; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system.

Authors:  Noura S Abul-Husn; Kandamurugu Manickam; Laney K Jones; Eric A Wright; Dustin N Hartzel; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Colm O'Dushlaine; Joseph B Leader; H Lester Kirchner; D'Andra M Lindbuchler; Marci L Barr; Monica A Giovanni; Marylyn D Ritchie; John D Overton; Jeffrey G Reid; Raghu P R Metpally; Amr H Wardeh; Ingrid B Borecki; George D Yancopoulos; Aris Baras; Alan R Shuldiner; Omri Gottesman; David H Ledbetter; David J Carey; Frederick E Dewey; Michael F Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Jennifer J Johnston; Wendy S Rubinstein; Flavia M Facio; David Ng; Larry N Singh; Jamie K Teer; James C Mullikin; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Recent understanding of clinical sequencing and gene-based risk stratification in inherited primary arrhythmia syndrome.

Authors:  Takeshi Aiba
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Robin Bennett; Jeffrey Botkin; Ellen Wright Clayton; Gail E Henderson; Ingrid A Holm; Gail P Jarvik; Muin J Khoury; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Mark A Rothstein; Howard Saal; Wendy R Uhlmann; Benjamin Wilfond; Susan M Wolf; Ron Zimmern
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Assessment of incidental findings in 232 whole-exome sequences from the Baylor-Hopkins Center for Mendelian Genomics.

Authors:  Julie Jurgens; Hua Ling; Kurt Hetrick; Elizabeth Pugh; Francois Schiettecatte; Kimberly Doheny; Ada Hamosh; Dimitri Avramopoulos; David Valle; Nara Sobreira
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.

Authors:  Kristin E Clift; Colin M E Halverson; Alexander S Fiksdal; Ashok Kumbamu; Richard R Sharp; Jennifer B McCormick
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2015-02-21

10.  Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study.

Authors:  David L Veenstra; Jonathan S Berg; Robert C Green; Leslie G Biesecker; Lucia A Hindorff; M Ragan Hart; Barbara B Biesecker; Carrie L Blout; Kurt D Christensen; Laura M Amendola; Katie L Bergstrom; Sawona Biswas; Kevin M Bowling; Kyle B Brothers; Laura K Conlin; Greg M Cooper; Matthew C Dulik; Kelly M East; Jessica N Everett; Candice R Finnila; Arezou A Ghazani; Marian J Gilmore; Katrina A B Goddard; Gail P Jarvik; Jennifer J Johnston; Tia L Kauffman; Whitley V Kelley; Joel B Krier; Katie L Lewis; Amy L McGuire; Carmit McMullen; Jeffrey Ou; Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm; C Sue Richards; Edward J Romasko; Ane Miren Sagardia; Nancy B Spinner; Michelle L Thompson; Erin Turbitt; Jason L Vassy; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Returning individual genomic results to population-based cohort study participants with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Kinuko Ohneda; Yohei Hamanaka; Hiroshi Kawame; Nobuo Fuse; Fuji Nagami; Yoichi Suzuki; Yumi Yamaguchi-Kabata; Muneaki Shimada; Atsushi Masamune; Yoko Aoki; Takanori Ishida; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Shannon Rego; Hannah Hoban; Simon Outram; Astrid N Zamora; Flavia Chen; Nuriye Sahin-Hodoglugil; Beatriz Anguiano; Matthew Norstad; Tiffany Yip; Billie Lianoglou; Teresa N Sparks; Mary E Norton; Barbara A Koenig; Anne M Slavotinek; Sara L Ackerman
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 8.864

3.  A systematic literature review of disclosure practices and reported outcomes for medically actionable genomic secondary findings.

Authors:  Julie C Sapp; Flavia M Facio; Diane Cooper; Katie L Lewis; Emily Modlin; Philip van der Wees; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 8.864

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.