| Literature DB >> 22701755 |
Ivana Cacciatore1, Leonardo Baldassarre, Erika Fornasari, Adriano Mollica, Francesco Pinnen.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease(AD), are a group of pathologies characterized by a progressive and specific loss of certain brain cell populations. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis play interrelated roles in these disorders. It is well documented that free radical oxidative damage, particularly on neuronal lipids, proteins, DNA, and RNA, is extensive in PD and AD brains. Moreover, alterations of glutathione (GSH) metabolism in brain have been implicated in oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases. As a consequence, the reduced GSH levels observed in these pathologies have stimulated a number of researchers to find new potential approaches for maintaining or restoring GSH levels. Unfortunately, GSH delivery to the central nervous system (CNS) is limited due to a poor stability and low bioavailability. Medicinal-chemistry- and technology-based approaches are commonly used to improve physicochemical, biopharmaceutical, and drug delivery properties of therapeutic agents. This paper will focus primarily on these approaches used in order to replenish intracellular GSH levels, which are reduced in neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we discuss the beneficial properties of these approaches and their potential implications for the future treatment of patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases, and more specifically from PD and AD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22701755 PMCID: PMC3372378 DOI: 10.1155/2012/240146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Chemical structures of GSH codrugs 1-2.
Figure 2Chemical structures of GSH codrugs 3-4.
Figure 3Chemical structure of GSH hybrid 5.
Figure 4Chemical structures of GSH codrugs 6-7.
Figure 5Chemical structure of GSH codrug 8.
Kinetic data for chemical hydrolysis of codrugs 1-2, 5, and 9–14 at 37°C.
| pH 1.3a | pH 7.4a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compd | ||||
| 20.14 (±0.73) | 0.034 (±1.2 × 10−3) | 7.22 (±0.31) | 0.096 (±4.1 × 10−3) | |
| 28.12 (±1.21) | 0.025 (±1.1 × 10−3) | 12.23 (±0.49) | 0.057 (±2.3 × 10−3) | |
| 20.67 (±0.83) | 0.094 (±0.3 × 10−3) | 10.80 (±0.40) | 0.018 (±0.8 × 10−3) | |
| 301.0 (±10.5) | 0.002 (±0.07 × 10−3) | 46.2 (±0.90) | 0.015 (±0.3 × 10−3) | |
| 290.6 (±5.8) | 0.002 (±0.04 × 10−3) | 48.0 (±1.70) | 0.015 (±0.45 × 10−3) | |
| 296.3 (±11.8) | 0.002 (±0.08 × 10−3) | 30.2 (±1.40) | 0.023 (±1.04 × 10−3) | |
| 292.1 (±4.4) | 0.002 (±0.03 × 10−3) | 26.9 (±0.70) | 0.026 (±0.65 × 10−3) | |
| 292.8 (±8.8) | 0.002 (±0.06 × 10−3) | 48.50 (±0.70) | 0.005 (±0.25 × 10−3) | |
| 293.4 (±14.7) | 0.002 (±0.1 × 10−3) | 21.3 (±0.60) | 0.033 (±0.99 × 10−3) | |
aValues are means of three experiments, and standard deviation is given in parentheses.
Rate constants for the hydrolysis of codrugs 1-2, 5, and 9–14 in 80% rat plasma and 80% human plasma at 37°C.
| Rat plasmaa | Human plasmaa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compd | ||||
| immediate hydrolysis | — | 3.2 (±0.1) | 0.217 (±6 × 10−3) | |
| 2.7 (±0.1) | 0.257 (±8 × 10−3) | 15.1 (±0.4) | 0.046 (±1 × 10−3) | |
| 4.7 (±0.1) | 0.150 (±0.01) | 7.3 (±0.3) | 0.100 (±0.01) | |
| 46.8 (±1.4) | 0.010 (±0.20 × 10−3) | 69.6 (±1.4) | 0.015 (±0.44 × 10−3) | |
| 36.6 (±1.6) | 0.019 (±0.85 × 10−3) | 65.4 (±1.6) | 0.011 (±0.26 × 10−3) | |
| 115.2 (±11.0) | 0.002 (±0.07 × 10−3) | 315.0 (±4.6) | 0.006 (±0.24 × 10−3) | |
| 93.0 (±10.2) | 0.003 (±0.17 × 10−3) | 263.4 (±1.9) | 0.007 (±0.14 × 10−3) | |
| 55.8 (±10.5) | 0.003 (±0.11 × 10−3) | 203.4 (±0.6) | 0.030 (±0.75 | |
| 69.6 (±3.5) | 0.010 (±0.50 × 10−3) | 90.0 (±2.7) | 0.008 (±0.24 × 10−3) | |
aValues are means of three experiments, standard deviation is given in parentheses.
Figure 6Chemical structures of cysteinyl codrugs 9–14.
Figure 7Chemical structures of thiol conjugates 15–20.
Figure 8Liposomal GSH delivery to neurons and relative hydrolysis following fusion with lysosome.
Figure 9Chemical structures of GS-PEG-SG (21) and GS-SPEGS-SG (22).
Figure 10Scheme for GS-GSH NPs preparation as reported by Koo et al. [98].