OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume on magnetic resonance images and cognitive tests in a large, population-based sample. METHODS: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological evaluations were performed in 1820 dementia- and stroke-free participants from the Framingham Offspring Cohort. The WMH volume relative to total cranial volume was computed; WMH volumes more than 1 SD above the age-predicted mean were defined as large. Adjusting for age, sex, education, height, and Framingham Stroke Risk Profile, we examined the relationship between WMH and 3 cognitive factors derived from a neuropsychological test battery (verbal memory, visuospatial memory and organization, and visual scanning and motor speed) and 3 individual measures of new learning, abstract reasoning, and naming. RESULTS: Compared with those with no or little WMH volume, participants with large WMH volume performed worse on the cognitive factors of visuospatial memory and organization (P = .04) and visual scanning and motor speed (P = .01), as well as on new learning (P = .04), but not on verbal memory (P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: In this younger community-based population of nondemented individuals, those with large WMH volume, as compared with those with less or no WMH volumes, performed significantly worse in cognitive domains generally associated with frontal lobe systems and, to a lesser extent, the medial temporal area. Further study will clarify whether large WMH volume and associated cognitive impairment lead to future risk of stroke or dementia.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume on magnetic resonance images and cognitive tests in a large, population-based sample. METHODS: Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological evaluations were performed in 1820 dementia- and stroke-free participants from the Framingham Offspring Cohort. The WMH volume relative to total cranial volume was computed; WMH volumes more than 1 SD above the age-predicted mean were defined as large. Adjusting for age, sex, education, height, and Framingham Stroke Risk Profile, we examined the relationship between WMH and 3 cognitive factors derived from a neuropsychological test battery (verbal memory, visuospatial memory and organization, and visual scanning and motor speed) and 3 individual measures of new learning, abstract reasoning, and naming. RESULTS: Compared with those with no or little WMH volume, participants with large WMH volume performed worse on the cognitive factors of visuospatial memory and organization (P = .04) and visual scanning and motor speed (P = .01), as well as on new learning (P = .04), but not on verbal memory (P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: In this younger community-based population of nondemented individuals, those with large WMH volume, as compared with those with less or no WMH volumes, performed significantly worse in cognitive domains generally associated with frontal lobe systems and, to a lesser extent, the medial temporal area. Further study will clarify whether large WMH volume and associated cognitive impairment lead to future risk of stroke or dementia.
Authors: Coreyann Poly; Joseph M Massaro; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Eunyoung Cho; Elizabeth Krall; Paul F Jacques; Rhoda Au Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: E E Smith; D H Salat; J Jeng; C R McCreary; B Fischl; J D Schmahmann; B C Dickerson; A Viswanathan; M S Albert; D Blacker; S M Greenberg Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Barbara B Bendlin; Michele E Fitzgerald; Michele L Ries; Guofan Xu; Erik K Kastman; Brent W Thiel; Howard A Rowley; Mariana Lazar; Andrew L Alexander; Sterling C Johnson Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Karina Stavitsky; Yangchun Du; Daniel Seichepine; Thomas M Laudate; Alexa Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; Charles Decarli; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Mark Albert; Joseph Massaro; Charles DeCarli; Alexa Beiser; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2010 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Laura E M Wisse; Nirali Butala; Sandhitsu R Das; Christos Davatzikos; Bradford C Dickerson; Sanjeev N Vaishnavi; Paul A Yushkevich; David A Wolk Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Bonnie M Scott; Jacqueline Maye; Jacob Jones; Kelsey Thomas; Paul C Mangal; Erin Trifilio; Chris Hass; Michael Marsiske; Dawn Bowers Journal: Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn Date: 2015-12-02
Authors: Joanne M Murabito; Alexa S Beiser; Charles Decarli; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Rhoda Au Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 10.668