Literature DB >> 16564223

Mosquito transgenesis: what is the fitness cost?

Mauro T Marrelli1, Cristina K Moreira, David Kelly, Luke Alphey, Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena.   

Abstract

The generation of transgenic mosquitoes with a minimal fitness load is a prerequisite for the success of strategies for controlling mosquito-borne diseases using transgenic insects. It is important to assemble as much information as possible on this subject because realistic estimates of transgene fitness costs are essential for modeling and planning release strategies. Transgenic mosquitoes must have minimal fitness costs, because such costs would reduce the effectiveness of the genetic drive mechanisms that are used to introduce the transgenes into field mosquito populations. Several factors affect fitness of transgenic mosquitoes, including the potential negative effect of transgene products and insertional mutagenesis. Studies to assess fitness of transgenic mosquitoes in the field (as opposed to the laboratory) are still needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16564223     DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Parasitol        ISSN: 1471-4922


  65 in total

Review 1.  Safe and fit genetically modified insects for pest control: from lab to field applications.

Authors:  F Scolari; P Siciliano; P Gabrieli; L M Gomulski; A Bonomi; G Gasperi; A R Malacrida
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Analyzing the control of mosquito-borne diseases by a dominant lethal genetic system.

Authors:  Michael P Atkinson; Zheng Su; Nina Alphey; Luke S Alphey; Paul G Coleman; Lawrence M Wein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Fitness of transgenic Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes expressing the SM1 peptide under the control of a vitellogenin promoter.

Authors:  Chaoyang Li; Mauro T Marrelli; Guiyun Yan; Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.645

Review 4.  Gene expression studies in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Xiao-Guang Chen; Geetika Mathur; Anthony A James
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 5.  Genetic control of Aedes mosquitoes.

Authors:  Luke Alphey; Andrew McKemey; Derric Nimmo; Marco Neira Oviedo; Renaud Lacroix; Kelly Matzen; Camilla Beech
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Sterile-insect methods for control of mosquito-borne diseases: an analysis.

Authors:  Luke Alphey; Mark Benedict; Romeo Bellini; Gary G Clark; David A Dame; Mike W Service; Stephen L Dobson
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  Stability and loss of a virus resistance phenotype over time in transgenic mosquitoes harbouring an antiviral effector gene.

Authors:  A W E Franz; I Sanchez-Vargas; J Piper; M R Smith; C C H Khoo; A A James; K E Olson
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.585

8.  Site-specific recombination for the modification of transgenic strains of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata.

Authors:  Marc F Schetelig; Francesca Scolari; Alfred M Handler; Sebastian Kittelmann; Giuliano Gasperi; Ernst A Wimmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Genetic elimination of dengue vector mosquitoes.

Authors:  Megan R Wise de Valdez; Derric Nimmo; John Betz; Hong-Fei Gong; Anthony A James; Luke Alphey; William C Black
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Molecular genetic manipulation of vector mosquitoes.

Authors:  Olle Terenius; Osvaldo Marinotti; Douglas Sieglaff; Anthony A James
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 21.023

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.