Literature DB >> 22700207

Mating compatibility and competitiveness of transgenic and wild type Aedes aegypti (L.) under contained semi-field conditions.

H L Lee1, Seshadri Vasan, Nazni Wasi Ahmad, Iswarti Idris, Norhaida Hanum, S Selvi, Luke Alphey, Shahnaz Murad.   

Abstract

We conducted the world's first experiments under semi-field conditions (ACL-2 field house) to assess the mating competitiveness of genetically sterile RIDL male mosquitoes (513A strain). The field house is a state-of-the-art, fully-contained trial facility, simulating the living space for a household of 2-4 people in Peninsular Malaysia. Ten genetically sterile RIDL male A. aegypti mosquitoes competed with ten wild type males inside this field house to mate with ten wild type females. Hatched larvae from mated females were screened under a fluorescent microscope for genetic markers to determine if they were fathered by RIDL male or wild type male, and all results were cross-checked by PCR. Two such experiments were conducted, each repeated sufficient number of times. All strains were on a Malaysian lab strain background for the first experiment, while the RIDL males alone were on a recently-colonised Mexican strain background for the second experiment. A total of 52 % of the matings were with RIDL males in the first experiment, while 45 % of the matings were with RIDL (Mexican) males in the second experiment. Statistically, this is not significantly different from 50 % of the matings expected to take place with RIDL males if the latter were as competitive as that of the wild type males. This shows that A. aegypti RIDL-513A has excellent mating competitiveness under semi-field conditions, verifying earlier trends obtained in small lab cages. We also observed high mating compatibility between recently-colonised Mexican RIDL males and lab-reared Malaysian wild type females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22700207     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-012-9625-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  8 in total

1.  Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system.

Authors:  D D Thomas; C A Donnelly; R J Wood; L S Alphey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Assessing fitness costs for transgenic Aedes aegypti expressing the GFP marker and transposase genes.

Authors:  Nic Irvin; Mark S Hoddle; David A O'Brochta; Bryan Carey; Peter W Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The first releases of transgenic mosquitoes: an argument for the sterile insect technique.

Authors:  Mark Q Benedict; Alan S Robinson
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2003-08

Review 4.  Bionomics of important mosquito vectors in Malaysia.

Authors:  I Vythilingam; G L Chiang; H L Lee; K I Singh
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 0.267

Review 5.  Mosquito transgenesis: what is the fitness cost?

Authors:  Mauro T Marrelli; Cristina K Moreira; David Kelly; Luke Alphey; Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2006-03-24

6.  Characteristics of the spatial pattern of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, in Iquitos, Peru.

Authors:  Arthur Getis; Amy C Morrison; Kenneth Gray; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  Late-acting dominant lethal genetic systems and mosquito control.

Authors:  Hoang Kim Phuc; Morten H Andreasen; Rosemary S Burton; Céline Vass; Matthew J Epton; Gavin Pape; Guoliang Fu; Kirsty C Condon; Sarah Scaife; Christl A Donnelly; Paul G Coleman; Helen White-Cooper; Luke Alphey
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 7.431

8.  Impact of genetic manipulation on the fitness of Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes.

Authors:  Flaminia Catteruccia; H Charles J Godfray; Andrea Crisanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Mating Competitiveness of Transgenic Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Males Against Wild-Type Males Reared Under Simulated Field Conditions.

Authors:  David S Kang; Joanne M Cunningham; Diane D Lovin; Dave D Chadee; David W Severson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Open field release of genetically engineered sterile male Aedes aegypti in Malaysia.

Authors:  Renaud Lacroix; Andrew R McKemey; Norzahira Raduan; Lim Kwee Wee; Wong Hong Ming; Teoh Guat Ney; Siti Rahidah A A; Sawaluddin Salman; Selvi Subramaniam; Oreenaiza Nordin; Norhaida Hanum A T; Chandru Angamuthu; Suria Marlina Mansor; Rosemary S Lees; Neil Naish; Sarah Scaife; Pam Gray; Geneviève Labbé; Camilla Beech; Derric Nimmo; Luke Alphey; Seshadri S Vasan; Lee Han Lim; Nazni Wasi A; Shahnaz Murad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Modelling sterile insect technique to control the population of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  James E Gentile; Samuel S C Rund; Gregory R Madey
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 4.  Evolutionary decay and the prospects for long-term disease intervention using engineered insect vectors.

Authors:  J J Bull
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2015-07-08

5.  Suppression of a Field Population of Aedes aegypti in Brazil by Sustained Release of Transgenic Male Mosquitoes.

Authors:  Danilo O Carvalho; Andrew R McKemey; Luiza Garziera; Renaud Lacroix; Christl A Donnelly; Luke Alphey; Aldo Malavasi; Margareth L Capurro
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2015-07-02

6.  Genetic and environmental factors associated with laboratory rearing affect survival and assortative mating but not overall mating success in Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto.

Authors:  Doug Paton; Mahamoudou Touré; Adama Sacko; Mamadou B Coulibaly; Sékou F Traoré; Frédéric Tripet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Oral ingestion of transgenic RIDL Ae. aegypti larvae has no negative effect on two predator Toxorhynchites species.

Authors:  Oreenaiza Nordin; Wesley Donald; Wong Hong Ming; Teoh Guat Ney; Khairul Asuad Mohamed; Nor Azlina Abdul Halim; Peter Winskill; Azahari Abdul Hadi; Zulkamal Safi'in Muhammad; Renaud Lacroix; Sarah Scaife; Andrew Robert McKemey; Camilla Beech; Murad Shahnaz; Luke Alphey; Derric David Nimmo; Wasi Ahmed Nazni; Han Lim Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Contrasted Fitness Costs of Docking and Antibacterial Constructs in the EE and EVida3 Strains Validates Two-Phase Anopheles gambiae Genetic Transformation System.

Authors:  Doug Paton; Anne Underhill; Janet Meredith; Paul Eggleston; Frederic Tripet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Release of genetically engineered insects: a framework to identify potential ecological effects.

Authors:  Aaron S David; Joe M Kaser; Amy C Morey; Alexander M Roth; David A Andow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 10.  Heritable strategies for controlling insect vectors of disease.

Authors:  Austin Burt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.