BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: WMH, associated with cognitive decline and cardiovascular risk factors, may represent only the extreme end of a more widespread continuous WM injury process that progresses during aging and is poorly understood. We investigated the ability of FLAIR and DTI to characterize the longitudinal course of WMH development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred nineteen participants (mean age, 74.5 ± 7.4), including cognitively healthy elders and subjects diagnosed with Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment, received a comprehensive clinical evaluation and brain MR imaging, including FLAIR and DTI on 2 dates. The risk for each baseline normal-appearing WM voxel to convert into WMH was modeled as a function of baseline FA (model M1) and both baseline FA and standardized FLAIR (M2). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC for predicting conversion to WMH were compared between models. RESULTS: Independent of clinical diagnosis, lower baseline FA (P < .001, both models) and higher baseline FLAIR intensity (P < .001, M2) were independently associated with increased risk for conversion from normal WM to WMH. M1 exhibited higher sensitivity but lower specificity, accuracy, and AUC compared with M2. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence that WMH result from a continuous process of WM degeneration with time. Stepwise decreases in WM integrity as measured by both DTI and FLAIR were independently associated with stepwise increases in WMH risk, emphasizing that these modalities may provide complementary information for understanding the time course of aging-associated WM degeneration.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:WMH, associated with cognitive decline and cardiovascular risk factors, may represent only the extreme end of a more widespread continuous WM injury process that progresses during aging and is poorly understood. We investigated the ability of FLAIR and DTI to characterize the longitudinal course of WMH development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred nineteen participants (mean age, 74.5 ± 7.4), including cognitively healthy elders and subjects diagnosed with Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment, received a comprehensive clinical evaluation and brain MR imaging, including FLAIR and DTI on 2 dates. The risk for each baseline normal-appearing WM voxel to convert into WMH was modeled as a function of baseline FA (model M1) and both baseline FA and standardized FLAIR (M2). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC for predicting conversion to WMH were compared between models. RESULTS: Independent of clinical diagnosis, lower baseline FA (P < .001, both models) and higher baseline FLAIR intensity (P < .001, M2) were independently associated with increased risk for conversion from normal WM to WMH. M1 exhibited higher sensitivity but lower specificity, accuracy, and AUC compared with M2. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide further evidence that WMH result from a continuous process of WM degeneration with time. Stepwise decreases in WM integrity as measured by both DTI and FLAIR were independently associated with stepwise increases in WMH risk, emphasizing that these modalities may provide complementary information for understanding the time course of aging-associated WM degeneration.
Authors: R A Charlton; T R Barrick; D J McIntyre; Y Shen; M O'Sullivan; F A Howe; C A Clark; R G Morris; H S Markus Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-01-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christine Wu Nordahl; Charan Ranganath; Andrew P Yonelinas; Charles DeCarli; Bruce R Reed; William J Jagust Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2005-02-05 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: M Yoshita; E Fletcher; D Harvey; M Ortega; O Martinez; D M Mungas; B R Reed; C S DeCarli Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-12-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rhoda Au; Joseph M Massaro; Philip A Wolf; Megan E Young; Alexa Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; Ralph B D'Agostino; Charles DeCarli Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2006-02
Authors: Alida A Gouw; Wiesje M van der Flier; Franz Fazekas; Elisabeth C W van Straaten; Leonardo Pantoni; Anna Poggesi; Domenico Inzitari; Timo Erkinjuntti; Lars O Wahlund; Gunhild Waldemar; Reinhold Schmidt; Philip Scheltens; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Stroke Date: 2008-03-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Robert K McNamara; Ruth H Asch; Diana M Lindquist; Robert Krikorian Journal: Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 4.006
Authors: William Reginold; Kevin Sam; Julien Poublanc; Joe Fisher; Adrian Crawley; David J Mikulis Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: J M Prager; C Thomas; W J Ankenbrandt; J R Meyer; Y Gao; A Ragin; S Sidharthan; R Hutten; Y G Wu Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.825